Cargando…

KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of total knee arthoplasty revisions performed in high complexity cases, with large bone defects or serious ligament deficiencies using a constrained implant hinge associated to a rotating tibial basis. METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients in which we used the constrai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angelini, Fabio Jansen, Helito, Camilo Partezani, Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo, Guimarães, Tales Mollica, Pécora, José Ricardo, Demange, Marco Kawamura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220162401153984
_version_ 1782419033919848448
author Angelini, Fabio Jansen
Helito, Camilo Partezani
Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo
Guimarães, Tales Mollica
Pécora, José Ricardo
Demange, Marco Kawamura
author_facet Angelini, Fabio Jansen
Helito, Camilo Partezani
Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo
Guimarães, Tales Mollica
Pécora, José Ricardo
Demange, Marco Kawamura
author_sort Angelini, Fabio Jansen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of total knee arthoplasty revisions performed in high complexity cases, with large bone defects or serious ligament deficiencies using a constrained implant hinge associated to a rotating tibial basis. METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients in which we used the constrained implant hinge associated to rotating tibial basis, with minimum follow-up of two years. The indications for the procedure included instability, septic loosening, late postoperative infection without loosening and periprosthetic fracture. We evaluated the knee range of movement and functional outcomes by the Knee Society Score (KSS) e Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), besides the presence of complications. RESULTS: All patients achieved 5(o) to 85(o) minimum range of motion at 1 year postoperatively and, in the present evaluation, KSS ranged from 67 to 95. Three patients had no complications until the last evaluation and two patients required implant revision. CONCLUSION: Despite the complications rate observed, the functional result were acceptable for most patients, and it proved being a viable alternative, especially for patients with low functional demand. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4775484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47754842016-03-18 KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS Angelini, Fabio Jansen Helito, Camilo Partezani Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo Guimarães, Tales Mollica Pécora, José Ricardo Demange, Marco Kawamura Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of total knee arthoplasty revisions performed in high complexity cases, with large bone defects or serious ligament deficiencies using a constrained implant hinge associated to a rotating tibial basis. METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients in which we used the constrained implant hinge associated to rotating tibial basis, with minimum follow-up of two years. The indications for the procedure included instability, septic loosening, late postoperative infection without loosening and periprosthetic fracture. We evaluated the knee range of movement and functional outcomes by the Knee Society Score (KSS) e Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), besides the presence of complications. RESULTS: All patients achieved 5(o) to 85(o) minimum range of motion at 1 year postoperatively and, in the present evaluation, KSS ranged from 67 to 95. Three patients had no complications until the last evaluation and two patients required implant revision. CONCLUSION: Despite the complications rate observed, the functional result were acceptable for most patients, and it proved being a viable alternative, especially for patients with low functional demand. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4775484/ /pubmed/26997909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220162401153984 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Angelini, Fabio Jansen
Helito, Camilo Partezani
Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo
Guimarães, Tales Mollica
Pécora, José Ricardo
Demange, Marco Kawamura
KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
title KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
title_full KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
title_fullStr KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
title_full_unstemmed KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
title_short KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
title_sort knee arthroplasty revision with a constrained implant using hinge and rotating tibial basis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220162401153984
work_keys_str_mv AT angelinifabiojansen kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis
AT helitocamilopartezani kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis
AT veronesibrunoazevedo kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis
AT guimaraestalesmollica kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis
AT pecorajosericardo kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis
AT demangemarcokawamura kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis