Cargando…

Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba

Of the so-called nonpathogenic intestinal protozoa, Endolimax nana belongs to the ones least well described. Most data on E. nana have emerged from general surveys of intestinal parasites in selected cohorts and mostly in the absence of any particular focus on Endolimax. Hence, the genus of Endolima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poulsen, Casper Sahl, Stensvold, Christen Rune
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998431
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.175077
_version_ 1782419417833930752
author Poulsen, Casper Sahl
Stensvold, Christen Rune
author_facet Poulsen, Casper Sahl
Stensvold, Christen Rune
author_sort Poulsen, Casper Sahl
collection PubMed
description Of the so-called nonpathogenic intestinal protozoa, Endolimax nana belongs to the ones least well described. Most data on E. nana have emerged from general surveys of intestinal parasites in selected cohorts and mostly in the absence of any particular focus on Endolimax. Hence, the genus of Endolimax remains largely unexplored in terms of morphology, taxonomy, genetic diversity, host specificity, and epidemiology. In this review, we seek to provide an overview of the work that has been performed on the parasite since the genus Endolimax was described by Kuenen and Swellengrebel in 1917 and suggest activities that may pave the way for a better understanding of E. nana in a clinical and public health context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4778187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47781872016-03-18 Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba Poulsen, Casper Sahl Stensvold, Christen Rune Trop Parasitol Review Article Of the so-called nonpathogenic intestinal protozoa, Endolimax nana belongs to the ones least well described. Most data on E. nana have emerged from general surveys of intestinal parasites in selected cohorts and mostly in the absence of any particular focus on Endolimax. Hence, the genus of Endolimax remains largely unexplored in terms of morphology, taxonomy, genetic diversity, host specificity, and epidemiology. In this review, we seek to provide an overview of the work that has been performed on the parasite since the genus Endolimax was described by Kuenen and Swellengrebel in 1917 and suggest activities that may pave the way for a better understanding of E. nana in a clinical and public health context. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4778187/ /pubmed/26998431 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.175077 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Tropical Parasitology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Poulsen, Casper Sahl
Stensvold, Christen Rune
Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba
title Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba
title_full Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba
title_fullStr Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba
title_short Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba
title_sort systematic review on endolimax nana: a less well studied intestinal ameba
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998431
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.175077
work_keys_str_mv AT poulsencaspersahl systematicreviewonendolimaxnanaalesswellstudiedintestinalameba
AT stensvoldchristenrune systematicreviewonendolimaxnanaalesswellstudiedintestinalameba