Cargando…

According to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial

BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical outcome at 101 patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at the time of intubation, and the intraoperative intracranial pressure (ICP) were recorded. Formal DC was perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fotakopoulos, George, Tsianaka, Eleni, Vagkopoulos, Konstantinos, Fountas, Kostas N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981320
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.176671
_version_ 1782418871712481280
author Fotakopoulos, George
Tsianaka, Eleni
Vagkopoulos, Konstantinos
Fountas, Kostas N.
author_facet Fotakopoulos, George
Tsianaka, Eleni
Vagkopoulos, Konstantinos
Fountas, Kostas N.
author_sort Fotakopoulos, George
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical outcome at 101 patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at the time of intubation, and the intraoperative intracranial pressure (ICP) were recorded. Formal DC was performed in all cases and the square surface of bone flap was calculated in cm(2) based on the length and the width from computed tomography scan. RESULTS: The difference of good neurological recovery (Glasgow outcome score 4–5), between patients with ICP ≤20 mmHg, GCS ≥5, age ≤60 years, and bone flap ≥130 cm(2) and those with ICP >20 mmHg, GCS <5, age >60 years, and bone flap <130 cm(2), was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although the application of DC in severe TBI is controversial and the population in this study is small, our study demonstrates the threshold of the specific factors (patient age, ICP and GCS on the day of the surgery and the size of the bone flap) which may help in the decision of performing DC. Furthermore, this study proves that the different combinations and mainly at the same time involvement of all prognostic parameters (age <60, GCS <5, bone flap ≥130 cm(2), and ICP ≤20 at time of DC surgery) allow a better outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4774169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47741692016-03-15 According to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial Fotakopoulos, George Tsianaka, Eleni Vagkopoulos, Konstantinos Fountas, Kostas N. Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical outcome at 101 patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at the time of intubation, and the intraoperative intracranial pressure (ICP) were recorded. Formal DC was performed in all cases and the square surface of bone flap was calculated in cm(2) based on the length and the width from computed tomography scan. RESULTS: The difference of good neurological recovery (Glasgow outcome score 4–5), between patients with ICP ≤20 mmHg, GCS ≥5, age ≤60 years, and bone flap ≥130 cm(2) and those with ICP >20 mmHg, GCS <5, age >60 years, and bone flap <130 cm(2), was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although the application of DC in severe TBI is controversial and the population in this study is small, our study demonstrates the threshold of the specific factors (patient age, ICP and GCS on the day of the surgery and the size of the bone flap) which may help in the decision of performing DC. Furthermore, this study proves that the different combinations and mainly at the same time involvement of all prognostic parameters (age <60, GCS <5, bone flap ≥130 cm(2), and ICP ≤20 at time of DC surgery) allow a better outcome. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4774169/ /pubmed/26981320 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.176671 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fotakopoulos, George
Tsianaka, Eleni
Vagkopoulos, Konstantinos
Fountas, Kostas N.
According to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial
title According to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial
title_full According to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial
title_fullStr According to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial
title_full_unstemmed According to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial
title_short According to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial
title_sort according to which factors in severe traumatic brain injury craniectomy could be beneficial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981320
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.176671
work_keys_str_mv AT fotakopoulosgeorge accordingtowhichfactorsinseveretraumaticbraininjurycraniectomycouldbebeneficial
AT tsianakaeleni accordingtowhichfactorsinseveretraumaticbraininjurycraniectomycouldbebeneficial
AT vagkopouloskonstantinos accordingtowhichfactorsinseveretraumaticbraininjurycraniectomycouldbebeneficial
AT fountaskostasn accordingtowhichfactorsinseveretraumaticbraininjurycraniectomycouldbebeneficial