Cargando…

A cross-sectional study of 329 farms in England to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis

The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence rate of clinical mastitis (IRCM) and identify risk factors for clinical mastitis in suckler ewes to generate hypotheses for future study. A postal questionnaire was sent to 999 randomly selected English sheep farmers in 2010 to gather data on far...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, S., Huntley, S.J., Crump, R., Lovatt, F., Green, L.E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Scientific Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26809634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.012
_version_ 1782419186929106944
author Cooper, S.
Huntley, S.J.
Crump, R.
Lovatt, F.
Green, L.E.
author_facet Cooper, S.
Huntley, S.J.
Crump, R.
Lovatt, F.
Green, L.E.
author_sort Cooper, S.
collection PubMed
description The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence rate of clinical mastitis (IRCM) and identify risk factors for clinical mastitis in suckler ewes to generate hypotheses for future study. A postal questionnaire was sent to 999 randomly selected English sheep farmers in 2010 to gather data on farmer reported IRCM and flock management practices for the calendar year 2009, of which 329 provided usable information. The mean IRCM per flock was 1.2/100 ewes/year (CI:1.10:1.35). The IRCM was 2.0, 0.9 and 1.3/100 ewes/year for flocks that lambed indoors, outdoors and a combination of both, respectively. Farmers ran a variety of managements before, during and after lambing that were not comparable within one model, therefore six mixed effects over-dispersed Poisson regression models were developed. Factors significantly associated with increased IRCM were increasing percentage of the flock with poor udder conformation, increasing mean number of lambs reared/ewe and when some or all ewes lambed in barns compared with outdoors (Model 1). For ewes housed in barns before lambing (Model 2), concrete, earth and other materials were associated with an increase in IRCM compared with hardcore floors (an aggregate of broken bricks and stones). For ewes in barns during lambing (Model 3), an increase in IRCM was associated with concrete compared with hardcore flooring and where bedding was stored covered outdoors or in a building compared with bedding stored outdoors uncovered. For ewes in barns after lambing (Model 4), increased IRCM was associated with earth compared with hardcore floors, and when fresh bedding was added once per week compared with at a frequency of ≤2 days or twice/week. The IRCM was lower for flocks where some or all ewes remained in the same fields before, during and after lambing compared with flocks that did not (Model 5). Where ewes and lambs were turned outdoors after lambing (Model 6), the IRCM increased as the age of the oldest lambs at turnout increased. We conclude that the reported IRCM is low but highly variable and that the complexity of management of sheep around lambing limits the insight into generating hypotheses at flock level for risks for clinical mastitis across the whole industry. Whilst indoor production was generally associated with an increased IRCM, for ewes with large litter size indoor lambing was protective, we hypothesise that this is possibly because of better nutrition or reduced exposure to poor weather and factors associated with hygiene.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4776703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier Scientific Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47767032016-03-15 A cross-sectional study of 329 farms in England to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis Cooper, S. Huntley, S.J. Crump, R. Lovatt, F. Green, L.E. Prev Vet Med Article The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence rate of clinical mastitis (IRCM) and identify risk factors for clinical mastitis in suckler ewes to generate hypotheses for future study. A postal questionnaire was sent to 999 randomly selected English sheep farmers in 2010 to gather data on farmer reported IRCM and flock management practices for the calendar year 2009, of which 329 provided usable information. The mean IRCM per flock was 1.2/100 ewes/year (CI:1.10:1.35). The IRCM was 2.0, 0.9 and 1.3/100 ewes/year for flocks that lambed indoors, outdoors and a combination of both, respectively. Farmers ran a variety of managements before, during and after lambing that were not comparable within one model, therefore six mixed effects over-dispersed Poisson regression models were developed. Factors significantly associated with increased IRCM were increasing percentage of the flock with poor udder conformation, increasing mean number of lambs reared/ewe and when some or all ewes lambed in barns compared with outdoors (Model 1). For ewes housed in barns before lambing (Model 2), concrete, earth and other materials were associated with an increase in IRCM compared with hardcore floors (an aggregate of broken bricks and stones). For ewes in barns during lambing (Model 3), an increase in IRCM was associated with concrete compared with hardcore flooring and where bedding was stored covered outdoors or in a building compared with bedding stored outdoors uncovered. For ewes in barns after lambing (Model 4), increased IRCM was associated with earth compared with hardcore floors, and when fresh bedding was added once per week compared with at a frequency of ≤2 days or twice/week. The IRCM was lower for flocks where some or all ewes remained in the same fields before, during and after lambing compared with flocks that did not (Model 5). Where ewes and lambs were turned outdoors after lambing (Model 6), the IRCM increased as the age of the oldest lambs at turnout increased. We conclude that the reported IRCM is low but highly variable and that the complexity of management of sheep around lambing limits the insight into generating hypotheses at flock level for risks for clinical mastitis across the whole industry. Whilst indoor production was generally associated with an increased IRCM, for ewes with large litter size indoor lambing was protective, we hypothesise that this is possibly because of better nutrition or reduced exposure to poor weather and factors associated with hygiene. Elsevier Scientific Publishing 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4776703/ /pubmed/26809634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.012 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cooper, S.
Huntley, S.J.
Crump, R.
Lovatt, F.
Green, L.E.
A cross-sectional study of 329 farms in England to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis
title A cross-sectional study of 329 farms in England to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis
title_full A cross-sectional study of 329 farms in England to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study of 329 farms in England to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study of 329 farms in England to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis
title_short A cross-sectional study of 329 farms in England to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis
title_sort cross-sectional study of 329 farms in england to identify risk factors for ovine clinical mastitis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26809634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.012
work_keys_str_mv AT coopers acrosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT huntleysj acrosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT crumpr acrosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT lovattf acrosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT greenle acrosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT coopers crosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT huntleysj crosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT crumpr crosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT lovattf crosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis
AT greenle crosssectionalstudyof329farmsinenglandtoidentifyriskfactorsforovineclinicalmastitis