Cargando…

Process Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention Addressing Women in a Disadvantaged Setting

OBJECTIVES: This paper presents the process evaluation of a community-based randomized psycho-social trial aimed to enhance reproductive and mental health outcomes of disadvantaged women living in the southern suburb of Beirut-Lebanon. Process evaluation of public health interventions involves the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakkash, Rima, Kobeissi, Loulou, Ghantous, Zeina, Saad, Maya Abou, Khoury, Brigitte, Yassin, Nasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4777033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22980100
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v4n1p22
_version_ 1782419247927918592
author Nakkash, Rima
Kobeissi, Loulou
Ghantous, Zeina
Saad, Maya Abou
Khoury, Brigitte
Yassin, Nasser
author_facet Nakkash, Rima
Kobeissi, Loulou
Ghantous, Zeina
Saad, Maya Abou
Khoury, Brigitte
Yassin, Nasser
author_sort Nakkash, Rima
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This paper presents the process evaluation of a community-based randomized psycho-social trial aimed to enhance reproductive and mental health outcomes of disadvantaged women living in the southern suburb of Beirut-Lebanon. Process evaluation of public health interventions involves the monitoring and documentation of interventions’ implementation to allow for better understanding of planned outcomes and of intervention effectiveness. METHODS: A community-based randomized trial was conducted. The intervention consisted of 12 sessions (of combined 30 minutes of relaxation exercises and 75 minutes of structured support groups) delivered twice per week over a period of six-weeks. A process evaluation was conducted during the implementation of the intervention. This process evaluation aimed to ensure that the intervention was delivered and implemented as planned, as well as to monitor women’s satisfaction and attendance. The main components of the process evaluation included: dose delivered, dose received, and reach. Closed ended questionnaires were administered before/after/during each intervention session. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS. Analysis revolved around simple frequency distribution for categorical variables and means (SD) for continuous variables. Limited bivariate analysis (using CHI Square and Anova) was done. RESULTS: Results indicated that the delivery, implementation, and reach of the intervention were favorable. Participation was acceptable and satisfaction rates were very high. CONCLUSION: These favorable findings pertaining to intervention satisfaction, reach and participation highlight a number of lessons for future intervention studies in the context of disadvantaged settings. They also support the importance of involving the local community members in intervention planning, implementation and evaluation early on. We believe that the community involvement in this trial directly and significantly contributed to the results of this process evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4777033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47770332016-04-21 Process Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention Addressing Women in a Disadvantaged Setting Nakkash, Rima Kobeissi, Loulou Ghantous, Zeina Saad, Maya Abou Khoury, Brigitte Yassin, Nasser Glob J Health Sci Articles OBJECTIVES: This paper presents the process evaluation of a community-based randomized psycho-social trial aimed to enhance reproductive and mental health outcomes of disadvantaged women living in the southern suburb of Beirut-Lebanon. Process evaluation of public health interventions involves the monitoring and documentation of interventions’ implementation to allow for better understanding of planned outcomes and of intervention effectiveness. METHODS: A community-based randomized trial was conducted. The intervention consisted of 12 sessions (of combined 30 minutes of relaxation exercises and 75 minutes of structured support groups) delivered twice per week over a period of six-weeks. A process evaluation was conducted during the implementation of the intervention. This process evaluation aimed to ensure that the intervention was delivered and implemented as planned, as well as to monitor women’s satisfaction and attendance. The main components of the process evaluation included: dose delivered, dose received, and reach. Closed ended questionnaires were administered before/after/during each intervention session. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS. Analysis revolved around simple frequency distribution for categorical variables and means (SD) for continuous variables. Limited bivariate analysis (using CHI Square and Anova) was done. RESULTS: Results indicated that the delivery, implementation, and reach of the intervention were favorable. Participation was acceptable and satisfaction rates were very high. CONCLUSION: These favorable findings pertaining to intervention satisfaction, reach and participation highlight a number of lessons for future intervention studies in the context of disadvantaged settings. They also support the importance of involving the local community members in intervention planning, implementation and evaluation early on. We believe that the community involvement in this trial directly and significantly contributed to the results of this process evaluation. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2012-01 2012-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4777033/ /pubmed/22980100 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v4n1p22 Text en Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Nakkash, Rima
Kobeissi, Loulou
Ghantous, Zeina
Saad, Maya Abou
Khoury, Brigitte
Yassin, Nasser
Process Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention Addressing Women in a Disadvantaged Setting
title Process Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention Addressing Women in a Disadvantaged Setting
title_full Process Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention Addressing Women in a Disadvantaged Setting
title_fullStr Process Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention Addressing Women in a Disadvantaged Setting
title_full_unstemmed Process Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention Addressing Women in a Disadvantaged Setting
title_short Process Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention Addressing Women in a Disadvantaged Setting
title_sort process evaluation of a psychosocial intervention addressing women in a disadvantaged setting
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4777033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22980100
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v4n1p22
work_keys_str_mv AT nakkashrima processevaluationofapsychosocialinterventionaddressingwomeninadisadvantagedsetting
AT kobeissiloulou processevaluationofapsychosocialinterventionaddressingwomeninadisadvantagedsetting
AT ghantouszeina processevaluationofapsychosocialinterventionaddressingwomeninadisadvantagedsetting
AT saadmayaabou processevaluationofapsychosocialinterventionaddressingwomeninadisadvantagedsetting
AT khourybrigitte processevaluationofapsychosocialinterventionaddressingwomeninadisadvantagedsetting
AT yassinnasser processevaluationofapsychosocialinterventionaddressingwomeninadisadvantagedsetting