Cargando…

Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers

BACKGROUND: Marking pencils which are frequently used in orthodontics may cause microbial contamination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three disinfection and sterilization methods (autoclave, glutaraldehyde solution, and Deconex spray) on orthodontic mark...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Omidkhoda, Maryam, Rashed, Roozbeh, Bagheri, Zahra, Ghazvini, Kiarash, Shafaee, Hooman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998472
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.176653
_version_ 1782419414314909696
author Omidkhoda, Maryam
Rashed, Roozbeh
Bagheri, Zahra
Ghazvini, Kiarash
Shafaee, Hooman
author_facet Omidkhoda, Maryam
Rashed, Roozbeh
Bagheri, Zahra
Ghazvini, Kiarash
Shafaee, Hooman
author_sort Omidkhoda, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Marking pencils which are frequently used in orthodontics may cause microbial contamination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three disinfection and sterilization methods (autoclave, glutaraldehyde solution, and Deconex spray) on orthodontic markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty orthodontic markers were divided into four groups each 30 pencils: One control group and three groups for three different disinfection/sterilization methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of these methods, pencils were initially contaminated by common pathogen by immersing the pencils in a suspension containing 1.5 × 10(8) CFU/ml organisms. Then, the pencils were subjected to corresponding disinfection/sterilization methods, and the number of remaining microorganisms was calculated and compared with control group. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean number of Escherichia coli was significantly higher than the other two microorganisms (P = 0.01, P = 0.031). However, the mean numbers of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans were not significantly different (P = 0.1). After sterilization with autoclave and glutaraldehyde, no microbial growth was observed, whereas after disinfection with Deconx spray some colonies of microorganisms still could be observed. CONCLUSION: Autoclaving and glutaraldehyde solution are the best methods for disinfecting orthodontic markers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4778172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47781722016-03-18 Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers Omidkhoda, Maryam Rashed, Roozbeh Bagheri, Zahra Ghazvini, Kiarash Shafaee, Hooman J Orthod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Marking pencils which are frequently used in orthodontics may cause microbial contamination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three disinfection and sterilization methods (autoclave, glutaraldehyde solution, and Deconex spray) on orthodontic markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty orthodontic markers were divided into four groups each 30 pencils: One control group and three groups for three different disinfection/sterilization methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of these methods, pencils were initially contaminated by common pathogen by immersing the pencils in a suspension containing 1.5 × 10(8) CFU/ml organisms. Then, the pencils were subjected to corresponding disinfection/sterilization methods, and the number of remaining microorganisms was calculated and compared with control group. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean number of Escherichia coli was significantly higher than the other two microorganisms (P = 0.01, P = 0.031). However, the mean numbers of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans were not significantly different (P = 0.1). After sterilization with autoclave and glutaraldehyde, no microbial growth was observed, whereas after disinfection with Deconx spray some colonies of microorganisms still could be observed. CONCLUSION: Autoclaving and glutaraldehyde solution are the best methods for disinfecting orthodontic markers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4778172/ /pubmed/26998472 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.176653 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Omidkhoda, Maryam
Rashed, Roozbeh
Bagheri, Zahra
Ghazvini, Kiarash
Shafaee, Hooman
Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers
title Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers
title_full Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers
title_fullStr Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers
title_short Comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers
title_sort comparison of three different sterilization and disinfection methods on orthodontic markers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998472
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0203.176653
work_keys_str_mv AT omidkhodamaryam comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers
AT rashedroozbeh comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers
AT bagherizahra comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers
AT ghazvinikiarash comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers
AT shafaeehooman comparisonofthreedifferentsterilizationanddisinfectionmethodsonorthodonticmarkers