Cargando…

Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials demonstrate improving survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after treatment. However, it is unclear whether increased survival translates to a similar benefit in a real world setting. METHODS: We analyzed the overall survival of 347 multiple myeloma patients in A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willenbacher, Ella, Weger, Roman, Rochau, Ursula, Siebert, Uwe, Willenbacher, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4777410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147381
_version_ 1782419291809775616
author Willenbacher, Ella
Weger, Roman
Rochau, Ursula
Siebert, Uwe
Willenbacher, Wolfgang
author_facet Willenbacher, Ella
Weger, Roman
Rochau, Ursula
Siebert, Uwe
Willenbacher, Wolfgang
author_sort Willenbacher, Ella
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials demonstrate improving survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after treatment. However, it is unclear whether increased survival translates to a similar benefit in a real world setting. METHODS: We analyzed the overall survival of 347 multiple myeloma patients in Austria by means of a national registry (AMR), focused on results from 3(rd) and later lines of therapy. This benchmark was chosen to define a baseline prior to the broad application of upcoming 2(nd) generation drugs (carfilzomib, pomalidomide). RESULTS: Projected 10 years survival for patients with MM in Austria is estimated to be 56% in patients diagnosed in between the years 2011–2014, 21% in patients with a diagnosis made between 2000–2005, and 39% in those with a diagnosis made between 2006–2010). For the same intervals a significant increase in the use of both bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide—so called IMiDs (from 2005 onwards) and their simultaneous use in combination therapies (from 2010 onwards) could be shown. The use of autologous transplantation (ASCT) remained more or less constant at ~ 35% of patients in the 1(st) line setting over the whole period, comparing well to international practice patterns, while the use of 2(nd) line ASCT increased from 5.5% to 18.7% of patients. Patients in 3(rd) or later line treatment (n = 105), showed that even in relapsed and refractory disease median survival was 27 months with a considerable proportion of long-term survivors (~20%). CONCLUSION & PERSPECTIVE: With the expected emergence of additional active anti-myeloma compounds, we aim to assess survival in patients with relapsed and refractory MM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4777410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47774102016-03-10 Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics Willenbacher, Ella Weger, Roman Rochau, Ursula Siebert, Uwe Willenbacher, Wolfgang PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials demonstrate improving survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after treatment. However, it is unclear whether increased survival translates to a similar benefit in a real world setting. METHODS: We analyzed the overall survival of 347 multiple myeloma patients in Austria by means of a national registry (AMR), focused on results from 3(rd) and later lines of therapy. This benchmark was chosen to define a baseline prior to the broad application of upcoming 2(nd) generation drugs (carfilzomib, pomalidomide). RESULTS: Projected 10 years survival for patients with MM in Austria is estimated to be 56% in patients diagnosed in between the years 2011–2014, 21% in patients with a diagnosis made between 2000–2005, and 39% in those with a diagnosis made between 2006–2010). For the same intervals a significant increase in the use of both bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide—so called IMiDs (from 2005 onwards) and their simultaneous use in combination therapies (from 2010 onwards) could be shown. The use of autologous transplantation (ASCT) remained more or less constant at ~ 35% of patients in the 1(st) line setting over the whole period, comparing well to international practice patterns, while the use of 2(nd) line ASCT increased from 5.5% to 18.7% of patients. Patients in 3(rd) or later line treatment (n = 105), showed that even in relapsed and refractory disease median survival was 27 months with a considerable proportion of long-term survivors (~20%). CONCLUSION & PERSPECTIVE: With the expected emergence of additional active anti-myeloma compounds, we aim to assess survival in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Public Library of Science 2016-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4777410/ /pubmed/26937956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147381 Text en © 2016 Willenbacher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Willenbacher, Ella
Weger, Roman
Rochau, Ursula
Siebert, Uwe
Willenbacher, Wolfgang
Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics
title Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics
title_full Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics
title_fullStr Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics
title_short Real-World Use of 3rd Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Austria: An Austrian Myeloma Registry (AMR) Analysis of the Therapeutic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes prior to the Use of Next Generation Myeloma Therapeutics
title_sort real-world use of 3rd line therapy for multiple myeloma in austria: an austrian myeloma registry (amr) analysis of the therapeutic landscape and clinical outcomes prior to the use of next generation myeloma therapeutics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4777410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147381
work_keys_str_mv AT willenbacherella realworlduseof3rdlinetherapyformultiplemyelomainaustriaanaustrianmyelomaregistryamranalysisofthetherapeuticlandscapeandclinicaloutcomespriortotheuseofnextgenerationmyelomatherapeutics
AT wegerroman realworlduseof3rdlinetherapyformultiplemyelomainaustriaanaustrianmyelomaregistryamranalysisofthetherapeuticlandscapeandclinicaloutcomespriortotheuseofnextgenerationmyelomatherapeutics
AT rochauursula realworlduseof3rdlinetherapyformultiplemyelomainaustriaanaustrianmyelomaregistryamranalysisofthetherapeuticlandscapeandclinicaloutcomespriortotheuseofnextgenerationmyelomatherapeutics
AT siebertuwe realworlduseof3rdlinetherapyformultiplemyelomainaustriaanaustrianmyelomaregistryamranalysisofthetherapeuticlandscapeandclinicaloutcomespriortotheuseofnextgenerationmyelomatherapeutics
AT willenbacherwolfgang realworlduseof3rdlinetherapyformultiplemyelomainaustriaanaustrianmyelomaregistryamranalysisofthetherapeuticlandscapeandclinicaloutcomespriortotheuseofnextgenerationmyelomatherapeutics
AT realworlduseof3rdlinetherapyformultiplemyelomainaustriaanaustrianmyelomaregistryamranalysisofthetherapeuticlandscapeandclinicaloutcomespriortotheuseofnextgenerationmyelomatherapeutics