Cargando…
Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer
OBJECTIVE: To compare sensitivity and specificity of endovaginal versus external-array coil T2-W and T2-W + DWI for detecting and staging small cervical tumours. METHODS: Optimised endovaginal and external array coil MRI at 3.0-T was done prospectively in 48 consecutive patients with stage Ia/Ib1 ce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26162579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3899-5 |
_version_ | 1782419411679838208 |
---|---|
author | Downey, Kate Attygalle, Ayoma D. Morgan, Veronica A. Giles, Sharon L. MacDonald, A. Davis, M. Ind, Thomas E. J. Shepherd, John H. deSouza, Nandita M. |
author_facet | Downey, Kate Attygalle, Ayoma D. Morgan, Veronica A. Giles, Sharon L. MacDonald, A. Davis, M. Ind, Thomas E. J. Shepherd, John H. deSouza, Nandita M. |
author_sort | Downey, Kate |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare sensitivity and specificity of endovaginal versus external-array coil T2-W and T2-W + DWI for detecting and staging small cervical tumours. METHODS: Optimised endovaginal and external array coil MRI at 3.0-T was done prospectively in 48 consecutive patients with stage Ia/Ib1 cervical cancer. Sensitivity/specificity for detecting tumour and parametrial extension against histopathology for a reading radiologist were determined on coronal T2-W and T2W + DW images. An independent radiologist also scored T2-W images without and with addition of DWI for the external-array and endovaginal coils on separate occasions >2 weeks apart. Cohen’s kappa assessed inter- and intra-observer agreement. RESULTS: Median tumour volume in 19/38 cases positive on subsequent histology was 1.75 cm(3). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV were: reading radiologist 91.3 %, 89.5 %, 91.3 %, 89.5 %, respectively; independent radiologist T2-W 82.6 %, 73.7 %, 79.1 %, 77.8 % for endovaginal, 73.9 %, 89.5 %, 89.5 %, 73.9 % for external-array coil. Adding DWI improved sensitivity and specificity of endovaginal imaging (78.2 %, 89.5 %); adding DWI to external-array imaging improved specificity (94.7 %) but reduced sensitivity (66.7 %). Inter- and intra-observer agreement on T2-W + DWI was good (kappa = 0.67 and 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endovaginal coil T2-W MRI is more sensitive than external-array coil for detecting tumours <2 cm(3); adding DWI improves specificity of endovaginal imaging but reduces sensitivity of external-array imaging. KEY POINTS: • Endovaginal more accurate than external-array T2-W MRI for detecting small cervical cancers. • Addition of DWI improves sensitivity and specificity of endovaginal T2-W imaging. • Addition of DWI substantially reduces sensitivity of external-array T2-W imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4778155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47781552016-03-22 Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer Downey, Kate Attygalle, Ayoma D. Morgan, Veronica A. Giles, Sharon L. MacDonald, A. Davis, M. Ind, Thomas E. J. Shepherd, John H. deSouza, Nandita M. Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVE: To compare sensitivity and specificity of endovaginal versus external-array coil T2-W and T2-W + DWI for detecting and staging small cervical tumours. METHODS: Optimised endovaginal and external array coil MRI at 3.0-T was done prospectively in 48 consecutive patients with stage Ia/Ib1 cervical cancer. Sensitivity/specificity for detecting tumour and parametrial extension against histopathology for a reading radiologist were determined on coronal T2-W and T2W + DW images. An independent radiologist also scored T2-W images without and with addition of DWI for the external-array and endovaginal coils on separate occasions >2 weeks apart. Cohen’s kappa assessed inter- and intra-observer agreement. RESULTS: Median tumour volume in 19/38 cases positive on subsequent histology was 1.75 cm(3). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV were: reading radiologist 91.3 %, 89.5 %, 91.3 %, 89.5 %, respectively; independent radiologist T2-W 82.6 %, 73.7 %, 79.1 %, 77.8 % for endovaginal, 73.9 %, 89.5 %, 89.5 %, 73.9 % for external-array coil. Adding DWI improved sensitivity and specificity of endovaginal imaging (78.2 %, 89.5 %); adding DWI to external-array imaging improved specificity (94.7 %) but reduced sensitivity (66.7 %). Inter- and intra-observer agreement on T2-W + DWI was good (kappa = 0.67 and 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endovaginal coil T2-W MRI is more sensitive than external-array coil for detecting tumours <2 cm(3); adding DWI improves specificity of endovaginal imaging but reduces sensitivity of external-array imaging. KEY POINTS: • Endovaginal more accurate than external-array T2-W MRI for detecting small cervical cancers. • Addition of DWI improves sensitivity and specificity of endovaginal T2-W imaging. • Addition of DWI substantially reduces sensitivity of external-array T2-W imaging. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4778155/ /pubmed/26162579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3899-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Magnetic Resonance Downey, Kate Attygalle, Ayoma D. Morgan, Veronica A. Giles, Sharon L. MacDonald, A. Davis, M. Ind, Thomas E. J. Shepherd, John H. deSouza, Nandita M. Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer |
title | Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer |
title_full | Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer |
title_short | Comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (IA/IB1) uterine cervical cancer |
title_sort | comparison of optimised endovaginal vs external array coil t2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for detecting suspected early stage (ia/ib1) uterine cervical cancer |
topic | Magnetic Resonance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26162579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3899-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT downeykate comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer AT attygalleayomad comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer AT morganveronicaa comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer AT gilessharonl comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer AT macdonalda comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer AT davism comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer AT indthomasej comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer AT shepherdjohnh comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer AT desouzananditam comparisonofoptimisedendovaginalvsexternalarraycoilt2weightedanddiffusionweightedimagingtechniquesfordetectingsuspectedearlystageiaib1uterinecervicalcancer |