Cargando…
Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy
INTRODUCTION: Time‐consuming manual methods have been required to register cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with plans in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system in order to replicate delivered treatments for adaptive radiotherapy. These methods rely on fiducial marker (FM) placement du...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.141 |
_version_ | 1782419067680849920 |
---|---|
author | Hargrave, Catriona Mason, Nicole Guidi, Robyn Miller, Julie‐Anne Becker, Jillian Moores, Matthew Mengersen, Kerrie Poulsen, Michael Harden, Fiona |
author_facet | Hargrave, Catriona Mason, Nicole Guidi, Robyn Miller, Julie‐Anne Becker, Jillian Moores, Matthew Mengersen, Kerrie Poulsen, Michael Harden, Fiona |
author_sort | Hargrave, Catriona |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Time‐consuming manual methods have been required to register cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with plans in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system in order to replicate delivered treatments for adaptive radiotherapy. These methods rely on fiducial marker (FM) placement during CBCT acquisition or the image mid‐point to localise the image isocentre. A quality assurance study was conducted to validate an automated CBCT‐plan registration method utilising the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Structure Set (RS) and Spatial Registration (RE) files created during online image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT). METHODS: CBCTs of a phantom were acquired with FMs and predetermined setup errors using various online IGRT workflows. The CBCTs, DICOM RS and RE files were imported into Pinnacle(3) plans of the phantom and the resulting automated CBCT‐plan registrations were compared to existing manual methods. A clinical protocol for the automated method was subsequently developed and tested retrospectively using CBCTs and plans for six bladder patients. RESULTS: The automated CBCT‐plan registration method was successfully applied to thirty‐four phantom CBCT images acquired with an online 0 mm action level workflow. Ten CBCTs acquired with other IGRT workflows required manual workarounds. This was addressed during the development and testing of the clinical protocol using twenty‐eight patient CBCTs. The automated CBCT‐plan registrations were instantaneous, replicating delivered treatments in Pinnacle(3) with errors of ±0.5 mm. These errors were comparable to mid‐point‐dependant manual registrations but superior to FM‐dependant manual registrations. CONCLUSION: The automated CBCT‐plan registration method quickly and reliably replicates delivered treatments in Pinnacle(3) for adaptive radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4775828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47758282016-04-15 Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy Hargrave, Catriona Mason, Nicole Guidi, Robyn Miller, Julie‐Anne Becker, Jillian Moores, Matthew Mengersen, Kerrie Poulsen, Michael Harden, Fiona J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Time‐consuming manual methods have been required to register cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with plans in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system in order to replicate delivered treatments for adaptive radiotherapy. These methods rely on fiducial marker (FM) placement during CBCT acquisition or the image mid‐point to localise the image isocentre. A quality assurance study was conducted to validate an automated CBCT‐plan registration method utilising the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Structure Set (RS) and Spatial Registration (RE) files created during online image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT). METHODS: CBCTs of a phantom were acquired with FMs and predetermined setup errors using various online IGRT workflows. The CBCTs, DICOM RS and RE files were imported into Pinnacle(3) plans of the phantom and the resulting automated CBCT‐plan registrations were compared to existing manual methods. A clinical protocol for the automated method was subsequently developed and tested retrospectively using CBCTs and plans for six bladder patients. RESULTS: The automated CBCT‐plan registration method was successfully applied to thirty‐four phantom CBCT images acquired with an online 0 mm action level workflow. Ten CBCTs acquired with other IGRT workflows required manual workarounds. This was addressed during the development and testing of the clinical protocol using twenty‐eight patient CBCTs. The automated CBCT‐plan registrations were instantaneous, replicating delivered treatments in Pinnacle(3) with errors of ±0.5 mm. These errors were comparable to mid‐point‐dependant manual registrations but superior to FM‐dependant manual registrations. CONCLUSION: The automated CBCT‐plan registration method quickly and reliably replicates delivered treatments in Pinnacle(3) for adaptive radiotherapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-03 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4775828/ /pubmed/27087975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.141 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hargrave, Catriona Mason, Nicole Guidi, Robyn Miller, Julie‐Anne Becker, Jillian Moores, Matthew Mengersen, Kerrie Poulsen, Michael Harden, Fiona Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy |
title | Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy |
title_full | Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy |
title_short | Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy |
title_sort | automated replication of cone beam ct‐guided treatments in the pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hargravecatriona automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy AT masonnicole automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy AT guidirobyn automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy AT millerjulieanne automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy AT beckerjillian automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy AT mooresmatthew automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy AT mengersenkerrie automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy AT poulsenmichael automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy AT hardenfiona automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy |