Cargando…

Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND: Participation in cancer screening programmes might cause worries in the population outweighting the benefits of reduced mortality. The present study aimed to investigate possible psychological harm of participation in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot in Norway. METHODS: In a pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kirkøen, Benedicte, Berstad, Paula, Botteri, Edoardo, Åvitsland, Tone Lise, Ossum, Alvilde Maria, de Lange, Thomas, Hoff, Geir, Bernklev, Tomm
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:	Clinical Study
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26867161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.14

Ejemplares similares

Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants vs individuals not invited
por: Kirkøen, Benedicte, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Lifestyle predictors for non-participation and outcome in the second round of faecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening
por: Knudsen, Markus Dines, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Characteristics of nonparticipants in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial comparing sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical testing
por: Botteri, Edoardo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Lifestyle predictors for inconsistent participation to fecal based colorectal cancer screening
por: Knudsen, Markus Dines, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Lower participation among immigrants in colorectal cancer screening in Norway
por: Bhargava, Sameer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

First do not harm
por: Jamoulle, Marc
Publicado: (2015)

First, do no harm
por: Marler, Thomas E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

First do no harm
por: Huisman, Menno V., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Benefits and harms of mammography screening
por: Løberg, Magnus, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Exploring geographical differences in the incidence of colorectal cancer in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study: a population-based prospective study
por: Oyeyemi, Sunday Oluwafemi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

On language – first, do no harm
por: Schumann, Roman
Publicado: (2022)

Detection of cancers and advanced adenomas in asymptomatic participants in colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study
por: Schult, Anna Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in infants and children
por: Åvitsland, Tone Lise, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Associations of red and processed meat intake with screen-detected colorectal lesions
por: Kværner, Ane Sørlie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

COVID-19: First Do No Harm
por: Waterer, Grant W., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

No Harm Done? Psychological Assessment in the A&E Department of Patients Who Deliberately Harm Themselves
por: Head, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (1999)

Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease: Preventing Harm or Harming the Healthy?
por: Taal, Maarten W.
Publicado: (2012)

Mobbing as a source of psychological harm in workers
por: Grotto-de-Souza, Jenifer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

What is the harm in harmful conception? On threshold harms in non-identity cases
por: Williams, Nicola J., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

To Cause Harm and to be Harmed by Others: New Perspectives on Alcohol’s Harms to Others
por: Seid, Abdu K., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Do we harm others even if we don't need to?
por: Cacault, M. Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

To Do No Harm: DES and the Dilemmas of Modern Medicine
por: Arnold, Catharine A.
Publicado: (1985)

Blood transfusion and the lung: first do no harm?
por: Napolitano, Lena M
Publicado: (2011)

“First do no harm” and the importance of prediction in oncology
por: Characiejus, Dainius, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Protective Athletic Mouthguards: Do They Cause Harm?
por: Glass, Richard T., et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Diabetes Drug Therapy -- First Do No Harm
por: Curtiss, Frederic R., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Recent self-harm and psychological measures in the emergency department
por: Randall, Jason R., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Patients with first versus multiple episodes of self-harm: how do their profiles differ?
por: Golay, Philippe, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Public Awareness and Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Prevention: a Cross-Sectional Survey
por: Knudsen, Markus Dines, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cancer Screening, Effective or Harmful?
por: Esmaeil Akbari, Mohammad
Publicado: (2016)

Cancer Screening, Effective or Harmful?
por: Esmaeil Akbari, Mohammad
Publicado: (2016)

Long-term follow-up of colorectal cancer screening attendees identifies differences in Phascolarctobacterium spp. using 16S rRNA and metagenome sequencing
por: Bucher-Johannessen, Cecilie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Health-related Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a European-wide Population-based Cohort 10 Years After Diagnosis
por: Huppertz-Hauss, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Effectiveness, benefit harm and cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Austria
por: Jahn, Beate, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

To Do No Harm: A Journey Through Medical School
por: Chen, Fabian
Publicado: (1987)

Treating Critical Illness: The Importance of First Doing No Harm
por: Singer, Mervyn, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Procedures in pediatric primary care: first do no harm
por: Freed, Gary L.
Publicado: (2015)

Aiming for zero fluid accumulation: First, do no harm
por: Nieto, Orlando Ruben Pérez, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Futility in acute care surgery: first do no harm
por: Hornor, Melissa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

How do cancer screening guidelines trade off benefits versus harms and burdens of screening? A systematic survey
por: Zeng, Linan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_r68aufpi5cq6dbdl9i017ide7t