Cargando…

Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION: Accurate localisation is an essential component for the delivery of intracranial stereotactic treatment. For fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, we compared the daily localisation accuracy of a standard thermoplastic mask with a new maxillary fixation device (MFD). METHODS: Daily p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Majella, Owen, Rebecca, Bernard, Anne, Moutrie, Vaughan, Foote, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.142
_version_ 1782419066960478208
author Russo, Majella
Owen, Rebecca
Bernard, Anne
Moutrie, Vaughan
Foote, Matthew
author_facet Russo, Majella
Owen, Rebecca
Bernard, Anne
Moutrie, Vaughan
Foote, Matthew
author_sort Russo, Majella
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accurate localisation is an essential component for the delivery of intracranial stereotactic treatment. For fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, we compared the daily localisation accuracy of a standard thermoplastic mask with a new maxillary fixation device (MFD). METHODS: Daily pre‐treatment kV cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 23 patients (12 localised in the MFD and 11 in the mask) with benign skull‐based lesions were reviewed retrospectively. The set up accuracy was measured in 6° of freedom, to ascertain both individual and population random and systematic errors. The appropriate clinical target volume to planning target volume margin was computed from set up error data. RESULTS: A total of 682 CBCT scans were evaluated. Systematic (Σ) and random (σ) population errors were Σ = 0.8 mm, 0.2 mm and 0.2 mm and σ = 0.3 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, for the standard mask in the left/right (LR), superior/inferior (SI), and anterior/posterior (AP) translational planes, and Σ = 0.2 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm and σ = 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, for the MFD. There was a reduction in rotation errors in the MFD compared to the mask. Margin calculations suggested an isotropic margin could be safely reduced to 2 mm for the MFD. CONCLUSION: The two devices demonstrate similar daily positional accuracy for fractionated stereotactic treatment of intracranial lesions. Combined with daily image guidance and couch correction, either of these devices is a viable frameless option for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4775825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47758252016-04-15 Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy Russo, Majella Owen, Rebecca Bernard, Anne Moutrie, Vaughan Foote, Matthew J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Accurate localisation is an essential component for the delivery of intracranial stereotactic treatment. For fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, we compared the daily localisation accuracy of a standard thermoplastic mask with a new maxillary fixation device (MFD). METHODS: Daily pre‐treatment kV cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 23 patients (12 localised in the MFD and 11 in the mask) with benign skull‐based lesions were reviewed retrospectively. The set up accuracy was measured in 6° of freedom, to ascertain both individual and population random and systematic errors. The appropriate clinical target volume to planning target volume margin was computed from set up error data. RESULTS: A total of 682 CBCT scans were evaluated. Systematic (Σ) and random (σ) population errors were Σ = 0.8 mm, 0.2 mm and 0.2 mm and σ = 0.3 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, for the standard mask in the left/right (LR), superior/inferior (SI), and anterior/posterior (AP) translational planes, and Σ = 0.2 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm and σ = 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, for the MFD. There was a reduction in rotation errors in the MFD compared to the mask. Margin calculations suggested an isotropic margin could be safely reduced to 2 mm for the MFD. CONCLUSION: The two devices demonstrate similar daily positional accuracy for fractionated stereotactic treatment of intracranial lesions. Combined with daily image guidance and couch correction, either of these devices is a viable frameless option for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-22 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4775825/ /pubmed/27087974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.142 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Russo, Majella
Owen, Rebecca
Bernard, Anne
Moutrie, Vaughan
Foote, Matthew
Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy
title Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy
title_full Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy
title_short Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy
title_sort evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.142
work_keys_str_mv AT russomajella evaluationofaccuracyandreproducibilityofarelocatablemaxillaryfixationsystemforfractionatedintracranialstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT owenrebecca evaluationofaccuracyandreproducibilityofarelocatablemaxillaryfixationsystemforfractionatedintracranialstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT bernardanne evaluationofaccuracyandreproducibilityofarelocatablemaxillaryfixationsystemforfractionatedintracranialstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT moutrievaughan evaluationofaccuracyandreproducibilityofarelocatablemaxillaryfixationsystemforfractionatedintracranialstereotacticradiationtherapy
AT footematthew evaluationofaccuracyandreproducibilityofarelocatablemaxillaryfixationsystemforfractionatedintracranialstereotacticradiationtherapy