Cargando…

Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study

Despite known limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), radiation treatment fields are generally based on PET-identified disease extent. However, no studies have examined the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT on a per-node basis in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinfort, Daniel P., Siva, Shankar, Leong, Tracy L., Rose, Morgan, Herath, Dishan, Antippa, Phillip, Ball, David L., Irving, Louis B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002488
_version_ 1782419564225626112
author Steinfort, Daniel P.
Siva, Shankar
Leong, Tracy L.
Rose, Morgan
Herath, Dishan
Antippa, Phillip
Ball, David L.
Irving, Louis B.
author_facet Steinfort, Daniel P.
Siva, Shankar
Leong, Tracy L.
Rose, Morgan
Herath, Dishan
Antippa, Phillip
Ball, David L.
Irving, Louis B.
author_sort Steinfort, Daniel P.
collection PubMed
description Despite known limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), radiation treatment fields are generally based on PET-identified disease extent. However, no studies have examined the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT on a per-node basis in patients being considered for curative-intent radiotherapy in NSCLC. In a prospective trial, patients with NSCLC being considered for definitive thoracic radiotherapy (± systemic chemotherapy) underwent minimally invasive systematic mediastinal evaluation with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) following noninvasive staging with integrated PET-CT. Thirty patients underwent EBUS-TBNA, with TBNA performed from a mean 2.5 lymph node (LN) stations per patient (median 3, range 1–5). Discordant findings between PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA were observed in 10 patients (33%, 95% CI 19%–51%). PET-occult LN metastases were demonstrated by EBUS in 4 patients, whereas a lesser extent of mediastinal involvement, compared with FDG-PET, was demonstrated by EBUS in 6 patients, including 2 patients downstaged from cN3 to pN2. LNs upstaged by EBUS were significantly smaller than nodes downstaged by EBUS, 7.5 mm (range 7–9) versus 12 mm (range 6–21), P = 0.005. A significant proportion of patients considered for definitive radiotherapy (+/-chemotherapy) undergoing systematic mediastinal evaluation with EBUS-TBNA in this study have an extent of mediastinal NSCLC involvement discordant with that indicated by PET-CT. Systematic EBUS-TBNA may aid in defining the extent of mediastinal involvement in NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy. Systematic EBUS-TBNA has the potential to contribute significantly to radiotherapy planning and delivery, by either identifying occult nodal metastases, or demonstrating FDG-avid LNs to be disease-free.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4778990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47789902016-03-24 Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study Steinfort, Daniel P. Siva, Shankar Leong, Tracy L. Rose, Morgan Herath, Dishan Antippa, Phillip Ball, David L. Irving, Louis B. Medicine (Baltimore) 6700 Despite known limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), radiation treatment fields are generally based on PET-identified disease extent. However, no studies have examined the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT on a per-node basis in patients being considered for curative-intent radiotherapy in NSCLC. In a prospective trial, patients with NSCLC being considered for definitive thoracic radiotherapy (± systemic chemotherapy) underwent minimally invasive systematic mediastinal evaluation with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) following noninvasive staging with integrated PET-CT. Thirty patients underwent EBUS-TBNA, with TBNA performed from a mean 2.5 lymph node (LN) stations per patient (median 3, range 1–5). Discordant findings between PET-CT and EBUS-TBNA were observed in 10 patients (33%, 95% CI 19%–51%). PET-occult LN metastases were demonstrated by EBUS in 4 patients, whereas a lesser extent of mediastinal involvement, compared with FDG-PET, was demonstrated by EBUS in 6 patients, including 2 patients downstaged from cN3 to pN2. LNs upstaged by EBUS were significantly smaller than nodes downstaged by EBUS, 7.5 mm (range 7–9) versus 12 mm (range 6–21), P = 0.005. A significant proportion of patients considered for definitive radiotherapy (+/-chemotherapy) undergoing systematic mediastinal evaluation with EBUS-TBNA in this study have an extent of mediastinal NSCLC involvement discordant with that indicated by PET-CT. Systematic EBUS-TBNA may aid in defining the extent of mediastinal involvement in NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy. Systematic EBUS-TBNA has the potential to contribute significantly to radiotherapy planning and delivery, by either identifying occult nodal metastases, or demonstrating FDG-avid LNs to be disease-free. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4778990/ /pubmed/26937894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002488 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 6700
Steinfort, Daniel P.
Siva, Shankar
Leong, Tracy L.
Rose, Morgan
Herath, Dishan
Antippa, Phillip
Ball, David L.
Irving, Louis B.
Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
title Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
title_full Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
title_short Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Staging Versus Positron Emission Tomography for Comprehensive Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Before Radical Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study
title_sort systematic endobronchial ultrasound-guided mediastinal staging versus positron emission tomography for comprehensive mediastinal staging in nsclc before radical radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study
topic 6700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002488
work_keys_str_mv AT steinfortdanielp systematicendobronchialultrasoundguidedmediastinalstagingversuspositronemissiontomographyforcomprehensivemediastinalstaginginnsclcbeforeradicalradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancerapilotstudy
AT sivashankar systematicendobronchialultrasoundguidedmediastinalstagingversuspositronemissiontomographyforcomprehensivemediastinalstaginginnsclcbeforeradicalradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancerapilotstudy
AT leongtracyl systematicendobronchialultrasoundguidedmediastinalstagingversuspositronemissiontomographyforcomprehensivemediastinalstaginginnsclcbeforeradicalradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancerapilotstudy
AT rosemorgan systematicendobronchialultrasoundguidedmediastinalstagingversuspositronemissiontomographyforcomprehensivemediastinalstaginginnsclcbeforeradicalradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancerapilotstudy
AT herathdishan systematicendobronchialultrasoundguidedmediastinalstagingversuspositronemissiontomographyforcomprehensivemediastinalstaginginnsclcbeforeradicalradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancerapilotstudy
AT antippaphillip systematicendobronchialultrasoundguidedmediastinalstagingversuspositronemissiontomographyforcomprehensivemediastinalstaginginnsclcbeforeradicalradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancerapilotstudy
AT balldavidl systematicendobronchialultrasoundguidedmediastinalstagingversuspositronemissiontomographyforcomprehensivemediastinalstaginginnsclcbeforeradicalradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancerapilotstudy
AT irvinglouisb systematicendobronchialultrasoundguidedmediastinalstagingversuspositronemissiontomographyforcomprehensivemediastinalstaginginnsclcbeforeradicalradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancerapilotstudy