Cargando…

The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats

A fundamental condition for any work with free-ranging animals is correct species identification. However, in case of bats, information on local species assemblies is frequently limited especially in regions with high biodiversity such as the Neotropics. The bat genus Molossus is a typical example o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gager, Yann, Tarland, Emilia, Lieckfeldt, Dietmar, Ménage, Matthieu, Botero-Castro, Fidel, Rossiter, Stephen J., Kraus, Robert H. S., Ludwig, Arne, Dechmann, Dina K. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150780
_version_ 1782419561159589888
author Gager, Yann
Tarland, Emilia
Lieckfeldt, Dietmar
Ménage, Matthieu
Botero-Castro, Fidel
Rossiter, Stephen J.
Kraus, Robert H. S.
Ludwig, Arne
Dechmann, Dina K. N.
author_facet Gager, Yann
Tarland, Emilia
Lieckfeldt, Dietmar
Ménage, Matthieu
Botero-Castro, Fidel
Rossiter, Stephen J.
Kraus, Robert H. S.
Ludwig, Arne
Dechmann, Dina K. N.
author_sort Gager, Yann
collection PubMed
description A fundamental condition for any work with free-ranging animals is correct species identification. However, in case of bats, information on local species assemblies is frequently limited especially in regions with high biodiversity such as the Neotropics. The bat genus Molossus is a typical example of this, with morphologically similar species often occurring in sympatry. We used a multi-method approach based on molecular, morphometric and acoustic information collected from 962 individuals of Molossus bondae, M. coibensis, and M. molossus captured in Panama. We distinguished M. bondae based on size and pelage coloration. We identified two robust species clusters composed of M. molossus and M. coibensis based on 18 microsatellite markers but also on a more stringently determined set of four markers. Phylogenetic reconstructions using the mitochondrial gene co1 (DNA barcode) were used to diagnose these microsatellite clusters as M. molossus and M. coibensis. To differentiate species, morphological information was only reliable when forearm length and body mass were combined in a linear discriminant function (95.9% correctly identified individuals). When looking in more detail at M. molossus and M. coibensis, only four out of 13 wing parameters were informative for species differentiation, with M. coibensis showing lower values for hand wing area and hand wing length and higher values for wing loading. Acoustic recordings after release required categorization of calls into types, yielding only two informative subsets: approach calls and two-toned search calls. Our data emphasizes the importance of combining morphological traits and independent genetic data to inform the best choice and combination of discriminatory information used in the field. Because parameters can vary geographically, the multi-method approach may need to be adjusted to local species assemblies and populations to be entirely informative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4778951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47789512016-03-23 The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats Gager, Yann Tarland, Emilia Lieckfeldt, Dietmar Ménage, Matthieu Botero-Castro, Fidel Rossiter, Stephen J. Kraus, Robert H. S. Ludwig, Arne Dechmann, Dina K. N. PLoS One Research Article A fundamental condition for any work with free-ranging animals is correct species identification. However, in case of bats, information on local species assemblies is frequently limited especially in regions with high biodiversity such as the Neotropics. The bat genus Molossus is a typical example of this, with morphologically similar species often occurring in sympatry. We used a multi-method approach based on molecular, morphometric and acoustic information collected from 962 individuals of Molossus bondae, M. coibensis, and M. molossus captured in Panama. We distinguished M. bondae based on size and pelage coloration. We identified two robust species clusters composed of M. molossus and M. coibensis based on 18 microsatellite markers but also on a more stringently determined set of four markers. Phylogenetic reconstructions using the mitochondrial gene co1 (DNA barcode) were used to diagnose these microsatellite clusters as M. molossus and M. coibensis. To differentiate species, morphological information was only reliable when forearm length and body mass were combined in a linear discriminant function (95.9% correctly identified individuals). When looking in more detail at M. molossus and M. coibensis, only four out of 13 wing parameters were informative for species differentiation, with M. coibensis showing lower values for hand wing area and hand wing length and higher values for wing loading. Acoustic recordings after release required categorization of calls into types, yielding only two informative subsets: approach calls and two-toned search calls. Our data emphasizes the importance of combining morphological traits and independent genetic data to inform the best choice and combination of discriminatory information used in the field. Because parameters can vary geographically, the multi-method approach may need to be adjusted to local species assemblies and populations to be entirely informative. Public Library of Science 2016-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4778951/ /pubmed/26943355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150780 Text en © 2016 Gager et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gager, Yann
Tarland, Emilia
Lieckfeldt, Dietmar
Ménage, Matthieu
Botero-Castro, Fidel
Rossiter, Stephen J.
Kraus, Robert H. S.
Ludwig, Arne
Dechmann, Dina K. N.
The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats
title The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats
title_full The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats
title_fullStr The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats
title_short The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats
title_sort value of molecular vs. morphometric and acoustic information for species identification using sympatric molossid bats
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150780
work_keys_str_mv AT gageryann thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT tarlandemilia thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT lieckfeldtdietmar thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT menagematthieu thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT boterocastrofidel thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT rossiterstephenj thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT krausroberths thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT ludwigarne thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT dechmanndinakn thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT gageryann valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT tarlandemilia valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT lieckfeldtdietmar valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT menagematthieu valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT boterocastrofidel valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT rossiterstephenj valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT krausroberths valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT ludwigarne valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats
AT dechmanndinakn valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats