Cargando…
Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers
BACKGROUND: Marking pencils which are frequently used in orthodontics may cause microbial contamination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three disinfection and sterilization methods (autoclave, glutaraldehyde solution, and Deconex spray) on orthodontic mark...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998472 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.176653 |
_version_ | 1782419414314909696 |
---|---|
author | Omidkhoda, Maryam Rashed, Roozbeh Bagheri, Zahra Ghazvini, Kiarash Shafaee, Hooman |
author_facet | Omidkhoda, Maryam Rashed, Roozbeh Bagheri, Zahra Ghazvini, Kiarash Shafaee, Hooman |
author_sort | Omidkhoda, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Marking pencils which are frequently used in orthodontics may cause microbial contamination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three disinfection and sterilization methods (autoclave, glutaraldehyde solution, and Deconex spray) on orthodontic markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty orthodontic markers were divided into four groups each 30 pencils: One control group and three groups for three different disinfection/sterilization methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of these methods, pencils were initially contaminated by common pathogen by immersing the pencils in a suspension containing 1.5 × 10(8) CFU/ml organisms. Then, the pencils were subjected to corresponding disinfection/sterilization methods, and the number of remaining microorganisms was calculated and compared with control group. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean number of Escherichia coli was significantly higher than the other two microorganisms (P = 0.01, P = 0.031). However, the mean numbers of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans were not significantly different (P = 0.1). After sterilization with autoclave and glutaraldehyde, no microbial growth was observed, whereas after disinfection with Deconx spray some colonies of microorganisms still could be observed. CONCLUSION: Autoclaving and glutaraldehyde solution are the best methods for disinfecting orthodontic markers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4778172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47781722016-03-18 Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers Omidkhoda, Maryam Rashed, Roozbeh Bagheri, Zahra Ghazvini, Kiarash Shafaee, Hooman J Orthod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Marking pencils which are frequently used in orthodontics may cause microbial contamination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three disinfection and sterilization methods (autoclave, glutaraldehyde solution, and Deconex spray) on orthodontic markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty orthodontic markers were divided into four groups each 30 pencils: One control group and three groups for three different disinfection/sterilization methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of these methods, pencils were initially contaminated by common pathogen by immersing the pencils in a suspension containing 1.5 × 10(8) CFU/ml organisms. Then, the pencils were subjected to corresponding disinfection/sterilization methods, and the number of remaining microorganisms was calculated and compared with control group. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean number of Escherichia coli was significantly higher than the other two microorganisms (P = 0.01, P = 0.031). However, the mean numbers of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans were not significantly different (P = 0.1). After sterilization with autoclave and glutaraldehyde, no microbial growth was observed, whereas after disinfection with Deconx spray some colonies of microorganisms still could be observed. CONCLUSION: Autoclaving and glutaraldehyde solution are the best methods for disinfecting orthodontic markers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4778172/ /pubmed/26998472 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.176653 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Omidkhoda, Maryam Rashed, Roozbeh Bagheri, Zahra Ghazvini, Kiarash Shafaee, Hooman Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers |
title | Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers |
title_full | Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers |
title_short | Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers |
title_sort | comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998472 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.176653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT omidkhodamaryam comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers AT rashedroozbeh comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers AT bagherizahra comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers AT ghazvinikiarash comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers AT shafaeehooman comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers |