Cargando…

Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries

BACKGROUND: Immigration detention has been shown to negatively affect the health and well-being of detainees. The aim of the study was to describe and compare policies and practices that could affect the health and well-being of immigrant detainees in the Benelux countries (Belgium, the Netherlands,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puthoopparambil, Soorej J., Bjerneld, Magdalena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26950568
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.30358
_version_ 1782419717429919744
author Puthoopparambil, Soorej J.
Bjerneld, Magdalena
author_facet Puthoopparambil, Soorej J.
Bjerneld, Magdalena
author_sort Puthoopparambil, Soorej J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immigration detention has been shown to negatively affect the health and well-being of detainees. The aim of the study was to describe and compare policies and practices that could affect the health and well-being of immigrant detainees in the Benelux countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg) to those in Sweden. DESIGN: This was a case study. Data were collected in two phases using a questionnaire developed particularly for this study. In the first phase, authorities in the Benelux countries responded to the questionnaire via email. During the second phase, a research team visited detention centres in the Benelux countries to observe and further explore, strengthening findings through triangulation. Data on Swedish detention centres were collected in previous studies. RESULTS: Compared to the Benelux countries, Sweden has limited health care provision available in the detention centres. Swedish detention centres did not have mental health care professionals working at the centres and had fewer restrictions within the centres with regard to access to mobile phone, internet, and various recreational activities. Compared to Sweden, the detention centres in the Benelux countries have more staff categories providing services to the detainees that are provided with relevant and timely on-the-job training. All the countries, except Belgium, provide subsistence allowances to detainees. CONCLUSION: Despite the Common European Asylum System framework, differences exist among the four European Union member states in providing services to immigrant detainees. This study highlights these differences, thereby providing a window on how these diverse approaches may serve as a learning tool for improving services offered to immigrant detainees. In Sweden, the health care available to detainees and training and recruitment of staff should be improved, while the Benelux countries should strive to reduce restrictions within detention centres.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4780110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47801102016-04-04 Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries Puthoopparambil, Soorej J. Bjerneld, Magdalena Glob Health Action Original Article BACKGROUND: Immigration detention has been shown to negatively affect the health and well-being of detainees. The aim of the study was to describe and compare policies and practices that could affect the health and well-being of immigrant detainees in the Benelux countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg) to those in Sweden. DESIGN: This was a case study. Data were collected in two phases using a questionnaire developed particularly for this study. In the first phase, authorities in the Benelux countries responded to the questionnaire via email. During the second phase, a research team visited detention centres in the Benelux countries to observe and further explore, strengthening findings through triangulation. Data on Swedish detention centres were collected in previous studies. RESULTS: Compared to the Benelux countries, Sweden has limited health care provision available in the detention centres. Swedish detention centres did not have mental health care professionals working at the centres and had fewer restrictions within the centres with regard to access to mobile phone, internet, and various recreational activities. Compared to Sweden, the detention centres in the Benelux countries have more staff categories providing services to the detainees that are provided with relevant and timely on-the-job training. All the countries, except Belgium, provide subsistence allowances to detainees. CONCLUSION: Despite the Common European Asylum System framework, differences exist among the four European Union member states in providing services to immigrant detainees. This study highlights these differences, thereby providing a window on how these diverse approaches may serve as a learning tool for improving services offered to immigrant detainees. In Sweden, the health care available to detainees and training and recruitment of staff should be improved, while the Benelux countries should strive to reduce restrictions within detention centres. Co-Action Publishing 2016-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4780110/ /pubmed/26950568 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.30358 Text en © 2016 Soorej J. Puthoopparambil and Magdalena Bjerneld http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Article
Puthoopparambil, Soorej J.
Bjerneld, Magdalena
Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries
title Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries
title_full Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries
title_fullStr Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries
title_full_unstemmed Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries
title_short Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries
title_sort detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in sweden and in the benelux countries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26950568
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.30358
work_keys_str_mv AT puthoopparambilsoorejj detaineesstaffandhealthcareservicesinimmigrationdetentioncentresadescriptivecomparisonofdetentionsystemsinswedenandinthebeneluxcountries
AT bjerneldmagdalena detaineesstaffandhealthcareservicesinimmigrationdetentioncentresadescriptivecomparisonofdetentionsystemsinswedenandinthebeneluxcountries