Cargando…
A transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation
BACKGROUND: This study is a systematic evaluation of a novel tobacco product, electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) using a two-site, four-arm, 6-month, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a follow-up to 9 months. Virginia Commonwealth University is the primary site and Penn State Universi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2792-8 |
_version_ | 1782419437451739136 |
---|---|
author | Lopez, Alexa A. Cobb, Caroline O. Yingst, Jessica M. Veldheer, Susan Hrabovsky, Shari Yen, Miao-Shan Foulds, Jonathan Eissenberg, Thomas |
author_facet | Lopez, Alexa A. Cobb, Caroline O. Yingst, Jessica M. Veldheer, Susan Hrabovsky, Shari Yen, Miao-Shan Foulds, Jonathan Eissenberg, Thomas |
author_sort | Lopez, Alexa A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study is a systematic evaluation of a novel tobacco product, electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) using a two-site, four-arm, 6-month, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a follow-up to 9 months. Virginia Commonwealth University is the primary site and Penn State University is the secondary site. This RCT design is important because it is informed by analytical work, clinical laboratory results, and qualitative/quantitative findings regarding the specific ECIG products used. METHODS: Participants (N = 520) will be randomized across sites and must be healthy smokers of >9 cigarettes for at least one year, who have not had a quit attempt in the prior month, are not planning to quit in the next 6 months, and are interested in reducing cigarette intake. Participants will be randomized into one of four 24-week conditions: a cigarette substitute that does not produce an inhalable aerosol; or one of three ECIG conditions that differ by nicotine concentration 0, 8, or 36 mg/ml. Blocked randomization will be accomplished with a 1:1:1:1 ratio of condition assignments at each site. Specific aims are to: characterize ECIG influence on toxicants, biomarkers, health indicators, and disease risk; determine tobacco abstinence symptom and adverse event profile associated with real-world ECIG use; and examine the influence of ECIG use on conventional tobacco product use. Liquid nicotine concentration-related differences on these study outcomes are predicted. Participants and research staff in contact with participants will be blinded to the nicotine concentration in the ECIG conditions. DISCUSSION: Results from this study will inform knowledge concerning ECIG use as well as demonstrate a model that may be applied to other novel tobacco products. The model of using prior empirical testing of ECIG devices should be considered in other RCT evaluations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TRN: NCT02342795, registered December 16, 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4778292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47782922016-03-05 A transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation Lopez, Alexa A. Cobb, Caroline O. Yingst, Jessica M. Veldheer, Susan Hrabovsky, Shari Yen, Miao-Shan Foulds, Jonathan Eissenberg, Thomas BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: This study is a systematic evaluation of a novel tobacco product, electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) using a two-site, four-arm, 6-month, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a follow-up to 9 months. Virginia Commonwealth University is the primary site and Penn State University is the secondary site. This RCT design is important because it is informed by analytical work, clinical laboratory results, and qualitative/quantitative findings regarding the specific ECIG products used. METHODS: Participants (N = 520) will be randomized across sites and must be healthy smokers of >9 cigarettes for at least one year, who have not had a quit attempt in the prior month, are not planning to quit in the next 6 months, and are interested in reducing cigarette intake. Participants will be randomized into one of four 24-week conditions: a cigarette substitute that does not produce an inhalable aerosol; or one of three ECIG conditions that differ by nicotine concentration 0, 8, or 36 mg/ml. Blocked randomization will be accomplished with a 1:1:1:1 ratio of condition assignments at each site. Specific aims are to: characterize ECIG influence on toxicants, biomarkers, health indicators, and disease risk; determine tobacco abstinence symptom and adverse event profile associated with real-world ECIG use; and examine the influence of ECIG use on conventional tobacco product use. Liquid nicotine concentration-related differences on these study outcomes are predicted. Participants and research staff in contact with participants will be blinded to the nicotine concentration in the ECIG conditions. DISCUSSION: Results from this study will inform knowledge concerning ECIG use as well as demonstrate a model that may be applied to other novel tobacco products. The model of using prior empirical testing of ECIG devices should be considered in other RCT evaluations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TRN: NCT02342795, registered December 16, 2014. BioMed Central 2016-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4778292/ /pubmed/26941050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2792-8 Text en © Lopez et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lopez, Alexa A. Cobb, Caroline O. Yingst, Jessica M. Veldheer, Susan Hrabovsky, Shari Yen, Miao-Shan Foulds, Jonathan Eissenberg, Thomas A transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation |
title | A transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation |
title_full | A transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation |
title_fullStr | A transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | A transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation |
title_short | A transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation |
title_sort | transdisciplinary model to inform randomized clinical trial methods for electronic cigarette evaluation |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2792-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezalexaa atransdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT cobbcarolineo atransdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT yingstjessicam atransdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT veldheersusan atransdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT hrabovskyshari atransdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT yenmiaoshan atransdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT fouldsjonathan atransdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT eissenbergthomas atransdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT lopezalexaa transdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT cobbcarolineo transdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT yingstjessicam transdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT veldheersusan transdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT hrabovskyshari transdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT yenmiaoshan transdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT fouldsjonathan transdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation AT eissenbergthomas transdisciplinarymodeltoinformrandomizedclinicaltrialmethodsforelectroniccigaretteevaluation |