Cargando…

High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics

BACKGROUD: To evaluate the symmetry of corneal biomechanical metrics, measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA) and self-built corneal inflation test platform, in bilateral rabbit corneas and to investigate their relationship with physical intraocular pressure (IOPp). METHODS: Twenty fresh en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, XiaoBo, Bao, FangJun, Geraghty, Brendan, Huang, JinHai, Yu, AYong, Wang, QinMei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0037-7
_version_ 1782419607042129920
author Zheng, XiaoBo
Bao, FangJun
Geraghty, Brendan
Huang, JinHai
Yu, AYong
Wang, QinMei
author_facet Zheng, XiaoBo
Bao, FangJun
Geraghty, Brendan
Huang, JinHai
Yu, AYong
Wang, QinMei
author_sort Zheng, XiaoBo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUD: To evaluate the symmetry of corneal biomechanical metrics, measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA) and self-built corneal inflation test platform, in bilateral rabbit corneas and to investigate their relationship with physical intraocular pressure (IOPp). METHODS: Twenty fresh enucleated eyes from ten rabbits were used for ex vivo whole ocular globe inflation. IOP was increased from 7.5 to 37.5 mmHg with 7.5 mmHg steps and biomechanical metrics were acquired using the ORA. At least 3 examinations were performed at each pressure stage. Two biomechanical metrics, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were recorded and analyzed as a function of IOPp. Corneal specimens were then excised from the intact ocular globe and tested under inflation conditions up to 45.7 mmHg posterior pressure. The experimental pressure-deformation data was analyzed using an inverse modeling procedure to derive the stress-strain behavior of the cornea. RESULTS: A comparison of corneal shape parameters showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between bilateral eyes. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in values of CH, CRF and corneal stiffness (as measured by the tangent modulus, Et) between bilateral eyes (CH: F = 0.94, P = 0.54; CRF: F = 4.42, P = 0.35; Et: F = 3.15, P = 0.12) at different pressure levels. IOPp was highly correlated with CRF while the relationship with CH was less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: An obvious interocular symmetry in biomechanical metrics is found in this research. IOP has been shown to have important influences on the value of CRF provided by ORA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4779259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47792592016-03-06 High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics Zheng, XiaoBo Bao, FangJun Geraghty, Brendan Huang, JinHai Yu, AYong Wang, QinMei Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUD: To evaluate the symmetry of corneal biomechanical metrics, measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA) and self-built corneal inflation test platform, in bilateral rabbit corneas and to investigate their relationship with physical intraocular pressure (IOPp). METHODS: Twenty fresh enucleated eyes from ten rabbits were used for ex vivo whole ocular globe inflation. IOP was increased from 7.5 to 37.5 mmHg with 7.5 mmHg steps and biomechanical metrics were acquired using the ORA. At least 3 examinations were performed at each pressure stage. Two biomechanical metrics, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were recorded and analyzed as a function of IOPp. Corneal specimens were then excised from the intact ocular globe and tested under inflation conditions up to 45.7 mmHg posterior pressure. The experimental pressure-deformation data was analyzed using an inverse modeling procedure to derive the stress-strain behavior of the cornea. RESULTS: A comparison of corneal shape parameters showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between bilateral eyes. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in values of CH, CRF and corneal stiffness (as measured by the tangent modulus, Et) between bilateral eyes (CH: F = 0.94, P = 0.54; CRF: F = 4.42, P = 0.35; Et: F = 3.15, P = 0.12) at different pressure levels. IOPp was highly correlated with CRF while the relationship with CH was less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: An obvious interocular symmetry in biomechanical metrics is found in this research. IOP has been shown to have important influences on the value of CRF provided by ORA. BioMed Central 2016-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4779259/ /pubmed/26949709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0037-7 Text en © Zheng et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zheng, XiaoBo
Bao, FangJun
Geraghty, Brendan
Huang, JinHai
Yu, AYong
Wang, QinMei
High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics
title High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics
title_full High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics
title_fullStr High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics
title_full_unstemmed High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics
title_short High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics
title_sort high intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0037-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengxiaobo highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics
AT baofangjun highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics
AT geraghtybrendan highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics
AT huangjinhai highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics
AT yuayong highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics
AT wangqinmei highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics