Cargando…
New drug approvals in acute myeloid leukemia: what’s the best end point?
Autores principales: | Estey, E, Othus, M, Lee, S J, Appelbaum, F R, Gale, R P |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4777773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.262 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Prediction of CR following a second course of ‘7+3' in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia not in CR after a first course
por: Othus, M, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Comparison between measurable residual disease relapse and morphologic relapse in acute myeloid leukemia and high-grade myeloid neoplasms
por: Shih, Lauren, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies
por: Othus, Megan, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Improved outcomes with “7+3” induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia over the past four decades: analysis of SWOG trial data
por: Othus, Megan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Effect of Measurable (“Minimal”) Residual Disease (MRD) Information on Prediction of Relapse and Survival in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia
por: Othus, Megan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)