Cargando…

Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION: Time‐consuming manual methods have been required to register cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with plans in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system in order to replicate delivered treatments for adaptive radiotherapy. These methods rely on fiducial marker (FM) placement du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hargrave, Catriona, Mason, Nicole, Guidi, Robyn, Miller, Julie‐Anne, Becker, Jillian, Moores, Matthew, Mengersen, Kerrie, Poulsen, Michael, Harden, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.141
_version_ 1782419067680849920
author Hargrave, Catriona
Mason, Nicole
Guidi, Robyn
Miller, Julie‐Anne
Becker, Jillian
Moores, Matthew
Mengersen, Kerrie
Poulsen, Michael
Harden, Fiona
author_facet Hargrave, Catriona
Mason, Nicole
Guidi, Robyn
Miller, Julie‐Anne
Becker, Jillian
Moores, Matthew
Mengersen, Kerrie
Poulsen, Michael
Harden, Fiona
author_sort Hargrave, Catriona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Time‐consuming manual methods have been required to register cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with plans in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system in order to replicate delivered treatments for adaptive radiotherapy. These methods rely on fiducial marker (FM) placement during CBCT acquisition or the image mid‐point to localise the image isocentre. A quality assurance study was conducted to validate an automated CBCT‐plan registration method utilising the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Structure Set (RS) and Spatial Registration (RE) files created during online image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT). METHODS: CBCTs of a phantom were acquired with FMs and predetermined setup errors using various online IGRT workflows. The CBCTs, DICOM RS and RE files were imported into Pinnacle(3) plans of the phantom and the resulting automated CBCT‐plan registrations were compared to existing manual methods. A clinical protocol for the automated method was subsequently developed and tested retrospectively using CBCTs and plans for six bladder patients. RESULTS: The automated CBCT‐plan registration method was successfully applied to thirty‐four phantom CBCT images acquired with an online 0 mm action level workflow. Ten CBCTs acquired with other IGRT workflows required manual workarounds. This was addressed during the development and testing of the clinical protocol using twenty‐eight patient CBCTs. The automated CBCT‐plan registrations were instantaneous, replicating delivered treatments in Pinnacle(3) with errors of ±0.5 mm. These errors were comparable to mid‐point‐dependant manual registrations but superior to FM‐dependant manual registrations. CONCLUSION: The automated CBCT‐plan registration method quickly and reliably replicates delivered treatments in Pinnacle(3) for adaptive radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4775828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47758282016-04-15 Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy Hargrave, Catriona Mason, Nicole Guidi, Robyn Miller, Julie‐Anne Becker, Jillian Moores, Matthew Mengersen, Kerrie Poulsen, Michael Harden, Fiona J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Time‐consuming manual methods have been required to register cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with plans in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system in order to replicate delivered treatments for adaptive radiotherapy. These methods rely on fiducial marker (FM) placement during CBCT acquisition or the image mid‐point to localise the image isocentre. A quality assurance study was conducted to validate an automated CBCT‐plan registration method utilising the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Structure Set (RS) and Spatial Registration (RE) files created during online image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT). METHODS: CBCTs of a phantom were acquired with FMs and predetermined setup errors using various online IGRT workflows. The CBCTs, DICOM RS and RE files were imported into Pinnacle(3) plans of the phantom and the resulting automated CBCT‐plan registrations were compared to existing manual methods. A clinical protocol for the automated method was subsequently developed and tested retrospectively using CBCTs and plans for six bladder patients. RESULTS: The automated CBCT‐plan registration method was successfully applied to thirty‐four phantom CBCT images acquired with an online 0 mm action level workflow. Ten CBCTs acquired with other IGRT workflows required manual workarounds. This was addressed during the development and testing of the clinical protocol using twenty‐eight patient CBCTs. The automated CBCT‐plan registrations were instantaneous, replicating delivered treatments in Pinnacle(3) with errors of ±0.5 mm. These errors were comparable to mid‐point‐dependant manual registrations but superior to FM‐dependant manual registrations. CONCLUSION: The automated CBCT‐plan registration method quickly and reliably replicates delivered treatments in Pinnacle(3) for adaptive radiotherapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-10-03 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4775828/ /pubmed/27087975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.141 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hargrave, Catriona
Mason, Nicole
Guidi, Robyn
Miller, Julie‐Anne
Becker, Jillian
Moores, Matthew
Mengersen, Kerrie
Poulsen, Michael
Harden, Fiona
Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy
title Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy
title_full Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy
title_fullStr Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy
title_short Automated replication of cone beam CT‐guided treatments in the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy
title_sort automated replication of cone beam ct‐guided treatments in the pinnacle(3) treatment planning system for adaptive radiotherapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4775828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.141
work_keys_str_mv AT hargravecatriona automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy
AT masonnicole automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy
AT guidirobyn automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy
AT millerjulieanne automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy
AT beckerjillian automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy
AT mooresmatthew automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy
AT mengersenkerrie automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy
AT poulsenmichael automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy
AT hardenfiona automatedreplicationofconebeamctguidedtreatmentsinthepinnacle3treatmentplanningsystemforadaptiveradiotherapy