Cargando…

Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation

BACKGROUND: The shortage of suitable organs and achieved tolerance are uncontested main concerns in transplantation. Long waiting lists for deceased donors and limited numbers of living donors are the current scenarios. Kidney grafts from living donors have better overall survival compared to cadave...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vogiatzi, Paraskevi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26958340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13737-016-0032-5
_version_ 1782419925939257344
author Vogiatzi, Paraskevi
author_facet Vogiatzi, Paraskevi
author_sort Vogiatzi, Paraskevi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The shortage of suitable organs and achieved tolerance are uncontested main concerns in transplantation. Long waiting lists for deceased donors and limited numbers of living donors are the current scenarios. Kidney grafts from living donors have better overall survival compared to cadaveric and require less aggressive immunosuppressive regimens. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) labs have the key role to test the recipient and donors compatibility based on typing and antibody profile. The current standard molecular procedure in solid organ transplantation is low-resolution typing, at the antigen level. MAIN TEXT: In this commentary, the merits of high versus low degree of typing resolution in solid organ transplantation are discussed. Critical questions and reasons to bring high-resolution typing as a routine test in health system are considered. Specifically, with the introduction of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) in HLA, the pros and cons in living donation and benefits after deceased donation are critically evaluated. CONCLUSION: NGS has the potential to improve the transplant rates and the overall graft survival. Alternative strategies to increase in demanding the number of transplants are briefly highlighted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4782307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47823072016-03-09 Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation Vogiatzi, Paraskevi Transplant Res Commentary BACKGROUND: The shortage of suitable organs and achieved tolerance are uncontested main concerns in transplantation. Long waiting lists for deceased donors and limited numbers of living donors are the current scenarios. Kidney grafts from living donors have better overall survival compared to cadaveric and require less aggressive immunosuppressive regimens. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) labs have the key role to test the recipient and donors compatibility based on typing and antibody profile. The current standard molecular procedure in solid organ transplantation is low-resolution typing, at the antigen level. MAIN TEXT: In this commentary, the merits of high versus low degree of typing resolution in solid organ transplantation are discussed. Critical questions and reasons to bring high-resolution typing as a routine test in health system are considered. Specifically, with the introduction of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) in HLA, the pros and cons in living donation and benefits after deceased donation are critically evaluated. CONCLUSION: NGS has the potential to improve the transplant rates and the overall graft survival. Alternative strategies to increase in demanding the number of transplants are briefly highlighted. BioMed Central 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4782307/ /pubmed/26958340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13737-016-0032-5 Text en © Vogiatzi. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Vogiatzi, Paraskevi
Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation
title Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation
title_full Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation
title_fullStr Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation
title_short Some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation
title_sort some considerations on the current debate about typing resolution in solid organ transplantation
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26958340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13737-016-0032-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vogiatziparaskevi someconsiderationsonthecurrentdebateabouttypingresolutioninsolidorgantransplantation