Cargando…
The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats
A fundamental condition for any work with free-ranging animals is correct species identification. However, in case of bats, information on local species assemblies is frequently limited especially in regions with high biodiversity such as the Neotropics. The bat genus Molossus is a typical example o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150780 |
_version_ | 1782419561159589888 |
---|---|
author | Gager, Yann Tarland, Emilia Lieckfeldt, Dietmar Ménage, Matthieu Botero-Castro, Fidel Rossiter, Stephen J. Kraus, Robert H. S. Ludwig, Arne Dechmann, Dina K. N. |
author_facet | Gager, Yann Tarland, Emilia Lieckfeldt, Dietmar Ménage, Matthieu Botero-Castro, Fidel Rossiter, Stephen J. Kraus, Robert H. S. Ludwig, Arne Dechmann, Dina K. N. |
author_sort | Gager, Yann |
collection | PubMed |
description | A fundamental condition for any work with free-ranging animals is correct species identification. However, in case of bats, information on local species assemblies is frequently limited especially in regions with high biodiversity such as the Neotropics. The bat genus Molossus is a typical example of this, with morphologically similar species often occurring in sympatry. We used a multi-method approach based on molecular, morphometric and acoustic information collected from 962 individuals of Molossus bondae, M. coibensis, and M. molossus captured in Panama. We distinguished M. bondae based on size and pelage coloration. We identified two robust species clusters composed of M. molossus and M. coibensis based on 18 microsatellite markers but also on a more stringently determined set of four markers. Phylogenetic reconstructions using the mitochondrial gene co1 (DNA barcode) were used to diagnose these microsatellite clusters as M. molossus and M. coibensis. To differentiate species, morphological information was only reliable when forearm length and body mass were combined in a linear discriminant function (95.9% correctly identified individuals). When looking in more detail at M. molossus and M. coibensis, only four out of 13 wing parameters were informative for species differentiation, with M. coibensis showing lower values for hand wing area and hand wing length and higher values for wing loading. Acoustic recordings after release required categorization of calls into types, yielding only two informative subsets: approach calls and two-toned search calls. Our data emphasizes the importance of combining morphological traits and independent genetic data to inform the best choice and combination of discriminatory information used in the field. Because parameters can vary geographically, the multi-method approach may need to be adjusted to local species assemblies and populations to be entirely informative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4778951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47789512016-03-23 The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats Gager, Yann Tarland, Emilia Lieckfeldt, Dietmar Ménage, Matthieu Botero-Castro, Fidel Rossiter, Stephen J. Kraus, Robert H. S. Ludwig, Arne Dechmann, Dina K. N. PLoS One Research Article A fundamental condition for any work with free-ranging animals is correct species identification. However, in case of bats, information on local species assemblies is frequently limited especially in regions with high biodiversity such as the Neotropics. The bat genus Molossus is a typical example of this, with morphologically similar species often occurring in sympatry. We used a multi-method approach based on molecular, morphometric and acoustic information collected from 962 individuals of Molossus bondae, M. coibensis, and M. molossus captured in Panama. We distinguished M. bondae based on size and pelage coloration. We identified two robust species clusters composed of M. molossus and M. coibensis based on 18 microsatellite markers but also on a more stringently determined set of four markers. Phylogenetic reconstructions using the mitochondrial gene co1 (DNA barcode) were used to diagnose these microsatellite clusters as M. molossus and M. coibensis. To differentiate species, morphological information was only reliable when forearm length and body mass were combined in a linear discriminant function (95.9% correctly identified individuals). When looking in more detail at M. molossus and M. coibensis, only four out of 13 wing parameters were informative for species differentiation, with M. coibensis showing lower values for hand wing area and hand wing length and higher values for wing loading. Acoustic recordings after release required categorization of calls into types, yielding only two informative subsets: approach calls and two-toned search calls. Our data emphasizes the importance of combining morphological traits and independent genetic data to inform the best choice and combination of discriminatory information used in the field. Because parameters can vary geographically, the multi-method approach may need to be adjusted to local species assemblies and populations to be entirely informative. Public Library of Science 2016-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4778951/ /pubmed/26943355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150780 Text en © 2016 Gager et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gager, Yann Tarland, Emilia Lieckfeldt, Dietmar Ménage, Matthieu Botero-Castro, Fidel Rossiter, Stephen J. Kraus, Robert H. S. Ludwig, Arne Dechmann, Dina K. N. The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats |
title | The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats |
title_full | The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats |
title_fullStr | The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats |
title_short | The Value of Molecular vs. Morphometric and Acoustic Information for Species Identification Using Sympatric Molossid Bats |
title_sort | value of molecular vs. morphometric and acoustic information for species identification using sympatric molossid bats |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26943355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gageryann thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT tarlandemilia thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT lieckfeldtdietmar thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT menagematthieu thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT boterocastrofidel thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT rossiterstephenj thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT krausroberths thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT ludwigarne thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT dechmanndinakn thevalueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT gageryann valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT tarlandemilia valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT lieckfeldtdietmar valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT menagematthieu valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT boterocastrofidel valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT rossiterstephenj valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT krausroberths valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT ludwigarne valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats AT dechmanndinakn valueofmolecularvsmorphometricandacousticinformationforspeciesidentificationusingsympatricmolossidbats |