Cargando…

A rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories

BACKGROUND: Surgical pathology is an integral part of diagnosis and management planning in patient care. In the absence of widespread automation, many small laboratories are unable to provide this service due to lack of time. Currently, the shortest processing schedule for formalin-fixed paraffin-em...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jali, Pramod K, Donoghue, Mandana, Gadiwan, Mohsin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26980957
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.174616
_version_ 1782418893901398016
author Jali, Pramod K
Donoghue, Mandana
Gadiwan, Mohsin
author_facet Jali, Pramod K
Donoghue, Mandana
Gadiwan, Mohsin
author_sort Jali, Pramod K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical pathology is an integral part of diagnosis and management planning in patient care. In the absence of widespread automation, many small laboratories are unable to provide this service due to lack of time. Currently, the shortest processing schedule for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues is 16 working hours; most small laboratories cannot complete the rapid schedules within the average 8–9 working hours. Thus, the availability of an 8–9 h processing schedule that provide satisfactory results can help many small laboratories in routinely providing surgical pathology services. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new rapid processing schedule and compare it with two existing rapid processing schedules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This animal study tested a new rapid processing schedule suggested by authors with overnight preprocessing in 60% isopropyl alcohol followed by an 8 h processing schedule. This was tested and compared with the rapid processing schedules described by Godkar's (11 h) and Bancroft's (2 working days). A routinely used automatic tissue processor long cycle (17 h) was the control. Each schedule was used on 20 tongue specimens. The prepared slides were evaluated for surface area and linear tissue shrinkage, ease of sectioning, quality of hematoxylin and eosin staining, histological appearance and artifacts. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found between schedules. Overall total average performance ranking placed Bancroft's schedule as the best with only 27.9% of the sections processed and stained showing any shortcomings, followed closely by the test schedule suggested by authors (28.7%), Godkar's (31.8%) and the automatic processor schedule/control (33.3%). CONCLUSION: The test results indicated that the schedule devised by authors is an effective rapid processing cycle that produces diagnostic quality histological results when compared with other conventional processing schedules for small tissue blocks (average 6 mm × 8 mm).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4774282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47742822016-03-15 A rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories Jali, Pramod K Donoghue, Mandana Gadiwan, Mohsin J Oral Maxillofac Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND: Surgical pathology is an integral part of diagnosis and management planning in patient care. In the absence of widespread automation, many small laboratories are unable to provide this service due to lack of time. Currently, the shortest processing schedule for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues is 16 working hours; most small laboratories cannot complete the rapid schedules within the average 8–9 working hours. Thus, the availability of an 8–9 h processing schedule that provide satisfactory results can help many small laboratories in routinely providing surgical pathology services. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new rapid processing schedule and compare it with two existing rapid processing schedules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This animal study tested a new rapid processing schedule suggested by authors with overnight preprocessing in 60% isopropyl alcohol followed by an 8 h processing schedule. This was tested and compared with the rapid processing schedules described by Godkar's (11 h) and Bancroft's (2 working days). A routinely used automatic tissue processor long cycle (17 h) was the control. Each schedule was used on 20 tongue specimens. The prepared slides were evaluated for surface area and linear tissue shrinkage, ease of sectioning, quality of hematoxylin and eosin staining, histological appearance and artifacts. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found between schedules. Overall total average performance ranking placed Bancroft's schedule as the best with only 27.9% of the sections processed and stained showing any shortcomings, followed closely by the test schedule suggested by authors (28.7%), Godkar's (31.8%) and the automatic processor schedule/control (33.3%). CONCLUSION: The test results indicated that the schedule devised by authors is an effective rapid processing cycle that produces diagnostic quality histological results when compared with other conventional processing schedules for small tissue blocks (average 6 mm × 8 mm). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4774282/ /pubmed/26980957 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.174616 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jali, Pramod K
Donoghue, Mandana
Gadiwan, Mohsin
A rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories
title A rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories
title_full A rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories
title_fullStr A rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories
title_full_unstemmed A rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories
title_short A rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories
title_sort rapid manual processing technique for resource-limited small laboratories
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26980957
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.174616
work_keys_str_mv AT jalipramodk arapidmanualprocessingtechniqueforresourcelimitedsmalllaboratories
AT donoghuemandana arapidmanualprocessingtechniqueforresourcelimitedsmalllaboratories
AT gadiwanmohsin arapidmanualprocessingtechniqueforresourcelimitedsmalllaboratories
AT jalipramodk rapidmanualprocessingtechniqueforresourcelimitedsmalllaboratories
AT donoghuemandana rapidmanualprocessingtechniqueforresourcelimitedsmalllaboratories
AT gadiwanmohsin rapidmanualprocessingtechniqueforresourcelimitedsmalllaboratories