Cargando…

The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety

Both major depressive disorder and the anxiety disorders are major causes of disability and markedly contribute to a significant global burden of the disease worldwide. In part because of the significant socioeconomic burden associated with these disorders, theories have been developed to specifical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montoya, Alonso, Bruins, Robert, Katzman, Martin A, Blier, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27042068
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S91311
_version_ 1782419735501078528
author Montoya, Alonso
Bruins, Robert
Katzman, Martin A
Blier, Pierre
author_facet Montoya, Alonso
Bruins, Robert
Katzman, Martin A
Blier, Pierre
author_sort Montoya, Alonso
collection PubMed
description Both major depressive disorder and the anxiety disorders are major causes of disability and markedly contribute to a significant global burden of the disease worldwide. In part because of the significant socioeconomic burden associated with these disorders, theories have been developed to specifically build clinical treatment approaches. One such theory, the monoaminergic hypothesis, has led to the development of several generations of selective and nonselective inhibitors of transporters of serotonin and norepinephrine, with the goal of augmenting monoaminergic transmission. These efforts have led to considerable success in the development of antidepressant therapeutics. However, there is a strong correlation between enhanced noradrenergic activity and fear and anxiety. Consequently, some physicians have expressed concerns that the same enhanced noradrenergic activity that alleviates depression could also promote anxiety. The fact that the serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors are successfully used in the treatment of anxiety and panic disorders seems paradoxical. This review was undertaken to determine if any clinical evidence exists to show that serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors can cause anxiety. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and the results limited to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies performed in nongeriatric adults and with clear outcome measures were reported. Based on these criteria, a total of 52 studies were examined. Patients in these studies suffered from depression or anxiety disorders (generalized and social anxiety disorders, panic disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder). The large majority of these studies employed venlafaxine or duloxetine, and the remainder used tri-cyclic antidepressants, atomoxetine, or reboxetine. All the studies reported clinically significant alleviation of depressive and/or anxious symptoms by these therapeutics. In none of these studies was anxiety a treatment-emergent adverse effect. This review argues against the impression that enhanced generalized noradrenergic activity promotes the emergence of anxiety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4780187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47801872016-04-01 The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety Montoya, Alonso Bruins, Robert Katzman, Martin A Blier, Pierre Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Review Both major depressive disorder and the anxiety disorders are major causes of disability and markedly contribute to a significant global burden of the disease worldwide. In part because of the significant socioeconomic burden associated with these disorders, theories have been developed to specifically build clinical treatment approaches. One such theory, the monoaminergic hypothesis, has led to the development of several generations of selective and nonselective inhibitors of transporters of serotonin and norepinephrine, with the goal of augmenting monoaminergic transmission. These efforts have led to considerable success in the development of antidepressant therapeutics. However, there is a strong correlation between enhanced noradrenergic activity and fear and anxiety. Consequently, some physicians have expressed concerns that the same enhanced noradrenergic activity that alleviates depression could also promote anxiety. The fact that the serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors are successfully used in the treatment of anxiety and panic disorders seems paradoxical. This review was undertaken to determine if any clinical evidence exists to show that serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors can cause anxiety. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and the results limited to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies performed in nongeriatric adults and with clear outcome measures were reported. Based on these criteria, a total of 52 studies were examined. Patients in these studies suffered from depression or anxiety disorders (generalized and social anxiety disorders, panic disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder). The large majority of these studies employed venlafaxine or duloxetine, and the remainder used tri-cyclic antidepressants, atomoxetine, or reboxetine. All the studies reported clinically significant alleviation of depressive and/or anxious symptoms by these therapeutics. In none of these studies was anxiety a treatment-emergent adverse effect. This review argues against the impression that enhanced generalized noradrenergic activity promotes the emergence of anxiety. Dove Medical Press 2016-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4780187/ /pubmed/27042068 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S91311 Text en © 2016 Montoya et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Montoya, Alonso
Bruins, Robert
Katzman, Martin A
Blier, Pierre
The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety
title The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety
title_full The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety
title_fullStr The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety
title_full_unstemmed The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety
title_short The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety
title_sort noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27042068
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S91311
work_keys_str_mv AT montoyaalonso thenoradrenergicparadoximplicationsinthemanagementofdepressionandanxiety
AT bruinsrobert thenoradrenergicparadoximplicationsinthemanagementofdepressionandanxiety
AT katzmanmartina thenoradrenergicparadoximplicationsinthemanagementofdepressionandanxiety
AT blierpierre thenoradrenergicparadoximplicationsinthemanagementofdepressionandanxiety
AT montoyaalonso noradrenergicparadoximplicationsinthemanagementofdepressionandanxiety
AT bruinsrobert noradrenergicparadoximplicationsinthemanagementofdepressionandanxiety
AT katzmanmartina noradrenergicparadoximplicationsinthemanagementofdepressionandanxiety
AT blierpierre noradrenergicparadoximplicationsinthemanagementofdepressionandanxiety