Cargando…

ESGAR consensus statement on liver MR imaging and clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents

OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus and provide updated recommendations on liver MR imaging and the clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents. METHODS: The European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) formed a multinational European panel of experts, selected on the basis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neri, E., Bali, M. A., Ba-Ssalamah, A., Boraschi, P., Brancatelli, G., Alves, F. Caseiro, Grazioli, L., Helmberger, T., Lee, J. M., Manfredi, R., Martì-Bonmatì, L., Matos, C., Merkle, E. M., Op De Beeck, B., Schima, W., Skehan, S., Vilgrain, V., Zech, C., Bartolozzi, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3900-3
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus and provide updated recommendations on liver MR imaging and the clinical use of liver-specific contrast agents. METHODS: The European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) formed a multinational European panel of experts, selected on the basis of a literature review and their leadership in the field of liver MR imaging. A modified Delphi process was adopted to draft a list of statements. Descriptive and Cronbach’s statistics were used to rate levels of agreement and internal reliability of the consensus. RESULTS: Three Delphi rounds were conducted and 76 statements composed on MR technique (n = 17), clinical application of liver-specific contrast agents in benign, focal liver lesions (n = 7), malignant liver lesions in non-cirrhotic (n = 9) and in cirrhotic patients (n = 18), diffuse and vascular liver diseases (n = 12), and bile ducts (n = 13). The overall mean score of agreement was 4.84 (SD ±0.17). Full consensus was reached in 22 % of all statements in all working groups, with no full consensus reached on diffuse and vascular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus provided updated recommendations on the methodology, and clinical indications, of MRI with liver specific contrast agents in the study of liver diseases. KEY POINTS: • Liver-specific contrast agents are recommended in MRI of the liver. • The hepatobiliary phase improves the detection and characterization of hepatocellular lesions. • Liver-specific contrast agents can improve the detection of HCC.