Cargando…

Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena

Inequitable healthcare access, experiences and outcomes across ethnic groups are of concern across many countries. Progress on this agenda appears limited in England given the apparently strong legal and policy framework. This disjuncture raises questions about how central government policy is trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salway, Sarah, Mir, Ghazala, Turner, Daniel, Ellison, George T.H., Carter, Lynne, Gerrish, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26851409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.031
_version_ 1782418917239554048
author Salway, Sarah
Mir, Ghazala
Turner, Daniel
Ellison, George T.H.
Carter, Lynne
Gerrish, Kate
author_facet Salway, Sarah
Mir, Ghazala
Turner, Daniel
Ellison, George T.H.
Carter, Lynne
Gerrish, Kate
author_sort Salway, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Inequitable healthcare access, experiences and outcomes across ethnic groups are of concern across many countries. Progress on this agenda appears limited in England given the apparently strong legal and policy framework. This disjuncture raises questions about how central government policy is translated into local services. Healthcare commissioning organisations are a potentially powerful influence on services, but have rarely been examined from an equity perspective. We undertook a mixed method exploration of English Primary Care Trust (PCT) commissioning in 2010–12, to identify barriers and enablers to commissioning that addresses ethnic healthcare inequities, employing:- in-depth interviews with 19 national Key Informants; documentation of 10 good practice examples; detailed case studies of three PCTs (70+ interviews; extensive observational work and documentary analysis); three national stakeholder workshops. We found limited and patchy attention to ethnic diversity and inequity within English healthcare commissioning. Marginalization of this agenda, along with ambivalence, a lack of clarity and limited confidence, perpetuated a reinforcing inter-play between individual managers, their organisational setting and the wider policy context. Despite the apparent contrary indications, ethnic equity was a peripheral concern within national healthcare policy; poorly aligned with other more dominant agendas. Locally, consideration of ethnicity was often treated as a matter of legal compliance rather than integral to understanding and meeting healthcare needs. Many managers and teams did not consider tackling ethnic healthcare inequities to be part-and-parcel of their job, lacked confidence and skills to do so, and questioned the legitimacy of such work. Our findings indicate the need to enhance the skills, confidence and competence of individual managers and commissioning teams and to improve organizational structures and processes that support attention to ethnic inequity. Greater political will and clearer national direction is also required to produce the system change needed to embed action on ethnic inequity within healthcare commissioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4774476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Pergamon
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47744762016-03-14 Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena Salway, Sarah Mir, Ghazala Turner, Daniel Ellison, George T.H. Carter, Lynne Gerrish, Kate Soc Sci Med Article Inequitable healthcare access, experiences and outcomes across ethnic groups are of concern across many countries. Progress on this agenda appears limited in England given the apparently strong legal and policy framework. This disjuncture raises questions about how central government policy is translated into local services. Healthcare commissioning organisations are a potentially powerful influence on services, but have rarely been examined from an equity perspective. We undertook a mixed method exploration of English Primary Care Trust (PCT) commissioning in 2010–12, to identify barriers and enablers to commissioning that addresses ethnic healthcare inequities, employing:- in-depth interviews with 19 national Key Informants; documentation of 10 good practice examples; detailed case studies of three PCTs (70+ interviews; extensive observational work and documentary analysis); three national stakeholder workshops. We found limited and patchy attention to ethnic diversity and inequity within English healthcare commissioning. Marginalization of this agenda, along with ambivalence, a lack of clarity and limited confidence, perpetuated a reinforcing inter-play between individual managers, their organisational setting and the wider policy context. Despite the apparent contrary indications, ethnic equity was a peripheral concern within national healthcare policy; poorly aligned with other more dominant agendas. Locally, consideration of ethnicity was often treated as a matter of legal compliance rather than integral to understanding and meeting healthcare needs. Many managers and teams did not consider tackling ethnic healthcare inequities to be part-and-parcel of their job, lacked confidence and skills to do so, and questioned the legitimacy of such work. Our findings indicate the need to enhance the skills, confidence and competence of individual managers and commissioning teams and to improve organizational structures and processes that support attention to ethnic inequity. Greater political will and clearer national direction is also required to produce the system change needed to embed action on ethnic inequity within healthcare commissioning. Pergamon 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4774476/ /pubmed/26851409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.031 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Salway, Sarah
Mir, Ghazala
Turner, Daniel
Ellison, George T.H.
Carter, Lynne
Gerrish, Kate
Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena
title Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena
title_full Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena
title_fullStr Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena
title_full_unstemmed Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena
title_short Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena
title_sort obstacles to “race equality” in the english national health service: insights from the healthcare commissioning arena
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26851409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.031
work_keys_str_mv AT salwaysarah obstaclestoraceequalityintheenglishnationalhealthserviceinsightsfromthehealthcarecommissioningarena
AT mirghazala obstaclestoraceequalityintheenglishnationalhealthserviceinsightsfromthehealthcarecommissioningarena
AT turnerdaniel obstaclestoraceequalityintheenglishnationalhealthserviceinsightsfromthehealthcarecommissioningarena
AT ellisongeorgeth obstaclestoraceequalityintheenglishnationalhealthserviceinsightsfromthehealthcarecommissioningarena
AT carterlynne obstaclestoraceequalityintheenglishnationalhealthserviceinsightsfromthehealthcarecommissioningarena
AT gerrishkate obstaclestoraceequalityintheenglishnationalhealthserviceinsightsfromthehealthcarecommissioningarena