Cargando…

Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants

Sensitivity to static changes in pitch has been shown to be poorer in school-aged children wearing cochlear implants (CIs) than children with normal hearing (NH), but it is unclear whether this is also the case for dynamic changes in pitch. Yet, dynamically changing pitch has considerable ecological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deroche, Mickael L. D., Kulkarni, Aditya M., Christensen, Julie A., Limb, Charles J., Chatterjee, Monita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00073
_version_ 1782419115639570432
author Deroche, Mickael L. D.
Kulkarni, Aditya M.
Christensen, Julie A.
Limb, Charles J.
Chatterjee, Monita
author_facet Deroche, Mickael L. D.
Kulkarni, Aditya M.
Christensen, Julie A.
Limb, Charles J.
Chatterjee, Monita
author_sort Deroche, Mickael L. D.
collection PubMed
description Sensitivity to static changes in pitch has been shown to be poorer in school-aged children wearing cochlear implants (CIs) than children with normal hearing (NH), but it is unclear whether this is also the case for dynamic changes in pitch. Yet, dynamically changing pitch has considerable ecological relevance in terms of natural speech, particularly aspects such as intonation, emotion, or lexical tone information. Twenty one children with NH and 23 children wearing a CI participated in this study, along with 18 NH adults and 6 CI adults for comparison. Listeners with CIs used their clinically assigned settings with envelope-based coding strategies. Percent correct was measured in one- or three-interval two-alternative forced choice tasks, for the direction or discrimination of harmonic complexes based on a linearly rising or falling fundamental frequency. Sweep rates were adjusted per subject, in a logarithmic scale, so as to cover the full extent of the psychometric function. Data for up- and down-sweeps were fitted separately, using a maximum-likelihood technique. Fits were similar for up- and down-sweeps in the discrimination task, but diverged in the direction task because psychometric functions for down-sweeps were very shallow. Hits and false alarms were then converted into d′ and beta values, from which a threshold was extracted at a d′ of 0.77. Thresholds were very consistent between the two tasks and considerably higher (worse) for CI listeners than for their NH peers. Thresholds were also higher for children than adults. Factors such as age at implantation, age at profound hearing loss, and duration of CI experience did not play any major role in this sensitivity. Thresholds of dynamic pitch sensitivity (in either task) also correlated with thresholds for static pitch sensitivity and with performance in tasks related to speech prosody.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4776214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47762142016-03-11 Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants Deroche, Mickael L. D. Kulkarni, Aditya M. Christensen, Julie A. Limb, Charles J. Chatterjee, Monita Front Neurosci Psychology Sensitivity to static changes in pitch has been shown to be poorer in school-aged children wearing cochlear implants (CIs) than children with normal hearing (NH), but it is unclear whether this is also the case for dynamic changes in pitch. Yet, dynamically changing pitch has considerable ecological relevance in terms of natural speech, particularly aspects such as intonation, emotion, or lexical tone information. Twenty one children with NH and 23 children wearing a CI participated in this study, along with 18 NH adults and 6 CI adults for comparison. Listeners with CIs used their clinically assigned settings with envelope-based coding strategies. Percent correct was measured in one- or three-interval two-alternative forced choice tasks, for the direction or discrimination of harmonic complexes based on a linearly rising or falling fundamental frequency. Sweep rates were adjusted per subject, in a logarithmic scale, so as to cover the full extent of the psychometric function. Data for up- and down-sweeps were fitted separately, using a maximum-likelihood technique. Fits were similar for up- and down-sweeps in the discrimination task, but diverged in the direction task because psychometric functions for down-sweeps were very shallow. Hits and false alarms were then converted into d′ and beta values, from which a threshold was extracted at a d′ of 0.77. Thresholds were very consistent between the two tasks and considerably higher (worse) for CI listeners than for their NH peers. Thresholds were also higher for children than adults. Factors such as age at implantation, age at profound hearing loss, and duration of CI experience did not play any major role in this sensitivity. Thresholds of dynamic pitch sensitivity (in either task) also correlated with thresholds for static pitch sensitivity and with performance in tasks related to speech prosody. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4776214/ /pubmed/26973451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00073 Text en Copyright © 2016 Deroche, Kulkarni, Christensen, Limb and Chatterjee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Deroche, Mickael L. D.
Kulkarni, Aditya M.
Christensen, Julie A.
Limb, Charles J.
Chatterjee, Monita
Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants
title Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants
title_full Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants
title_fullStr Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants
title_full_unstemmed Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants
title_short Deficits in the Sensitivity to Pitch Sweeps by School-Aged Children Wearing Cochlear Implants
title_sort deficits in the sensitivity to pitch sweeps by school-aged children wearing cochlear implants
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26973451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00073
work_keys_str_mv AT derochemickaelld deficitsinthesensitivitytopitchsweepsbyschoolagedchildrenwearingcochlearimplants
AT kulkarniadityam deficitsinthesensitivitytopitchsweepsbyschoolagedchildrenwearingcochlearimplants
AT christensenjuliea deficitsinthesensitivitytopitchsweepsbyschoolagedchildrenwearingcochlearimplants
AT limbcharlesj deficitsinthesensitivitytopitchsweepsbyschoolagedchildrenwearingcochlearimplants
AT chatterjeemonita deficitsinthesensitivitytopitchsweepsbyschoolagedchildrenwearingcochlearimplants