Cargando…
Lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials
BACKGROUND: High sustained virological response at 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12) with 12 weeks of simeprevir and sofosbuvir±ribavirin (SMV+SOF±RBV) has been demonstrated in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) but is based on limited data. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of availab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000056 |
_version_ | 1782419704418140160 |
---|---|
author | Yee, Brittany E Nguyen, Nghia H Jin, Minjuan Lutchman, Glen Lim, Joseph K Nguyen, Mindie H |
author_facet | Yee, Brittany E Nguyen, Nghia H Jin, Minjuan Lutchman, Glen Lim, Joseph K Nguyen, Mindie H |
author_sort | Yee, Brittany E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High sustained virological response at 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12) with 12 weeks of simeprevir and sofosbuvir±ribavirin (SMV+SOF±RBV) has been demonstrated in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) but is based on limited data. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of available data evaluating the effectiveness of SMV+SOF±RBV in HCV-1. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search in June 2015 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of HCV-1 patients treated with 12 weeks of SMV+SOF±RBV. Original studies with SVR12 data in ≥5 HCV-1 patients were included. We excluded studies on liver transplant recipients and/or patients co-infected with HIV or hepatitis B/D. We estimated pooled effect sizes using a random-effects model and evaluated heterogeneity with Cochrane Q-test, p≤0.10 and I(2) statistic ≥50%. RESULTS: Pooled SVR12 was 85.6% (CI 81.3% to 89.0%) in 1389 HCV-1 patients from 15 studies. On subgroup analysis, SVR12 was 83.9% (CI 79.4% to 87.5%) in observational studies, which was lower than 93.5% (CI 85.7% to 97.2%) in RCTs. A trend showed SVR12 was higher in mild fibrosis, 93.0% (CI 86.2% to 96.6%) compared with advanced fibrosis, 81.5% (CI 75.7% to 86.1%), OR 2.22 (CI 0.79 to 6.25, p=0.131). There was no significant difference in SVR12 rates between HCV-1a, 89.9% (CI 81.9% to 94.6%) and HCV-1b, 89.0% (CI 78.9% to 94.6%) with OR 1.35 (CI 0.75 to 2.42, p=0.322). The most common pooled side effects were: headache 15.2% (n=55/361), fatigue 12.1% (n=78/646), nausea 9.5% (n=50/527) and rash 9.3% (n=68/728). CONCLUSIONS: SMV+SOF±RBV is an effective regimen in HCV-1 patients. The SVR12 rate in observational studies was lower than that in RCTs, which may reflect the more diverse patient population in real-world settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4780041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47800412016-03-10 Lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials Yee, Brittany E Nguyen, Nghia H Jin, Minjuan Lutchman, Glen Lim, Joseph K Nguyen, Mindie H BMJ Open Gastroenterol Meta Analysis BACKGROUND: High sustained virological response at 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12) with 12 weeks of simeprevir and sofosbuvir±ribavirin (SMV+SOF±RBV) has been demonstrated in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) but is based on limited data. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of available data evaluating the effectiveness of SMV+SOF±RBV in HCV-1. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search in June 2015 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of HCV-1 patients treated with 12 weeks of SMV+SOF±RBV. Original studies with SVR12 data in ≥5 HCV-1 patients were included. We excluded studies on liver transplant recipients and/or patients co-infected with HIV or hepatitis B/D. We estimated pooled effect sizes using a random-effects model and evaluated heterogeneity with Cochrane Q-test, p≤0.10 and I(2) statistic ≥50%. RESULTS: Pooled SVR12 was 85.6% (CI 81.3% to 89.0%) in 1389 HCV-1 patients from 15 studies. On subgroup analysis, SVR12 was 83.9% (CI 79.4% to 87.5%) in observational studies, which was lower than 93.5% (CI 85.7% to 97.2%) in RCTs. A trend showed SVR12 was higher in mild fibrosis, 93.0% (CI 86.2% to 96.6%) compared with advanced fibrosis, 81.5% (CI 75.7% to 86.1%), OR 2.22 (CI 0.79 to 6.25, p=0.131). There was no significant difference in SVR12 rates between HCV-1a, 89.9% (CI 81.9% to 94.6%) and HCV-1b, 89.0% (CI 78.9% to 94.6%) with OR 1.35 (CI 0.75 to 2.42, p=0.322). The most common pooled side effects were: headache 15.2% (n=55/361), fatigue 12.1% (n=78/646), nausea 9.5% (n=50/527) and rash 9.3% (n=68/728). CONCLUSIONS: SMV+SOF±RBV is an effective regimen in HCV-1 patients. The SVR12 rate in observational studies was lower than that in RCTs, which may reflect the more diverse patient population in real-world settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4780041/ /pubmed/26966547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000056 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Meta Analysis Yee, Brittany E Nguyen, Nghia H Jin, Minjuan Lutchman, Glen Lim, Joseph K Nguyen, Mindie H Lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials |
title | Lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials |
title_full | Lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials |
title_short | Lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in HCV genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials |
title_sort | lower response to simeprevir and sofosbuvir in hcv genotype 1 in routine practice compared with clinical trials |
topic | Meta Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeebrittanye lowerresponsetosimeprevirandsofosbuvirinhcvgenotype1inroutinepracticecomparedwithclinicaltrials AT nguyennghiah lowerresponsetosimeprevirandsofosbuvirinhcvgenotype1inroutinepracticecomparedwithclinicaltrials AT jinminjuan lowerresponsetosimeprevirandsofosbuvirinhcvgenotype1inroutinepracticecomparedwithclinicaltrials AT lutchmanglen lowerresponsetosimeprevirandsofosbuvirinhcvgenotype1inroutinepracticecomparedwithclinicaltrials AT limjosephk lowerresponsetosimeprevirandsofosbuvirinhcvgenotype1inroutinepracticecomparedwithclinicaltrials AT nguyenmindieh lowerresponsetosimeprevirandsofosbuvirinhcvgenotype1inroutinepracticecomparedwithclinicaltrials |