Cargando…

Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Background. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) is a widely established scoring system that describes disease burden in isolated colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC). Its significance may be diminished with complete cytoreduction. We explore the utility of the recently described Peritoneal S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Jia Lin, Ong, Whee Sze, Chia, Claramae Shulyn, Tan, Grace Hwei Ching, Soo, Khee-Chee, Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2495131
_version_ 1782419866348683264
author Ng, Jia Lin
Ong, Whee Sze
Chia, Claramae Shulyn
Tan, Grace Hwei Ching
Soo, Khee-Chee
Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
author_facet Ng, Jia Lin
Ong, Whee Sze
Chia, Claramae Shulyn
Tan, Grace Hwei Ching
Soo, Khee-Chee
Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
author_sort Ng, Jia Lin
collection PubMed
description Background. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) is a widely established scoring system that describes disease burden in isolated colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC). Its significance may be diminished with complete cytoreduction. We explore the utility of the recently described Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) and compare its prognostic value against PCI. Methods. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and survival less than 18 months (18 MS). Results. Fifty patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for CPC from 2003 to 2014, with 98% achieving complete cytoreduction. Median OS was 28.8 months (95% CI, 18.0–39.1); median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.7–13.9). Univariate analysis showed that higher PCI was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03–1.20) and PFS (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.14). Conversely, PSDSS was not associated with either endpoint. Multivariate analysis showed that PCI, but not PSDSS, was predictive of OS and PFS. PCI was also able to discriminate survival outcomes better than PSDSS for both OS and PFS. There was no association between 18 MS and either score. Conclusion. PCI is superior to PSDSS in predicting OS and PFS and remains the prognostic score of choice in CPC patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4781959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47819592016-03-22 Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Ng, Jia Lin Ong, Whee Sze Chia, Claramae Shulyn Tan, Grace Hwei Ching Soo, Khee-Chee Teo, Melissa Ching Ching Int J Surg Oncol Research Article Background. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) is a widely established scoring system that describes disease burden in isolated colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC). Its significance may be diminished with complete cytoreduction. We explore the utility of the recently described Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) and compare its prognostic value against PCI. Methods. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and survival less than 18 months (18 MS). Results. Fifty patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for CPC from 2003 to 2014, with 98% achieving complete cytoreduction. Median OS was 28.8 months (95% CI, 18.0–39.1); median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.7–13.9). Univariate analysis showed that higher PCI was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03–1.20) and PFS (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.14). Conversely, PSDSS was not associated with either endpoint. Multivariate analysis showed that PCI, but not PSDSS, was predictive of OS and PFS. PCI was also able to discriminate survival outcomes better than PSDSS for both OS and PFS. There was no association between 18 MS and either score. Conclusion. PCI is superior to PSDSS in predicting OS and PFS and remains the prognostic score of choice in CPC patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4781959/ /pubmed/27006828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2495131 Text en Copyright © 2016 Jia Lin Ng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ng, Jia Lin
Ong, Whee Sze
Chia, Claramae Shulyn
Tan, Grace Hwei Ching
Soo, Khee-Chee
Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
title Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
title_full Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
title_fullStr Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
title_short Prognostic Relevance of the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score Compared to the Peritoneal Cancer Index for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
title_sort prognostic relevance of the peritoneal surface disease severity score compared to the peritoneal cancer index for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2495131
work_keys_str_mv AT ngjialin prognosticrelevanceoftheperitonealsurfacediseaseseverityscorecomparedtotheperitonealcancerindexforcolorectalperitonealcarcinomatosis
AT ongwheesze prognosticrelevanceoftheperitonealsurfacediseaseseverityscorecomparedtotheperitonealcancerindexforcolorectalperitonealcarcinomatosis
AT chiaclaramaeshulyn prognosticrelevanceoftheperitonealsurfacediseaseseverityscorecomparedtotheperitonealcancerindexforcolorectalperitonealcarcinomatosis
AT tangracehweiching prognosticrelevanceoftheperitonealsurfacediseaseseverityscorecomparedtotheperitonealcancerindexforcolorectalperitonealcarcinomatosis
AT sookheechee prognosticrelevanceoftheperitonealsurfacediseaseseverityscorecomparedtotheperitonealcancerindexforcolorectalperitonealcarcinomatosis
AT teomelissachingching prognosticrelevanceoftheperitonealsurfacediseaseseverityscorecomparedtotheperitonealcancerindexforcolorectalperitonealcarcinomatosis