Cargando…

The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits

AIM: To evaluate the macroscopic and histologic effects of pregabalin (PG) gabapentin (GB) on longitudinal intestinal wound healing in New Zealand rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The animals were divided into three groups randomly; the control group (n=6), PG group (n=6) and GB group (n=6). All anim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korkmaz, M., Saritas, T. B., Sevimli, A., Saritas, Z. K., Elitok, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047085
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.279-283
_version_ 1782418973651894272
author Korkmaz, M.
Saritas, T. B.
Sevimli, A.
Saritas, Z. K.
Elitok, B.
author_facet Korkmaz, M.
Saritas, T. B.
Sevimli, A.
Saritas, Z. K.
Elitok, B.
author_sort Korkmaz, M.
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the macroscopic and histologic effects of pregabalin (PG) gabapentin (GB) on longitudinal intestinal wound healing in New Zealand rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The animals were divided into three groups randomly; the control group (n=6), PG group (n=6) and GB group (n=6). All animals were premedicated with xylazine HCI, 5 mg/kg i.m. and general anaesthesia was performed by ketamine HCI 50 mg/kg i.m injection. A 4 cm incision in the caecum through median laparotomy was achieved under aseptic surgery. Intestinal wound was closed with double-sutured. All animals were received parenteral antibiotic treatment for 5 days. PG and GB groups were treated by PG (30 mg/kg, oral, daily) and GB (30 mg/kg, oral, daily) for 10 days respectively. Control group did not receive any treatment. The animals were euthanized on day 10 and the caecum was examined by laparotomy. Adhesion formation was observed, and tissue samples were taken from suture lines for histologic examination. Cellular infiltration (polymorphonuclear white blood cells and mononuclear cells), accumulation of connective tissue, vascularization and extent of necrosis were evaluated and scored separately for each of mucosal, submucosal, muscular and serosal layers of caecum. RESULTS: Adhesions were more severe in the GB group compared to other groups. No statistically significant differences were detected among the three groups about the wound healing. CONCLUSION: It was suggested that the use of gabapentinoids had no significant effect on wound healing in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery and further studies with treatment periods longer than 10 days are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4774831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47748312016-04-04 The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits Korkmaz, M. Saritas, T. B. Sevimli, A. Saritas, Z. K. Elitok, B. Vet World Research Article AIM: To evaluate the macroscopic and histologic effects of pregabalin (PG) gabapentin (GB) on longitudinal intestinal wound healing in New Zealand rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The animals were divided into three groups randomly; the control group (n=6), PG group (n=6) and GB group (n=6). All animals were premedicated with xylazine HCI, 5 mg/kg i.m. and general anaesthesia was performed by ketamine HCI 50 mg/kg i.m injection. A 4 cm incision in the caecum through median laparotomy was achieved under aseptic surgery. Intestinal wound was closed with double-sutured. All animals were received parenteral antibiotic treatment for 5 days. PG and GB groups were treated by PG (30 mg/kg, oral, daily) and GB (30 mg/kg, oral, daily) for 10 days respectively. Control group did not receive any treatment. The animals were euthanized on day 10 and the caecum was examined by laparotomy. Adhesion formation was observed, and tissue samples were taken from suture lines for histologic examination. Cellular infiltration (polymorphonuclear white blood cells and mononuclear cells), accumulation of connective tissue, vascularization and extent of necrosis were evaluated and scored separately for each of mucosal, submucosal, muscular and serosal layers of caecum. RESULTS: Adhesions were more severe in the GB group compared to other groups. No statistically significant differences were detected among the three groups about the wound healing. CONCLUSION: It was suggested that the use of gabapentinoids had no significant effect on wound healing in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery and further studies with treatment periods longer than 10 days are needed. Veterinary World 2015-03 2015-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4774831/ /pubmed/27047085 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.279-283 Text en Copyright: © The authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This article is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributin License (http://creative commons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Korkmaz, M.
Saritas, T. B.
Sevimli, A.
Saritas, Z. K.
Elitok, B.
The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits
title The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits
title_full The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits
title_fullStr The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits
title_full_unstemmed The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits
title_short The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits
title_sort effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4774831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27047085
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.279-283
work_keys_str_mv AT korkmazm theeffectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT saritastb theeffectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT sevimlia theeffectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT saritaszk theeffectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT elitokb theeffectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT korkmazm effectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT saritastb effectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT sevimlia effectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT saritaszk effectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits
AT elitokb effectofgabapentinandpregabalinonintestinalincisionwoundhealinginrabbits