Cargando…

CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease

OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) must be improved before widespread clinical use. This study aimed to determine whether CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios are better diagnostic biomarkers of AD during both predementia and de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janelidze, Shorena, Zetterberg, Henrik, Mattsson, Niklas, Palmqvist, Sebastian, Vanderstichele, Hugo, Lindberg, Olof, van Westen, Danielle, Stomrud, Erik, Minthon, Lennart, Blennow, Kaj, Hansson, Oskar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27042676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.274
_version_ 1782418889433415680
author Janelidze, Shorena
Zetterberg, Henrik
Mattsson, Niklas
Palmqvist, Sebastian
Vanderstichele, Hugo
Lindberg, Olof
van Westen, Danielle
Stomrud, Erik
Minthon, Lennart
Blennow, Kaj
Hansson, Oskar
author_facet Janelidze, Shorena
Zetterberg, Henrik
Mattsson, Niklas
Palmqvist, Sebastian
Vanderstichele, Hugo
Lindberg, Olof
van Westen, Danielle
Stomrud, Erik
Minthon, Lennart
Blennow, Kaj
Hansson, Oskar
author_sort Janelidze, Shorena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) must be improved before widespread clinical use. This study aimed to determine whether CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios are better diagnostic biomarkers of AD during both predementia and dementia stages in comparison to CSF Aβ42 alone. METHODS: The study comprised three different cohorts (n = 1182) in whom CSF levels of Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ38 were assessed. CSF Aβs were quantified using three different immunoassays (Euroimmun, Meso Scale Discovery, Quanterix). As reference standard, we used either amyloid ((18)F‐flutemetamol) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (n = 215) or clinical diagnosis (n = 967) of well‐characterized patients. RESULTS: When using three different immunoassays in cases with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment, the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios were significantly better predictors of abnormal amyloid PET than CSF Aβ42. Lower Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40, and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios, but not Aβ40 and Aβ38, correlated with smaller hippocampal volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging. However, lower Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42, but not the ratios, correlated with non‐AD‐specific subcortical changes, that is, larger lateral ventricles and white matter lesions. Further, the Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios showed increased accuracy compared to Aβ42 when distinguishing AD from dementia with Lewy bodies or Parkinson's disease dementia and subcortical vascular dementia, where all Aβs (including Aβ42) were decreased. INTERPRETATION: The CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios are significantly better than CSF Aβ42 to detect brain amyloid deposition in prodromal AD and to differentiate AD dementia from non‐AD dementias. The ratios reflect AD‐type pathology better, whereas decline in CSF Aβ42 is also associated with non‐AD subcortical pathologies. These findings strongly suggest that the ratios rather than CSF Aβ42 should be used in the clinical work‐up of AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4774260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47742602016-04-01 CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease Janelidze, Shorena Zetterberg, Henrik Mattsson, Niklas Palmqvist, Sebastian Vanderstichele, Hugo Lindberg, Olof van Westen, Danielle Stomrud, Erik Minthon, Lennart Blennow, Kaj Hansson, Oskar Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) must be improved before widespread clinical use. This study aimed to determine whether CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios are better diagnostic biomarkers of AD during both predementia and dementia stages in comparison to CSF Aβ42 alone. METHODS: The study comprised three different cohorts (n = 1182) in whom CSF levels of Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ38 were assessed. CSF Aβs were quantified using three different immunoassays (Euroimmun, Meso Scale Discovery, Quanterix). As reference standard, we used either amyloid ((18)F‐flutemetamol) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (n = 215) or clinical diagnosis (n = 967) of well‐characterized patients. RESULTS: When using three different immunoassays in cases with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment, the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios were significantly better predictors of abnormal amyloid PET than CSF Aβ42. Lower Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40, and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios, but not Aβ40 and Aβ38, correlated with smaller hippocampal volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging. However, lower Aβ38, Aβ40, and Aβ42, but not the ratios, correlated with non‐AD‐specific subcortical changes, that is, larger lateral ventricles and white matter lesions. Further, the Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios showed increased accuracy compared to Aβ42 when distinguishing AD from dementia with Lewy bodies or Parkinson's disease dementia and subcortical vascular dementia, where all Aβs (including Aβ42) were decreased. INTERPRETATION: The CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios are significantly better than CSF Aβ42 to detect brain amyloid deposition in prodromal AD and to differentiate AD dementia from non‐AD dementias. The ratios reflect AD‐type pathology better, whereas decline in CSF Aβ42 is also associated with non‐AD subcortical pathologies. These findings strongly suggest that the ratios rather than CSF Aβ42 should be used in the clinical work‐up of AD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4774260/ /pubmed/27042676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.274 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Janelidze, Shorena
Zetterberg, Henrik
Mattsson, Niklas
Palmqvist, Sebastian
Vanderstichele, Hugo
Lindberg, Olof
van Westen, Danielle
Stomrud, Erik
Minthon, Lennart
Blennow, Kaj
Hansson, Oskar
CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease
title CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease
title_full CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease
title_fullStr CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease
title_full_unstemmed CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease
title_short CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease
title_sort csf aβ42/aβ40 and aβ42/aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of alzheimer disease
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27042676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.274
work_keys_str_mv AT janelidzeshorena csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT zetterberghenrik csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT mattssonniklas csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT palmqvistsebastian csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT vanderstichelehugo csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT lindbergolof csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT vanwestendanielle csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT stomruderik csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT minthonlennart csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT blennowkaj csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease
AT hanssonoskar csfab42ab40andab42ab38ratiosbetterdiagnosticmarkersofalzheimerdisease