Cargando…

Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy

Purpose. To evaluate possible speeding up recovery time after retinal detachment (RD) surgery using biofeedback strategy. Methods. A total of 52 eyes were selected. After surgery, patients were divided into two groups: group A, including patients submitted to biofeedback with MP-1 strategy; group B,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vingolo, Enzo M., Fragiotta, Serena, Domanico, Daniela, Limoli, Paolo G., Nebbioso, Marcella, Spadea, Leopoldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8092396
_version_ 1782419632797253632
author Vingolo, Enzo M.
Fragiotta, Serena
Domanico, Daniela
Limoli, Paolo G.
Nebbioso, Marcella
Spadea, Leopoldo
author_facet Vingolo, Enzo M.
Fragiotta, Serena
Domanico, Daniela
Limoli, Paolo G.
Nebbioso, Marcella
Spadea, Leopoldo
author_sort Vingolo, Enzo M.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To evaluate possible speeding up recovery time after retinal detachment (RD) surgery using biofeedback strategy. Methods. A total of 52 eyes were selected. After surgery, patients were divided into two groups: group A, including patients submitted to biofeedback with MP-1 strategy; group B, patients who received common care strategy. Biofeedback strategy was started 15 days after the suspension of cycloplegic eye drops in buckling procedure or after silicone oil removal in the vitrectomized eyes. Controls were scheduled at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 weeks. Results. At baseline, there was no significant difference in BCVA between groups (P = 0.4230). At the end of biofeedback treatment (WK 6) BCVA of group A was significantly better (P < 0.001) than group B and BCVA was still better in group A than group B at WK 12 (P = 0.028) and at WK 18 (P = 0.041). Conclusions. Visual recovery after RD surgery is still unclear, and it does not depend on entity of the RD. Our data demonstrate that in biofeedback group there was a significant recovery in visual performances that still remains evident after 3 months from the baseline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4779528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47795282016-03-20 Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy Vingolo, Enzo M. Fragiotta, Serena Domanico, Daniela Limoli, Paolo G. Nebbioso, Marcella Spadea, Leopoldo J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To evaluate possible speeding up recovery time after retinal detachment (RD) surgery using biofeedback strategy. Methods. A total of 52 eyes were selected. After surgery, patients were divided into two groups: group A, including patients submitted to biofeedback with MP-1 strategy; group B, patients who received common care strategy. Biofeedback strategy was started 15 days after the suspension of cycloplegic eye drops in buckling procedure or after silicone oil removal in the vitrectomized eyes. Controls were scheduled at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 weeks. Results. At baseline, there was no significant difference in BCVA between groups (P = 0.4230). At the end of biofeedback treatment (WK 6) BCVA of group A was significantly better (P < 0.001) than group B and BCVA was still better in group A than group B at WK 12 (P = 0.028) and at WK 18 (P = 0.041). Conclusions. Visual recovery after RD surgery is still unclear, and it does not depend on entity of the RD. Our data demonstrate that in biofeedback group there was a significant recovery in visual performances that still remains evident after 3 months from the baseline. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4779528/ /pubmed/26998353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8092396 Text en Copyright © 2016 Enzo M. Vingolo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vingolo, Enzo M.
Fragiotta, Serena
Domanico, Daniela
Limoli, Paolo G.
Nebbioso, Marcella
Spadea, Leopoldo
Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy
title Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy
title_full Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy
title_fullStr Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy
title_short Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy
title_sort visual recovery after primary retinal detachment surgery: biofeedback rehabilitative strategy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26998353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8092396
work_keys_str_mv AT vingoloenzom visualrecoveryafterprimaryretinaldetachmentsurgerybiofeedbackrehabilitativestrategy
AT fragiottaserena visualrecoveryafterprimaryretinaldetachmentsurgerybiofeedbackrehabilitativestrategy
AT domanicodaniela visualrecoveryafterprimaryretinaldetachmentsurgerybiofeedbackrehabilitativestrategy
AT limolipaolog visualrecoveryafterprimaryretinaldetachmentsurgerybiofeedbackrehabilitativestrategy
AT nebbiosomarcella visualrecoveryafterprimaryretinaldetachmentsurgerybiofeedbackrehabilitativestrategy
AT spadealeopoldo visualrecoveryafterprimaryretinaldetachmentsurgerybiofeedbackrehabilitativestrategy