Cargando…

For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time

BACKGROUND: This study is an assessment of the impact of acquisition times on SUV with [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT on healthy livers (reference organ with stable uptake over time) and on tumors. METHODS: One hundred six [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT were acquired in list mode over a single-bed position (livers (n = 48) o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sher, Avigaëlle, Lacoeuille, Franck, Fosse, Pacôme, Vervueren, Laurent, Cahouet-Vannier, Aurélie, Dabli, Djamel, Bouchet, Francis, Couturier, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26944734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0177-8
_version_ 1782419579364966400
author Sher, Avigaëlle
Lacoeuille, Franck
Fosse, Pacôme
Vervueren, Laurent
Cahouet-Vannier, Aurélie
Dabli, Djamel
Bouchet, Francis
Couturier, Olivier
author_facet Sher, Avigaëlle
Lacoeuille, Franck
Fosse, Pacôme
Vervueren, Laurent
Cahouet-Vannier, Aurélie
Dabli, Djamel
Bouchet, Francis
Couturier, Olivier
author_sort Sher, Avigaëlle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study is an assessment of the impact of acquisition times on SUV with [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT on healthy livers (reference organ with stable uptake over time) and on tumors. METHODS: One hundred six [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT were acquired in list mode over a single-bed position (livers (n = 48) or on tumors (n = 58)). Six independent datasets of different durations were reconstructed (from 1.5 to 10 min). SUV(max) (hottest voxel), SUV(peak) (maximum average SUV within a 1-cm(3) spherical volume), and SUV(average) were measured within a 3-cm-diameter volume of interest (VOI) in the right lobe of the liver. For [(18)F]FDG avid tumors (SUV(max) ≥ 5), the SUV(max), SUV(peak), and SUV(41%) (isocontour threshold method) were computed. RESULTS: For tumors, SUV(peak) values did not vary with acquisition time. SUV(max) displayed significant differences between 1.5- and 5–10-min reconstruction times. SUV(41%) was the most time-dependent parameter. For the liver, the SUV(average) was the sole parameter that did not vary over time. CONCLUSIONS: For [(18)F]FDG avid tumors, with short acquisition times, i.e., with new generations of PET systems, the SUV(peak) may be more robust than the SUV(max). The SUV(average) over a 3-cm-diameter VOI in the right lobe of the liver appears to be a good method for a robust and reproducible assessment of the hepatic metabolism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4779086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47790862016-03-22 For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time Sher, Avigaëlle Lacoeuille, Franck Fosse, Pacôme Vervueren, Laurent Cahouet-Vannier, Aurélie Dabli, Djamel Bouchet, Francis Couturier, Olivier EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: This study is an assessment of the impact of acquisition times on SUV with [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT on healthy livers (reference organ with stable uptake over time) and on tumors. METHODS: One hundred six [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT were acquired in list mode over a single-bed position (livers (n = 48) or on tumors (n = 58)). Six independent datasets of different durations were reconstructed (from 1.5 to 10 min). SUV(max) (hottest voxel), SUV(peak) (maximum average SUV within a 1-cm(3) spherical volume), and SUV(average) were measured within a 3-cm-diameter volume of interest (VOI) in the right lobe of the liver. For [(18)F]FDG avid tumors (SUV(max) ≥ 5), the SUV(max), SUV(peak), and SUV(41%) (isocontour threshold method) were computed. RESULTS: For tumors, SUV(peak) values did not vary with acquisition time. SUV(max) displayed significant differences between 1.5- and 5–10-min reconstruction times. SUV(41%) was the most time-dependent parameter. For the liver, the SUV(average) was the sole parameter that did not vary over time. CONCLUSIONS: For [(18)F]FDG avid tumors, with short acquisition times, i.e., with new generations of PET systems, the SUV(peak) may be more robust than the SUV(max). The SUV(average) over a 3-cm-diameter VOI in the right lobe of the liver appears to be a good method for a robust and reproducible assessment of the hepatic metabolism. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4779086/ /pubmed/26944734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0177-8 Text en © Sher et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sher, Avigaëlle
Lacoeuille, Franck
Fosse, Pacôme
Vervueren, Laurent
Cahouet-Vannier, Aurélie
Dabli, Djamel
Bouchet, Francis
Couturier, Olivier
For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
title For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
title_full For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
title_fullStr For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
title_full_unstemmed For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
title_short For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
title_sort for avid glucose tumors, the suv peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)f]fdg-pet/ct quantification, regardless of acquisition time
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26944734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0177-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sheravigaelle foravidglucosetumorsthesuvpeakisthemostreliableparameterfor18ffdgpetctquantificationregardlessofacquisitiontime
AT lacoeuillefranck foravidglucosetumorsthesuvpeakisthemostreliableparameterfor18ffdgpetctquantificationregardlessofacquisitiontime
AT fossepacome foravidglucosetumorsthesuvpeakisthemostreliableparameterfor18ffdgpetctquantificationregardlessofacquisitiontime
AT vervuerenlaurent foravidglucosetumorsthesuvpeakisthemostreliableparameterfor18ffdgpetctquantificationregardlessofacquisitiontime
AT cahouetvannieraurelie foravidglucosetumorsthesuvpeakisthemostreliableparameterfor18ffdgpetctquantificationregardlessofacquisitiontime
AT dablidjamel foravidglucosetumorsthesuvpeakisthemostreliableparameterfor18ffdgpetctquantificationregardlessofacquisitiontime
AT bouchetfrancis foravidglucosetumorsthesuvpeakisthemostreliableparameterfor18ffdgpetctquantificationregardlessofacquisitiontime
AT couturierolivier foravidglucosetumorsthesuvpeakisthemostreliableparameterfor18ffdgpetctquantificationregardlessofacquisitiontime