Cargando…

Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity levels are rising worldwide with major implications for the health of the population and the prevalence of non-communicable diseases. Exercise referral schemes (ERS) continue to be a popular intervention utilised by healthcare practitioners to increase physical activi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan, Fiona, Battersby, Alysia, Weightman, Alison L, Searchfield, Lydia, Turley, Ruth, Morgan, Helen, Jagroo, James, Ellis, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26944952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2882-7
_version_ 1782419594580852736
author Morgan, Fiona
Battersby, Alysia
Weightman, Alison L
Searchfield, Lydia
Turley, Ruth
Morgan, Helen
Jagroo, James
Ellis, Simon
author_facet Morgan, Fiona
Battersby, Alysia
Weightman, Alison L
Searchfield, Lydia
Turley, Ruth
Morgan, Helen
Jagroo, James
Ellis, Simon
author_sort Morgan, Fiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity levels are rising worldwide with major implications for the health of the population and the prevalence of non-communicable diseases. Exercise referral schemes (ERS) continue to be a popular intervention utilised by healthcare practitioners to increase physical activity. We undertook a systematic review of views studies in order to inform guidance from the UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity. This paper reports on the participant views identified, to inform those seeking to refine schemes to increase attendance and adherence. METHODS: Fifteen databases and a wide range of websites and grey literature sources were searched systematically for publications from 1995 to June 2013. In addition, a range of supplementary methods including, a call for evidence by NICE, contacting authors, reference list checking and citation tracking were utilised to identify additional research. Studies were included where they detailed schemes for adults aged 19 years or older who were ‘inactive’ (i.e. they are not currently meeting UK physical activity guidelines). Study selection was conducted independently in duplicate. Quality assessment was undertaken by one reviewer and checked by a second, with 20 % of papers being considered independently in duplicate. Papers were coded in qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti. This review was reported in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement). RESULTS: Evidence from 33 UK-relevant studies identified that support from providers, other attendees and family was an important facilitator of adherence and ‘making exercise a habit’ post programme, as was the variety and personalised nature of sessions offered. Barriers to attendance included the inconvenient timing of sessions, their cost and location. An intimidating gym atmosphere, a dislike of the music and TV and a lack of confidence in operating gym equipment were frequently reported. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide valuable insights that commissioners and providers should consider. The main themes were consistent across a large number of studies and further research should concentrate on programmes that reflect these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4779205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47792052016-03-06 Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators Morgan, Fiona Battersby, Alysia Weightman, Alison L Searchfield, Lydia Turley, Ruth Morgan, Helen Jagroo, James Ellis, Simon BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity levels are rising worldwide with major implications for the health of the population and the prevalence of non-communicable diseases. Exercise referral schemes (ERS) continue to be a popular intervention utilised by healthcare practitioners to increase physical activity. We undertook a systematic review of views studies in order to inform guidance from the UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity. This paper reports on the participant views identified, to inform those seeking to refine schemes to increase attendance and adherence. METHODS: Fifteen databases and a wide range of websites and grey literature sources were searched systematically for publications from 1995 to June 2013. In addition, a range of supplementary methods including, a call for evidence by NICE, contacting authors, reference list checking and citation tracking were utilised to identify additional research. Studies were included where they detailed schemes for adults aged 19 years or older who were ‘inactive’ (i.e. they are not currently meeting UK physical activity guidelines). Study selection was conducted independently in duplicate. Quality assessment was undertaken by one reviewer and checked by a second, with 20 % of papers being considered independently in duplicate. Papers were coded in qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti. This review was reported in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement). RESULTS: Evidence from 33 UK-relevant studies identified that support from providers, other attendees and family was an important facilitator of adherence and ‘making exercise a habit’ post programme, as was the variety and personalised nature of sessions offered. Barriers to attendance included the inconvenient timing of sessions, their cost and location. An intimidating gym atmosphere, a dislike of the music and TV and a lack of confidence in operating gym equipment were frequently reported. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide valuable insights that commissioners and providers should consider. The main themes were consistent across a large number of studies and further research should concentrate on programmes that reflect these findings. BioMed Central 2016-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4779205/ /pubmed/26944952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2882-7 Text en © Morgan et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morgan, Fiona
Battersby, Alysia
Weightman, Alison L
Searchfield, Lydia
Turley, Ruth
Morgan, Helen
Jagroo, James
Ellis, Simon
Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
title Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
title_full Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
title_fullStr Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
title_short Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators
title_sort adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? a systematic review of barriers and facilitators
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26944952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2882-7
work_keys_str_mv AT morganfiona adherencetoexercisereferralschemesbyparticipantswhatdoprovidersandcommissionersneedtoknowasystematicreviewofbarriersandfacilitators
AT battersbyalysia adherencetoexercisereferralschemesbyparticipantswhatdoprovidersandcommissionersneedtoknowasystematicreviewofbarriersandfacilitators
AT weightmanalisonl adherencetoexercisereferralschemesbyparticipantswhatdoprovidersandcommissionersneedtoknowasystematicreviewofbarriersandfacilitators
AT searchfieldlydia adherencetoexercisereferralschemesbyparticipantswhatdoprovidersandcommissionersneedtoknowasystematicreviewofbarriersandfacilitators
AT turleyruth adherencetoexercisereferralschemesbyparticipantswhatdoprovidersandcommissionersneedtoknowasystematicreviewofbarriersandfacilitators
AT morganhelen adherencetoexercisereferralschemesbyparticipantswhatdoprovidersandcommissionersneedtoknowasystematicreviewofbarriersandfacilitators
AT jagroojames adherencetoexercisereferralschemesbyparticipantswhatdoprovidersandcommissionersneedtoknowasystematicreviewofbarriersandfacilitators
AT ellissimon adherencetoexercisereferralschemesbyparticipantswhatdoprovidersandcommissionersneedtoknowasystematicreviewofbarriersandfacilitators