Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies

Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siler, Thomas M., Kerwin, Edward, Singletary, Karen, Brooks, Jean, Church, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2015.1034256
_version_ 1782419485502734336
author Siler, Thomas M.
Kerwin, Edward
Singletary, Karen
Brooks, Jean
Church, Alison
author_facet Siler, Thomas M.
Kerwin, Edward
Singletary, Karen
Brooks, Jean
Church, Alison
author_sort Siler, Thomas M.
collection PubMed
description Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62.5 μg and 125 μg) 
or placebo (PBO), added to twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL; 250/50 μg). In both studies, the primary efficacy measure was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) at Day 85. Secondary endpoints were weighted-mean (WM) FEV(1) over 0–6 hours post-dose (Day 84) and rescue albuterol use. Health-related quality of life outcomes (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD assessment test [CAT]) were also examined. Safety was assessed throughout. Both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically significant improvements in trough FEV(1) (Day 85: 0.127–0.148 L) versus PBO+FP/SAL. Similarly, both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically-significant improvements in 0–6 hours post-dose WM FEV(1) versus PBO+FP/SAL (Day 84: 0.144–0.165 L). Rescue use over Weeks 1–12 decreased with UMEC+FP/SAL in both studies versus PBO+FP/SAL (Study 1, 0.3 puffs/day [both doses]; Study 2, 0.5 puffs/day [UMEC 125+FP/SAL]). Decreases from baseline in CAT score were generally larger for both doses of UMEC+FP/SAL versus PBO+FP/SAL (except for Day 84 Study 2). In Study 1, no differences in SGRQ score were observed between UMEC+FP/SAL and PBO+FP/SAL; however, in Study 2, statistically significant improvements were observed with UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL (Day 28) and UMEC 125+FP/SAL (Days 28 and 84) versus PBO+FP/SAL. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events across all treatment groups was 37–41% in Study 1 and 36–38% in Study 2. Overall, these data indicate that the combination of UMEC+FP/SAL can provide additional benefits over FP/SAL alone in patients with COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4778542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47785422016-03-21 Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies Siler, Thomas M. Kerwin, Edward Singletary, Karen Brooks, Jean Church, Alison COPD Original Research Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62.5 μg and 125 μg) 
or placebo (PBO), added to twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL; 250/50 μg). In both studies, the primary efficacy measure was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) at Day 85. Secondary endpoints were weighted-mean (WM) FEV(1) over 0–6 hours post-dose (Day 84) and rescue albuterol use. Health-related quality of life outcomes (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD assessment test [CAT]) were also examined. Safety was assessed throughout. Both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically significant improvements in trough FEV(1) (Day 85: 0.127–0.148 L) versus PBO+FP/SAL. Similarly, both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically-significant improvements in 0–6 hours post-dose WM FEV(1) versus PBO+FP/SAL (Day 84: 0.144–0.165 L). Rescue use over Weeks 1–12 decreased with UMEC+FP/SAL in both studies versus PBO+FP/SAL (Study 1, 0.3 puffs/day [both doses]; Study 2, 0.5 puffs/day [UMEC 125+FP/SAL]). Decreases from baseline in CAT score were generally larger for both doses of UMEC+FP/SAL versus PBO+FP/SAL (except for Day 84 Study 2). In Study 1, no differences in SGRQ score were observed between UMEC+FP/SAL and PBO+FP/SAL; however, in Study 2, statistically significant improvements were observed with UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL (Day 28) and UMEC 125+FP/SAL (Days 28 and 84) versus PBO+FP/SAL. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events across all treatment groups was 37–41% in Study 1 and 36–38% in Study 2. Overall, these data indicate that the combination of UMEC+FP/SAL can provide additional benefits over FP/SAL alone in patients with COPD. Informa Healthcare 2016-01-02 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4778542/ /pubmed/26451734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2015.1034256 Text en © T.M. Siler, E. Kerwin, K. Singletary, J. Brooks, A. Church. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Original Research
Siler, Thomas M.
Kerwin, Edward
Singletary, Karen
Brooks, Jean
Church, Alison
Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies
title Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies
title_sort efficacy and safety of umeclidinium added to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with copd: results of two randomized, double-blind studies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2015.1034256
work_keys_str_mv AT silerthomasm efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies
AT kerwinedward efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies
AT singletarykaren efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies
AT brooksjean efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies
AT churchalison efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies