Cargando…
High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics
BACKGROUD: To evaluate the symmetry of corneal biomechanical metrics, measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA) and self-built corneal inflation test platform, in bilateral rabbit corneas and to investigate their relationship with physical intraocular pressure (IOPp). METHODS: Twenty fresh en...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0037-7 |
_version_ | 1782419607042129920 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, XiaoBo Bao, FangJun Geraghty, Brendan Huang, JinHai Yu, AYong Wang, QinMei |
author_facet | Zheng, XiaoBo Bao, FangJun Geraghty, Brendan Huang, JinHai Yu, AYong Wang, QinMei |
author_sort | Zheng, XiaoBo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUD: To evaluate the symmetry of corneal biomechanical metrics, measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA) and self-built corneal inflation test platform, in bilateral rabbit corneas and to investigate their relationship with physical intraocular pressure (IOPp). METHODS: Twenty fresh enucleated eyes from ten rabbits were used for ex vivo whole ocular globe inflation. IOP was increased from 7.5 to 37.5 mmHg with 7.5 mmHg steps and biomechanical metrics were acquired using the ORA. At least 3 examinations were performed at each pressure stage. Two biomechanical metrics, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were recorded and analyzed as a function of IOPp. Corneal specimens were then excised from the intact ocular globe and tested under inflation conditions up to 45.7 mmHg posterior pressure. The experimental pressure-deformation data was analyzed using an inverse modeling procedure to derive the stress-strain behavior of the cornea. RESULTS: A comparison of corneal shape parameters showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between bilateral eyes. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in values of CH, CRF and corneal stiffness (as measured by the tangent modulus, Et) between bilateral eyes (CH: F = 0.94, P = 0.54; CRF: F = 4.42, P = 0.35; Et: F = 3.15, P = 0.12) at different pressure levels. IOPp was highly correlated with CRF while the relationship with CH was less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: An obvious interocular symmetry in biomechanical metrics is found in this research. IOP has been shown to have important influences on the value of CRF provided by ORA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4779259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47792592016-03-06 High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics Zheng, XiaoBo Bao, FangJun Geraghty, Brendan Huang, JinHai Yu, AYong Wang, QinMei Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUD: To evaluate the symmetry of corneal biomechanical metrics, measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA) and self-built corneal inflation test platform, in bilateral rabbit corneas and to investigate their relationship with physical intraocular pressure (IOPp). METHODS: Twenty fresh enucleated eyes from ten rabbits were used for ex vivo whole ocular globe inflation. IOP was increased from 7.5 to 37.5 mmHg with 7.5 mmHg steps and biomechanical metrics were acquired using the ORA. At least 3 examinations were performed at each pressure stage. Two biomechanical metrics, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were recorded and analyzed as a function of IOPp. Corneal specimens were then excised from the intact ocular globe and tested under inflation conditions up to 45.7 mmHg posterior pressure. The experimental pressure-deformation data was analyzed using an inverse modeling procedure to derive the stress-strain behavior of the cornea. RESULTS: A comparison of corneal shape parameters showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between bilateral eyes. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in values of CH, CRF and corneal stiffness (as measured by the tangent modulus, Et) between bilateral eyes (CH: F = 0.94, P = 0.54; CRF: F = 4.42, P = 0.35; Et: F = 3.15, P = 0.12) at different pressure levels. IOPp was highly correlated with CRF while the relationship with CH was less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: An obvious interocular symmetry in biomechanical metrics is found in this research. IOP has been shown to have important influences on the value of CRF provided by ORA. BioMed Central 2016-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4779259/ /pubmed/26949709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0037-7 Text en © Zheng et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zheng, XiaoBo Bao, FangJun Geraghty, Brendan Huang, JinHai Yu, AYong Wang, QinMei High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics |
title | High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics |
title_full | High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics |
title_fullStr | High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics |
title_full_unstemmed | High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics |
title_short | High intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics |
title_sort | high intercorneal symmetry in corneal biomechanical metrics |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0037-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengxiaobo highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics AT baofangjun highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics AT geraghtybrendan highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics AT huangjinhai highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics AT yuayong highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics AT wangqinmei highintercornealsymmetryincornealbiomechanicalmetrics |