Cargando…
Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions
The global increase in the prevalence of obesity has dramatically increased interest in understanding the factors that influence human total energy expenditure (TEE). This in turn has increased interest in the doubly labeled water (DLW) method, a technique for measurement of total energy expenditure...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962472 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2165-7904.S5-002 |
_version_ | 1782419820517523456 |
---|---|
author | Bhutani, Surabhi Racine, Natalie Shriver, Tim Schoeller, Dale A |
author_facet | Bhutani, Surabhi Racine, Natalie Shriver, Tim Schoeller, Dale A |
author_sort | Bhutani, Surabhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The global increase in the prevalence of obesity has dramatically increased interest in understanding the factors that influence human total energy expenditure (TEE). This in turn has increased interest in the doubly labeled water (DLW) method, a technique for measurement of total energy expenditure in free-living humans. The increasing use of this method is attributed to its portability, objectivity, minimal invasiveness, high accuracy and good precision. Although a relatively standard protocol for the method has emerged, the new generation of users often is unfamiliar with rationale behind aspects of the protocol as well as the approaches to avoid or correct for in situations that are not covered by the standard protocol procedure. The primary uncommon situations like introduction of isotopically different diet and fluids with or without geographical relocation, seasonal and temperature variations, activity level of participants etc. during or prior to the DLW measurements can lead to shift in baseline abundance of (2)H and (18)O or tracer elimination, resulting in moderate to large errors in the measured TEE. These unique situations call for special modifications to the conventional protocol to minimize errors. The objective of the present review was to assemble a list of frequently asked questions and the issues they represent, and then examine the available literature to describe and explain the modifications to the standard DLW protocol to maintain the method’s accuracy. This discussion of DLW protocol modification can be an excellent resource for investigators who intend to use this measurement technique for interesting and uncommon study designs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4780846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47808462016-03-07 Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions Bhutani, Surabhi Racine, Natalie Shriver, Tim Schoeller, Dale A J Obes Weight Loss Ther Article The global increase in the prevalence of obesity has dramatically increased interest in understanding the factors that influence human total energy expenditure (TEE). This in turn has increased interest in the doubly labeled water (DLW) method, a technique for measurement of total energy expenditure in free-living humans. The increasing use of this method is attributed to its portability, objectivity, minimal invasiveness, high accuracy and good precision. Although a relatively standard protocol for the method has emerged, the new generation of users often is unfamiliar with rationale behind aspects of the protocol as well as the approaches to avoid or correct for in situations that are not covered by the standard protocol procedure. The primary uncommon situations like introduction of isotopically different diet and fluids with or without geographical relocation, seasonal and temperature variations, activity level of participants etc. during or prior to the DLW measurements can lead to shift in baseline abundance of (2)H and (18)O or tracer elimination, resulting in moderate to large errors in the measured TEE. These unique situations call for special modifications to the conventional protocol to minimize errors. The objective of the present review was to assemble a list of frequently asked questions and the issues they represent, and then examine the available literature to describe and explain the modifications to the standard DLW protocol to maintain the method’s accuracy. This discussion of DLW protocol modification can be an excellent resource for investigators who intend to use this measurement technique for interesting and uncommon study designs. 2015-07-30 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4780846/ /pubmed/26962472 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2165-7904.S5-002 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Bhutani, Surabhi Racine, Natalie Shriver, Tim Schoeller, Dale A Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions |
title | Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions |
title_full | Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions |
title_fullStr | Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions |
title_short | Special Considerations for Measuring Energy Expenditure with Doubly Labeled Water under Atypical Conditions |
title_sort | special considerations for measuring energy expenditure with doubly labeled water under atypical conditions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962472 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2165-7904.S5-002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhutanisurabhi specialconsiderationsformeasuringenergyexpenditurewithdoublylabeledwaterunderatypicalconditions AT racinenatalie specialconsiderationsformeasuringenergyexpenditurewithdoublylabeledwaterunderatypicalconditions AT shrivertim specialconsiderationsformeasuringenergyexpenditurewithdoublylabeledwaterunderatypicalconditions AT schoellerdalea specialconsiderationsformeasuringenergyexpenditurewithdoublylabeledwaterunderatypicalconditions |