Cargando…

Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks

BACKGROUND: Observational data shows that postterm pregnancy (≥42 gestational weeks, GW) and late term pregnancy (≥41 GW), as compared to term pregnancy, is associated with an increased risk for adverse outcome for the mother and infant. Standard care in many countries is induction of labour at 42 G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elden, Helen, Hagberg, Henrik, Wessberg, Anna, Sengpiel, Verena, Herbst, Andreas, Bullarbo, Maria, Bergh, Christina, Bolin, Kristian, Malbasic, Snezana, Saltvedt, Sissel, Stephansson, Olof, Wikström, Anna-Karin, Ladfors, Lars, Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26951777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0836-9
_version_ 1782419922147606528
author Elden, Helen
Hagberg, Henrik
Wessberg, Anna
Sengpiel, Verena
Herbst, Andreas
Bullarbo, Maria
Bergh, Christina
Bolin, Kristian
Malbasic, Snezana
Saltvedt, Sissel
Stephansson, Olof
Wikström, Anna-Karin
Ladfors, Lars
Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
author_facet Elden, Helen
Hagberg, Henrik
Wessberg, Anna
Sengpiel, Verena
Herbst, Andreas
Bullarbo, Maria
Bergh, Christina
Bolin, Kristian
Malbasic, Snezana
Saltvedt, Sissel
Stephansson, Olof
Wikström, Anna-Karin
Ladfors, Lars
Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
author_sort Elden, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Observational data shows that postterm pregnancy (≥42 gestational weeks, GW) and late term pregnancy (≥41 GW), as compared to term pregnancy, is associated with an increased risk for adverse outcome for the mother and infant. Standard care in many countries is induction of labour at 42 GW. There is insufficient scientific support that induction of labour at 41 GW, as compared with expectant management and induction at 42 GW will reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity without an increase in operative deliveries, negative delivery experiences or higher costs. Large randomised studies are needed since important outcomes; such as perinatal mortality and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy are rare events. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 10 038 healthy women ≥18 years old with a normal live singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at 41 GW estimated with a first or second trimester ultrasound, who is able to understand oral and written information will be randomised to labour induction at 41 GW (early induction) or expectant management and induction at 42 GW (late induction). Women will be recruited at university clinics and county hospitals in Sweden comprising more than 65 000 deliveries per year. Primary outcome will be a composite of stillbirth, neonatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcomes will be other adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes, mode of delivery, women’s experience, cost effectiveness and infant morbidity up to 3 months of age. Data on background variables, obstetric and neonatal outcomes will be obtained from the Swedish Pregnancy Register and the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Data on women’s experiences will be collected by questionnaires after randomisation and 3 months after delivery. Primary analysis will be intention to treat. The statistician will be blinded to group and intervention. DISCUSSION: It is important to investigate if an intervention at 41 GW is superior to standard care in order to reduce death and lifelong disability for the children. The pregnant population, >41 GW, constitutes 15–20 % of all pregnancies and the results of the study will thus have a great impact. The use of registries for randomisation and collection of outcome data represents a unique and new study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN26113652 the 30(th) of March 2015 (DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN26113652).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4782290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47822902016-03-09 Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks Elden, Helen Hagberg, Henrik Wessberg, Anna Sengpiel, Verena Herbst, Andreas Bullarbo, Maria Bergh, Christina Bolin, Kristian Malbasic, Snezana Saltvedt, Sissel Stephansson, Olof Wikström, Anna-Karin Ladfors, Lars Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Observational data shows that postterm pregnancy (≥42 gestational weeks, GW) and late term pregnancy (≥41 GW), as compared to term pregnancy, is associated with an increased risk for adverse outcome for the mother and infant. Standard care in many countries is induction of labour at 42 GW. There is insufficient scientific support that induction of labour at 41 GW, as compared with expectant management and induction at 42 GW will reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity without an increase in operative deliveries, negative delivery experiences or higher costs. Large randomised studies are needed since important outcomes; such as perinatal mortality and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy are rare events. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 10 038 healthy women ≥18 years old with a normal live singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at 41 GW estimated with a first or second trimester ultrasound, who is able to understand oral and written information will be randomised to labour induction at 41 GW (early induction) or expectant management and induction at 42 GW (late induction). Women will be recruited at university clinics and county hospitals in Sweden comprising more than 65 000 deliveries per year. Primary outcome will be a composite of stillbirth, neonatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcomes will be other adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes, mode of delivery, women’s experience, cost effectiveness and infant morbidity up to 3 months of age. Data on background variables, obstetric and neonatal outcomes will be obtained from the Swedish Pregnancy Register and the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Data on women’s experiences will be collected by questionnaires after randomisation and 3 months after delivery. Primary analysis will be intention to treat. The statistician will be blinded to group and intervention. DISCUSSION: It is important to investigate if an intervention at 41 GW is superior to standard care in order to reduce death and lifelong disability for the children. The pregnant population, >41 GW, constitutes 15–20 % of all pregnancies and the results of the study will thus have a great impact. The use of registries for randomisation and collection of outcome data represents a unique and new study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN26113652 the 30(th) of March 2015 (DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN26113652). BioMed Central 2016-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4782290/ /pubmed/26951777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0836-9 Text en © Elden et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Elden, Helen
Hagberg, Henrik
Wessberg, Anna
Sengpiel, Verena
Herbst, Andreas
Bullarbo, Maria
Bergh, Christina
Bolin, Kristian
Malbasic, Snezana
Saltvedt, Sissel
Stephansson, Olof
Wikström, Anna-Karin
Ladfors, Lars
Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
title Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
title_full Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
title_fullStr Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
title_short Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
title_sort study protocol of swepis a swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26951777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0836-9
work_keys_str_mv AT eldenhelen studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT hagberghenrik studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT wessberganna studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT sengpielverena studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT herbstandreas studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT bullarbomaria studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT berghchristina studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT bolinkristian studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT malbasicsnezana studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT saltvedtsissel studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT stephanssonolof studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT wikstromannakarin studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT ladforslars studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks
AT wennerholmullabritt studyprotocolofswepisaswedishmulticentreregisterbasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialtocompareinductionoflabourat41completedgestationalweeksversusexpectantmanagementandinductionat42completedgestationalweeks