Cargando…

Systemic Immunosuppression in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review

Cornea transplantation has a high success rate and typically only requires topical immunomodulation. However, in high-risk cases, systemic immunosuppression can be used. We conducted a systematic review on the efficacy and side effects of systemic immunosuppression for high-risk cornea transplantati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bali, Shveta, Filek, Richard, Si, Francie, Hodge, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26985246
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2326w
_version_ 1782419773794025472
author Bali, Shveta
Filek, Richard
Si, Francie
Hodge, William
author_facet Bali, Shveta
Filek, Richard
Si, Francie
Hodge, William
author_sort Bali, Shveta
collection PubMed
description Cornea transplantation has a high success rate and typically only requires topical immunomodulation. However, in high-risk cases, systemic immunosuppression can be used. We conducted a systematic review on the efficacy and side effects of systemic immunosuppression for high-risk cornea transplantation. The study population was 18 years old or older with a high-risk transplant (two or more clock hours of cornea vascularization or a previous failed graft or a graft needed because of herpes simplex keratitis). A comprehensive search strategy was performed with the help of an information specialist and content experts from ophthalmology. All study designs were accepted for assessment. Level 1 and level 2 screening was performed by two reviewers followed by data abstraction. Forest plots were created whenever possible to synthesize treatment effects. Quality assessment was done with a Downs and Blacks score. From 1,150 articles, 29 were ultimately used for data abstraction. The odds ratios (ORs) for clear graft survival in cyclosporine and controls were 2.43 (95% CI: 1.00 - 5.88) and 3.64 (95% CI: 1.48 - 8.91) for rejection free episodes. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) significantly improved the rejection free graft survival rates at 1 year (OR: 4.05, 95% CI: 1.83 - 8.96). The overall results suggested that both systemic cyclosporine and MMF improved 1-year rejection free graft survival in high-risk keratoplasty. Cyclosporine also significantly improved clear graft survival rates at 1 year; however, there were insufficient data to analyze the same in the MMF group. Higher quality studies are needed to understand this issue better.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4780489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47804892016-03-16 Systemic Immunosuppression in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review Bali, Shveta Filek, Richard Si, Francie Hodge, William J Clin Med Res Review Cornea transplantation has a high success rate and typically only requires topical immunomodulation. However, in high-risk cases, systemic immunosuppression can be used. We conducted a systematic review on the efficacy and side effects of systemic immunosuppression for high-risk cornea transplantation. The study population was 18 years old or older with a high-risk transplant (two or more clock hours of cornea vascularization or a previous failed graft or a graft needed because of herpes simplex keratitis). A comprehensive search strategy was performed with the help of an information specialist and content experts from ophthalmology. All study designs were accepted for assessment. Level 1 and level 2 screening was performed by two reviewers followed by data abstraction. Forest plots were created whenever possible to synthesize treatment effects. Quality assessment was done with a Downs and Blacks score. From 1,150 articles, 29 were ultimately used for data abstraction. The odds ratios (ORs) for clear graft survival in cyclosporine and controls were 2.43 (95% CI: 1.00 - 5.88) and 3.64 (95% CI: 1.48 - 8.91) for rejection free episodes. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) significantly improved the rejection free graft survival rates at 1 year (OR: 4.05, 95% CI: 1.83 - 8.96). The overall results suggested that both systemic cyclosporine and MMF improved 1-year rejection free graft survival in high-risk keratoplasty. Cyclosporine also significantly improved clear graft survival rates at 1 year; however, there were insufficient data to analyze the same in the MMF group. Higher quality studies are needed to understand this issue better. Elmer Press 2016-04 2016-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4780489/ /pubmed/26985246 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2326w Text en Copyright 2016, Bali et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Bali, Shveta
Filek, Richard
Si, Francie
Hodge, William
Systemic Immunosuppression in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review
title Systemic Immunosuppression in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full Systemic Immunosuppression in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Systemic Immunosuppression in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Systemic Immunosuppression in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review
title_short Systemic Immunosuppression in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review
title_sort systemic immunosuppression in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26985246
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2326w
work_keys_str_mv AT balishveta systemicimmunosuppressioninhighriskpenetratingkeratoplastyasystematicreview
AT filekrichard systemicimmunosuppressioninhighriskpenetratingkeratoplastyasystematicreview
AT sifrancie systemicimmunosuppressioninhighriskpenetratingkeratoplastyasystematicreview
AT hodgewilliam systemicimmunosuppressioninhighriskpenetratingkeratoplastyasystematicreview