Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies
Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2015.1034256 |
_version_ | 1782419485502734336 |
---|---|
author | Siler, Thomas M. Kerwin, Edward Singletary, Karen Brooks, Jean Church, Alison |
author_facet | Siler, Thomas M. Kerwin, Edward Singletary, Karen Brooks, Jean Church, Alison |
author_sort | Siler, Thomas M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62.5 μg and 125 μg)
or placebo (PBO), added to twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL; 250/50 μg). In both studies, the primary efficacy measure was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) at Day 85. Secondary endpoints were weighted-mean (WM) FEV(1) over 0–6 hours post-dose (Day 84) and rescue albuterol use. Health-related quality of life outcomes (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD assessment test [CAT]) were also examined. Safety was assessed throughout. Both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically significant improvements in trough FEV(1) (Day 85: 0.127–0.148 L) versus PBO+FP/SAL. Similarly, both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically-significant improvements in 0–6 hours post-dose WM FEV(1) versus PBO+FP/SAL (Day 84: 0.144–0.165 L). Rescue use over Weeks 1–12 decreased with UMEC+FP/SAL in both studies versus PBO+FP/SAL (Study 1, 0.3 puffs/day [both doses]; Study 2, 0.5 puffs/day [UMEC 125+FP/SAL]). Decreases from baseline in CAT score were generally larger for both doses of UMEC+FP/SAL versus PBO+FP/SAL (except for Day 84 Study 2). In Study 1, no differences in SGRQ score were observed between UMEC+FP/SAL and PBO+FP/SAL; however, in Study 2, statistically significant improvements were observed with UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL (Day 28) and UMEC 125+FP/SAL (Days 28 and 84) versus PBO+FP/SAL. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events across all treatment groups was 37–41% in Study 1 and 36–38% in Study 2. Overall, these data indicate that the combination of UMEC+FP/SAL can provide additional benefits over FP/SAL alone in patients with COPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4778542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47785422016-03-21 Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies Siler, Thomas M. Kerwin, Edward Singletary, Karen Brooks, Jean Church, Alison COPD Original Research Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62.5 μg and 125 μg)
or placebo (PBO), added to twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL; 250/50 μg). In both studies, the primary efficacy measure was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) at Day 85. Secondary endpoints were weighted-mean (WM) FEV(1) over 0–6 hours post-dose (Day 84) and rescue albuterol use. Health-related quality of life outcomes (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD assessment test [CAT]) were also examined. Safety was assessed throughout. Both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically significant improvements in trough FEV(1) (Day 85: 0.127–0.148 L) versus PBO+FP/SAL. Similarly, both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically-significant improvements in 0–6 hours post-dose WM FEV(1) versus PBO+FP/SAL (Day 84: 0.144–0.165 L). Rescue use over Weeks 1–12 decreased with UMEC+FP/SAL in both studies versus PBO+FP/SAL (Study 1, 0.3 puffs/day [both doses]; Study 2, 0.5 puffs/day [UMEC 125+FP/SAL]). Decreases from baseline in CAT score were generally larger for both doses of UMEC+FP/SAL versus PBO+FP/SAL (except for Day 84 Study 2). In Study 1, no differences in SGRQ score were observed between UMEC+FP/SAL and PBO+FP/SAL; however, in Study 2, statistically significant improvements were observed with UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL (Day 28) and UMEC 125+FP/SAL (Days 28 and 84) versus PBO+FP/SAL. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events across all treatment groups was 37–41% in Study 1 and 36–38% in Study 2. Overall, these data indicate that the combination of UMEC+FP/SAL can provide additional benefits over FP/SAL alone in patients with COPD. Informa Healthcare 2016-01-02 2015-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4778542/ /pubmed/26451734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2015.1034256 Text en © T.M. Siler, E. Kerwin, K. Singletary, J. Brooks, A. Church. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Siler, Thomas M. Kerwin, Edward Singletary, Karen Brooks, Jean Church, Alison Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind Studies |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of umeclidinium added to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with copd: results of two randomized, double-blind studies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2015.1034256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silerthomasm efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies AT kerwinedward efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies AT singletarykaren efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies AT brooksjean efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies AT churchalison efficacyandsafetyofumeclidiniumaddedtofluticasonepropionatesalmeterolinpatientswithcopdresultsoftworandomizeddoubleblindstudies |