Cargando…

Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles—a TMS Study

The amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) varies from trial-to-trial. Synchronous oscillations in cortical neuronal excitability contribute to this variability, however it is not known how different frequencies of stimulation influence MEP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sale, Martin V., Rogasch, Nigel C., Nordstrom, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00100
_version_ 1782419678127194112
author Sale, Martin V.
Rogasch, Nigel C.
Nordstrom, Michael A.
author_facet Sale, Martin V.
Rogasch, Nigel C.
Nordstrom, Michael A.
author_sort Sale, Martin V.
collection PubMed
description The amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) varies from trial-to-trial. Synchronous oscillations in cortical neuronal excitability contribute to this variability, however it is not known how different frequencies of stimulation influence MEP variability, and whether these oscillations are rhythmic or aperiodic. We stimulated the motor cortex with TMS at different regular (i.e., rhythmic) rates, and compared this with pseudo-random (aperiodic) timing. In 18 subjects, TMS was applied at three regular frequencies (0.05 Hz, 0.2 Hz, 1 Hz) and one aperiodic frequency (mean 0.2 Hz). MEPs (n = 50) were recorded from three intrinsic hand muscles of the left hand with different functional and anatomical relations. MEP amplitude correlation was highest for the functionally related muscle pair, less for the anatomically related muscle pair and least for the functionally- and anatomically-unrelated muscle pair. MEP correlations were greatest with 1 Hz, and least for stimulation at 0.05 Hz. Corticospinal neuron synchrony is higher with shorter TMS intervals. Further, corticospinal neuron synchrony is similar irrespective of whether the stimulation is periodic or aperiodic. These findings suggest TMS frequency is a crucial consideration for studies using TMS to probe correlated activity between muscle pairs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4779882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47798822016-03-24 Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles—a TMS Study Sale, Martin V. Rogasch, Nigel C. Nordstrom, Michael A. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) varies from trial-to-trial. Synchronous oscillations in cortical neuronal excitability contribute to this variability, however it is not known how different frequencies of stimulation influence MEP variability, and whether these oscillations are rhythmic or aperiodic. We stimulated the motor cortex with TMS at different regular (i.e., rhythmic) rates, and compared this with pseudo-random (aperiodic) timing. In 18 subjects, TMS was applied at three regular frequencies (0.05 Hz, 0.2 Hz, 1 Hz) and one aperiodic frequency (mean 0.2 Hz). MEPs (n = 50) were recorded from three intrinsic hand muscles of the left hand with different functional and anatomical relations. MEP amplitude correlation was highest for the functionally related muscle pair, less for the anatomically related muscle pair and least for the functionally- and anatomically-unrelated muscle pair. MEP correlations were greatest with 1 Hz, and least for stimulation at 0.05 Hz. Corticospinal neuron synchrony is higher with shorter TMS intervals. Further, corticospinal neuron synchrony is similar irrespective of whether the stimulation is periodic or aperiodic. These findings suggest TMS frequency is a crucial consideration for studies using TMS to probe correlated activity between muscle pairs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4779882/ /pubmed/27014031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00100 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sale, Rogasch and Nordstrom. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sale, Martin V.
Rogasch, Nigel C.
Nordstrom, Michael A.
Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles—a TMS Study
title Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles—a TMS Study
title_full Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles—a TMS Study
title_fullStr Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles—a TMS Study
title_full_unstemmed Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles—a TMS Study
title_short Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles—a TMS Study
title_sort different stimulation frequencies alter synchronous fluctuations in motor evoked potential amplitude of intrinsic hand muscles—a tms study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4779882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00100
work_keys_str_mv AT salemartinv differentstimulationfrequenciesaltersynchronousfluctuationsinmotorevokedpotentialamplitudeofintrinsichandmusclesatmsstudy
AT rogaschnigelc differentstimulationfrequenciesaltersynchronousfluctuationsinmotorevokedpotentialamplitudeofintrinsichandmusclesatmsstudy
AT nordstrommichaela differentstimulationfrequenciesaltersynchronousfluctuationsinmotorevokedpotentialamplitudeofintrinsichandmusclesatmsstudy