Cargando…

Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans

BACKGROUND: MR headphones are attenuation sources affecting PET quantification in hybrid PET/MRI. Despite potentially better patient communication, usage in PET/MRI scans is not approved by the vendor. This study aims to determine the impact of headphones on PET by means of phantom and patient scans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Büther, Florian, Vrachimis, Alexis, Becker, Anne, Stegger, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0178-7
_version_ 1782419046181896192
author Büther, Florian
Vrachimis, Alexis
Becker, Anne
Stegger, Lars
author_facet Büther, Florian
Vrachimis, Alexis
Becker, Anne
Stegger, Lars
author_sort Büther, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: MR headphones are attenuation sources affecting PET quantification in hybrid PET/MRI. Despite potentially better patient communication, usage in PET/MRI scans is not approved by the vendor. This study aims to determine the impact of headphones on PET by means of phantom and patient scans. Additionally, the perceived benefit of using headphones was evaluated. FINDINGS: A cylinder phantom was scanned without and with dedicated MR headphones in a PET/CT scanner. Headphone attenuation was additionally assessed in a clinical setup in 10 patients on a PET/MR scanner using F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose. The difference in tracer uptake with and without headset was determined for the various brain regions. Additionally, the patients were asked for differences in noise levels, patient comfort, communication quality, and preference. CT data revealed headphone attenuation values of 350–500 HU. Neglecting headphone attenuation leads to a decrease in PET values between the earcups of about 11 % when compared to the correctly reconstructed data. Regions further away from the headphones were less affected. Patient images demonstrated a decrease of 11 % on average in the cerebellum and temporal lobes, while other regions were less affected. No visual artefacts in the images were noticed. On average, no advantage in terms of noise and patient comfort and only slightly better quality of communication were imparted by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using headphones during PET/MR acquisition leads to a negative bias in brain uptake values without introducing obvious image artefacts. Since they lack benefits for the patients, they should be avoided if PET quantification of the brain is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4775719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47757192016-03-22 Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans Büther, Florian Vrachimis, Alexis Becker, Anne Stegger, Lars EJNMMI Res Short Communication BACKGROUND: MR headphones are attenuation sources affecting PET quantification in hybrid PET/MRI. Despite potentially better patient communication, usage in PET/MRI scans is not approved by the vendor. This study aims to determine the impact of headphones on PET by means of phantom and patient scans. Additionally, the perceived benefit of using headphones was evaluated. FINDINGS: A cylinder phantom was scanned without and with dedicated MR headphones in a PET/CT scanner. Headphone attenuation was additionally assessed in a clinical setup in 10 patients on a PET/MR scanner using F-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose. The difference in tracer uptake with and without headset was determined for the various brain regions. Additionally, the patients were asked for differences in noise levels, patient comfort, communication quality, and preference. CT data revealed headphone attenuation values of 350–500 HU. Neglecting headphone attenuation leads to a decrease in PET values between the earcups of about 11 % when compared to the correctly reconstructed data. Regions further away from the headphones were less affected. Patient images demonstrated a decrease of 11 % on average in the cerebellum and temporal lobes, while other regions were less affected. No visual artefacts in the images were noticed. On average, no advantage in terms of noise and patient comfort and only slightly better quality of communication were imparted by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using headphones during PET/MR acquisition leads to a negative bias in brain uptake values without introducing obvious image artefacts. Since they lack benefits for the patients, they should be avoided if PET quantification of the brain is needed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4775719/ /pubmed/26936769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0178-7 Text en © Büther et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Büther, Florian
Vrachimis, Alexis
Becker, Anne
Stegger, Lars
Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans
title Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans
title_full Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans
title_fullStr Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans
title_full_unstemmed Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans
title_short Impact of MR-safe headphones on PET attenuation in combined PET/MRI scans
title_sort impact of mr-safe headphones on pet attenuation in combined pet/mri scans
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0178-7
work_keys_str_mv AT butherflorian impactofmrsafeheadphonesonpetattenuationincombinedpetmriscans
AT vrachimisalexis impactofmrsafeheadphonesonpetattenuationincombinedpetmriscans
AT beckeranne impactofmrsafeheadphonesonpetattenuationincombinedpetmriscans
AT steggerlars impactofmrsafeheadphonesonpetattenuationincombinedpetmriscans