Cargando…
KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of total knee arthoplasty revisions performed in high complexity cases, with large bone defects or serious ligament deficiencies using a constrained implant hinge associated to a rotating tibial basis. METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients in which we used the constrai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220162401153984 |
_version_ | 1782419033919848448 |
---|---|
author | Angelini, Fabio Jansen Helito, Camilo Partezani Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo Guimarães, Tales Mollica Pécora, José Ricardo Demange, Marco Kawamura |
author_facet | Angelini, Fabio Jansen Helito, Camilo Partezani Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo Guimarães, Tales Mollica Pécora, José Ricardo Demange, Marco Kawamura |
author_sort | Angelini, Fabio Jansen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of total knee arthoplasty revisions performed in high complexity cases, with large bone defects or serious ligament deficiencies using a constrained implant hinge associated to a rotating tibial basis. METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients in which we used the constrained implant hinge associated to rotating tibial basis, with minimum follow-up of two years. The indications for the procedure included instability, septic loosening, late postoperative infection without loosening and periprosthetic fracture. We evaluated the knee range of movement and functional outcomes by the Knee Society Score (KSS) e Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), besides the presence of complications. RESULTS: All patients achieved 5(o) to 85(o) minimum range of motion at 1 year postoperatively and, in the present evaluation, KSS ranged from 67 to 95. Three patients had no complications until the last evaluation and two patients required implant revision. CONCLUSION: Despite the complications rate observed, the functional result were acceptable for most patients, and it proved being a viable alternative, especially for patients with low functional demand. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4775484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47754842016-03-18 KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS Angelini, Fabio Jansen Helito, Camilo Partezani Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo Guimarães, Tales Mollica Pécora, José Ricardo Demange, Marco Kawamura Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of total knee arthoplasty revisions performed in high complexity cases, with large bone defects or serious ligament deficiencies using a constrained implant hinge associated to a rotating tibial basis. METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients in which we used the constrained implant hinge associated to rotating tibial basis, with minimum follow-up of two years. The indications for the procedure included instability, septic loosening, late postoperative infection without loosening and periprosthetic fracture. We evaluated the knee range of movement and functional outcomes by the Knee Society Score (KSS) e Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), besides the presence of complications. RESULTS: All patients achieved 5(o) to 85(o) minimum range of motion at 1 year postoperatively and, in the present evaluation, KSS ranged from 67 to 95. Three patients had no complications until the last evaluation and two patients required implant revision. CONCLUSION: Despite the complications rate observed, the functional result were acceptable for most patients, and it proved being a viable alternative, especially for patients with low functional demand. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4775484/ /pubmed/26997909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220162401153984 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Angelini, Fabio Jansen Helito, Camilo Partezani Veronesi, Bruno Azevedo Guimarães, Tales Mollica Pécora, José Ricardo Demange, Marco Kawamura KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS |
title | KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS |
title_full | KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS |
title_fullStr | KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS |
title_full_unstemmed | KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS |
title_short | KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS |
title_sort | knee arthroplasty revision with a constrained implant using hinge and rotating tibial basis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220162401153984 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angelinifabiojansen kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis AT helitocamilopartezani kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis AT veronesibrunoazevedo kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis AT guimaraestalesmollica kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis AT pecorajosericardo kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis AT demangemarcokawamura kneearthroplastyrevisionwithaconstrainedimplantusinghingeandrotatingtibialbasis |