Cargando…
Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience
The observation of other people’s actions recruits a network of areas including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG). These regions have been shown to be activated through both visual and auditory inputs. Intriguingly, previ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00094 |
_version_ | 1782419843810590720 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Yuxing Chen, Quanjing Lingnau, Angelika Han, Zaizhu Bi, Yanchao |
author_facet | Fang, Yuxing Chen, Quanjing Lingnau, Angelika Han, Zaizhu Bi, Yanchao |
author_sort | Fang, Yuxing |
collection | PubMed |
description | The observation of other people’s actions recruits a network of areas including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG). These regions have been shown to be activated through both visual and auditory inputs. Intriguingly, previous studies found no engagement of IFG and IPL for deaf participants during non-linguistic action observation, leading to the proposal that auditory experience or sign language usage might shape the functionality of these areas. To understand which variables induce plastic changes in areas recruited during the processing of other people’s actions, we examined the effects of tasks (action understanding and passive viewing) and effectors (arm actions vs. leg actions), as well as sign language experience in a group of 12 congenitally deaf signers and 13 hearing participants. In Experiment 1, we found a stronger activation during an action recognition task in comparison to a low-level visual control task in IFG, IPL and pMTG in both deaf signers and hearing individuals, but no effect of auditory or sign language experience. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of the first experiment using a passive viewing task. Together, our results provide robust evidence demonstrating that the response obtained in IFG, IPL, and pMTG during action recognition and passive viewing is not affected by auditory or sign language experience, adding further support for the supra-modal nature of these regions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4781852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47818522016-03-24 Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience Fang, Yuxing Chen, Quanjing Lingnau, Angelika Han, Zaizhu Bi, Yanchao Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The observation of other people’s actions recruits a network of areas including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG). These regions have been shown to be activated through both visual and auditory inputs. Intriguingly, previous studies found no engagement of IFG and IPL for deaf participants during non-linguistic action observation, leading to the proposal that auditory experience or sign language usage might shape the functionality of these areas. To understand which variables induce plastic changes in areas recruited during the processing of other people’s actions, we examined the effects of tasks (action understanding and passive viewing) and effectors (arm actions vs. leg actions), as well as sign language experience in a group of 12 congenitally deaf signers and 13 hearing participants. In Experiment 1, we found a stronger activation during an action recognition task in comparison to a low-level visual control task in IFG, IPL and pMTG in both deaf signers and hearing individuals, but no effect of auditory or sign language experience. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of the first experiment using a passive viewing task. Together, our results provide robust evidence demonstrating that the response obtained in IFG, IPL, and pMTG during action recognition and passive viewing is not affected by auditory or sign language experience, adding further support for the supra-modal nature of these regions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4781852/ /pubmed/27014025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00094 Text en Copyright © 2016 Fang, Chen, Lingnau, Han and Bi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Fang, Yuxing Chen, Quanjing Lingnau, Angelika Han, Zaizhu Bi, Yanchao Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience |
title | Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience |
title_full | Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience |
title_fullStr | Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience |
title_short | Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience |
title_sort | areas recruited during action understanding are not modulated by auditory or sign language experience |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangyuxing areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience AT chenquanjing areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience AT lingnauangelika areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience AT hanzaizhu areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience AT biyanchao areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience |