Cargando…

The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report

BACKGROUND: In vitro diagnostic (IVD) investigations are indispensable for routine patient management. Appropriate testing allows early-stage interventions, reducing late-stage healthcare expenditure (HCE). AIM: To investigate HCE on IVDs in two developed markets and to assess the perceived value of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rohr, Ulrich-Peter, Binder, Carmen, Dieterle, Thomas, Giusti, Francesco, Messina, Carlo Guiseppe Mario, Toerien, Eduard, Moch, Holger, Schäfer, Hans Hendrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149856
_version_ 1782419526042779648
author Rohr, Ulrich-Peter
Binder, Carmen
Dieterle, Thomas
Giusti, Francesco
Messina, Carlo Guiseppe Mario
Toerien, Eduard
Moch, Holger
Schäfer, Hans Hendrik
author_facet Rohr, Ulrich-Peter
Binder, Carmen
Dieterle, Thomas
Giusti, Francesco
Messina, Carlo Guiseppe Mario
Toerien, Eduard
Moch, Holger
Schäfer, Hans Hendrik
author_sort Rohr, Ulrich-Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In vitro diagnostic (IVD) investigations are indispensable for routine patient management. Appropriate testing allows early-stage interventions, reducing late-stage healthcare expenditure (HCE). AIM: To investigate HCE on IVDs in two developed markets and to assess the perceived value of IVDs on clinical decision-making. Physician-perceived HCE on IVD was evaluated, as well as desired features of new diagnostic markers. METHODS: Past and current HCE on IVD was calculated for the US and Germany. A total of 79 US/German oncologists and cardiologists were interviewed to assess the number of cases where: physicians ask for IVDs; IVDs are used for initial diagnosis, treatment monitoring, or post-treatment; and decision-making is based on an IVD test result. A sample of 201 US and German oncologists and cardiologists was questioned regarding the proportion of HCE they believed to be attributable to IVD testing. After disclosing the actual IVD HCE, the physician’s perception of the appropriateness of the amount was captured. Finally, the association between physician-rated impact of IVD on decision-making and perceived contribution of IVD expenditure on overall HCE was assessed. RESULTS: IVD costs account for 2.3% and 1.4% of total HCE in the US and Germany. Most physicians (81%) believed that the actual HCE on IVDs was >5%; 19% rated the spending correctly (0–4%, p<0.001). When informed of the actual amount, 64% of physicians rated this as appropriate (p<0.0001); 66% of decision-making was based on IVD. Significantly, more physicians asked for either additional clinical or combined clinical/health economic data than for the product (test/platform) alone (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a poor awareness of actual HCE on IVD, but a high attributable value of diagnostic procedures for patient management. New markers should deliver actionable and medically relevant information, to guide decision-making and foster improved patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4778800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47788002016-03-23 The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report Rohr, Ulrich-Peter Binder, Carmen Dieterle, Thomas Giusti, Francesco Messina, Carlo Guiseppe Mario Toerien, Eduard Moch, Holger Schäfer, Hans Hendrik PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In vitro diagnostic (IVD) investigations are indispensable for routine patient management. Appropriate testing allows early-stage interventions, reducing late-stage healthcare expenditure (HCE). AIM: To investigate HCE on IVDs in two developed markets and to assess the perceived value of IVDs on clinical decision-making. Physician-perceived HCE on IVD was evaluated, as well as desired features of new diagnostic markers. METHODS: Past and current HCE on IVD was calculated for the US and Germany. A total of 79 US/German oncologists and cardiologists were interviewed to assess the number of cases where: physicians ask for IVDs; IVDs are used for initial diagnosis, treatment monitoring, or post-treatment; and decision-making is based on an IVD test result. A sample of 201 US and German oncologists and cardiologists was questioned regarding the proportion of HCE they believed to be attributable to IVD testing. After disclosing the actual IVD HCE, the physician’s perception of the appropriateness of the amount was captured. Finally, the association between physician-rated impact of IVD on decision-making and perceived contribution of IVD expenditure on overall HCE was assessed. RESULTS: IVD costs account for 2.3% and 1.4% of total HCE in the US and Germany. Most physicians (81%) believed that the actual HCE on IVDs was >5%; 19% rated the spending correctly (0–4%, p<0.001). When informed of the actual amount, 64% of physicians rated this as appropriate (p<0.0001); 66% of decision-making was based on IVD. Significantly, more physicians asked for either additional clinical or combined clinical/health economic data than for the product (test/platform) alone (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a poor awareness of actual HCE on IVD, but a high attributable value of diagnostic procedures for patient management. New markers should deliver actionable and medically relevant information, to guide decision-making and foster improved patient outcomes. Public Library of Science 2016-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4778800/ /pubmed/26942417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149856 Text en © 2016 Rohr et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rohr, Ulrich-Peter
Binder, Carmen
Dieterle, Thomas
Giusti, Francesco
Messina, Carlo Guiseppe Mario
Toerien, Eduard
Moch, Holger
Schäfer, Hans Hendrik
The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report
title The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report
title_full The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report
title_fullStr The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report
title_full_unstemmed The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report
title_short The Value of In Vitro Diagnostic Testing in Medical Practice: A Status Report
title_sort value of in vitro diagnostic testing in medical practice: a status report
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149856
work_keys_str_mv AT rohrulrichpeter thevalueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT bindercarmen thevalueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT dieterlethomas thevalueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT giustifrancesco thevalueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT messinacarloguiseppemario thevalueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT toerieneduard thevalueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT mochholger thevalueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT schaferhanshendrik thevalueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT rohrulrichpeter valueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT bindercarmen valueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT dieterlethomas valueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT giustifrancesco valueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT messinacarloguiseppemario valueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT toerieneduard valueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT mochholger valueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport
AT schaferhanshendrik valueofinvitrodiagnostictestinginmedicalpracticeastatusreport