Cargando…

Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience

The observation of other people’s actions recruits a network of areas including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG). These regions have been shown to be activated through both visual and auditory inputs. Intriguingly, previ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Yuxing, Chen, Quanjing, Lingnau, Angelika, Han, Zaizhu, Bi, Yanchao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00094
_version_ 1782419843810590720
author Fang, Yuxing
Chen, Quanjing
Lingnau, Angelika
Han, Zaizhu
Bi, Yanchao
author_facet Fang, Yuxing
Chen, Quanjing
Lingnau, Angelika
Han, Zaizhu
Bi, Yanchao
author_sort Fang, Yuxing
collection PubMed
description The observation of other people’s actions recruits a network of areas including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG). These regions have been shown to be activated through both visual and auditory inputs. Intriguingly, previous studies found no engagement of IFG and IPL for deaf participants during non-linguistic action observation, leading to the proposal that auditory experience or sign language usage might shape the functionality of these areas. To understand which variables induce plastic changes in areas recruited during the processing of other people’s actions, we examined the effects of tasks (action understanding and passive viewing) and effectors (arm actions vs. leg actions), as well as sign language experience in a group of 12 congenitally deaf signers and 13 hearing participants. In Experiment 1, we found a stronger activation during an action recognition task in comparison to a low-level visual control task in IFG, IPL and pMTG in both deaf signers and hearing individuals, but no effect of auditory or sign language experience. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of the first experiment using a passive viewing task. Together, our results provide robust evidence demonstrating that the response obtained in IFG, IPL, and pMTG during action recognition and passive viewing is not affected by auditory or sign language experience, adding further support for the supra-modal nature of these regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4781852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47818522016-03-24 Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience Fang, Yuxing Chen, Quanjing Lingnau, Angelika Han, Zaizhu Bi, Yanchao Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The observation of other people’s actions recruits a network of areas including the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), the inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG). These regions have been shown to be activated through both visual and auditory inputs. Intriguingly, previous studies found no engagement of IFG and IPL for deaf participants during non-linguistic action observation, leading to the proposal that auditory experience or sign language usage might shape the functionality of these areas. To understand which variables induce plastic changes in areas recruited during the processing of other people’s actions, we examined the effects of tasks (action understanding and passive viewing) and effectors (arm actions vs. leg actions), as well as sign language experience in a group of 12 congenitally deaf signers and 13 hearing participants. In Experiment 1, we found a stronger activation during an action recognition task in comparison to a low-level visual control task in IFG, IPL and pMTG in both deaf signers and hearing individuals, but no effect of auditory or sign language experience. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of the first experiment using a passive viewing task. Together, our results provide robust evidence demonstrating that the response obtained in IFG, IPL, and pMTG during action recognition and passive viewing is not affected by auditory or sign language experience, adding further support for the supra-modal nature of these regions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4781852/ /pubmed/27014025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00094 Text en Copyright © 2016 Fang, Chen, Lingnau, Han and Bi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fang, Yuxing
Chen, Quanjing
Lingnau, Angelika
Han, Zaizhu
Bi, Yanchao
Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience
title Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience
title_full Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience
title_fullStr Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience
title_full_unstemmed Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience
title_short Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience
title_sort areas recruited during action understanding are not modulated by auditory or sign language experience
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00094
work_keys_str_mv AT fangyuxing areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience
AT chenquanjing areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience
AT lingnauangelika areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience
AT hanzaizhu areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience
AT biyanchao areasrecruitedduringactionunderstandingarenotmodulatedbyauditoryorsignlanguageexperience