Cargando…

Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, it has taken decades to introduce new interventions in low-income countries. Several factors account for these delays, one of which is the absence of a framework to facilitate comprehensive understanding of policy process to inform policy makers and stimulate the decision-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romore, Idda, Njau, Ritha J. A., Semali, Innocent, Mwisongo, Aziza, Ba Nguz, Antoinette, Mshinda, Hassan, Tanner, Marcel, Abdulla, Salim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26956944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1197-6
_version_ 1782419935649071104
author Romore, Idda
Njau, Ritha J. A.
Semali, Innocent
Mwisongo, Aziza
Ba Nguz, Antoinette
Mshinda, Hassan
Tanner, Marcel
Abdulla, Salim
author_facet Romore, Idda
Njau, Ritha J. A.
Semali, Innocent
Mwisongo, Aziza
Ba Nguz, Antoinette
Mshinda, Hassan
Tanner, Marcel
Abdulla, Salim
author_sort Romore, Idda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally, it has taken decades to introduce new interventions in low-income countries. Several factors account for these delays, one of which is the absence of a framework to facilitate comprehensive understanding of policy process to inform policy makers and stimulate the decision-making process. In the case of the proposed introduction of malaria vaccines in Tanzania, a specific framework for decision-making will speed up the administrative process and shorten the time until the vaccine is made available to the target population. METHODS: Qualitative research was used as a basis for developing the Policy Framework. Interviews were conducted with government officials, bilateral and multilateral partners and other stakeholders in Tanzania to assess malaria treatment policy changes and to draw lessons for malaria vaccine adoption. RESULTS: The decision-making process for adopting malaria interventions and new vaccines in general takes years, involving several processes: meetings and presentations of scientific data from different studies with consistent results, packaging and disseminating evidence and getting approval for use by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW). It is influenced by contextual factors; Promoting factors include; epidemiological and intervention characteristics, country experiences of malaria treatment policy change, presentation and dissemination of evidence, coordination and harmonization of the process, use of international scientific evidence. Barriers factors includes; financial sustainability, competing health and other priorities, political will and bureaucratic procedures, costs related to the adoption and implementations of interventions, supply and distribution and professional compliance with anti-malarial drugs. CONCLUSION: The framework facilitates the synthesis of information in a coherent way, enabling a clearer understanding of the policy process, thereby speeding up the policy decision-making process and shortening the time for a malaria vaccine to become available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4782348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47823482016-03-09 Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania Romore, Idda Njau, Ritha J. A. Semali, Innocent Mwisongo, Aziza Ba Nguz, Antoinette Mshinda, Hassan Tanner, Marcel Abdulla, Salim Malar J Case Study BACKGROUND: Traditionally, it has taken decades to introduce new interventions in low-income countries. Several factors account for these delays, one of which is the absence of a framework to facilitate comprehensive understanding of policy process to inform policy makers and stimulate the decision-making process. In the case of the proposed introduction of malaria vaccines in Tanzania, a specific framework for decision-making will speed up the administrative process and shorten the time until the vaccine is made available to the target population. METHODS: Qualitative research was used as a basis for developing the Policy Framework. Interviews were conducted with government officials, bilateral and multilateral partners and other stakeholders in Tanzania to assess malaria treatment policy changes and to draw lessons for malaria vaccine adoption. RESULTS: The decision-making process for adopting malaria interventions and new vaccines in general takes years, involving several processes: meetings and presentations of scientific data from different studies with consistent results, packaging and disseminating evidence and getting approval for use by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW). It is influenced by contextual factors; Promoting factors include; epidemiological and intervention characteristics, country experiences of malaria treatment policy change, presentation and dissemination of evidence, coordination and harmonization of the process, use of international scientific evidence. Barriers factors includes; financial sustainability, competing health and other priorities, political will and bureaucratic procedures, costs related to the adoption and implementations of interventions, supply and distribution and professional compliance with anti-malarial drugs. CONCLUSION: The framework facilitates the synthesis of information in a coherent way, enabling a clearer understanding of the policy process, thereby speeding up the policy decision-making process and shortening the time for a malaria vaccine to become available. BioMed Central 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4782348/ /pubmed/26956944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1197-6 Text en © Romore et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Study
Romore, Idda
Njau, Ritha J. A.
Semali, Innocent
Mwisongo, Aziza
Ba Nguz, Antoinette
Mshinda, Hassan
Tanner, Marcel
Abdulla, Salim
Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania
title Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania
title_full Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania
title_fullStr Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania
title_short Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania
title_sort policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine rts,s in tanzania
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26956944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1197-6
work_keys_str_mv AT romoreidda policyanalysisfordecidingonamalariavaccinertssintanzania
AT njaurithaja policyanalysisfordecidingonamalariavaccinertssintanzania
AT semaliinnocent policyanalysisfordecidingonamalariavaccinertssintanzania
AT mwisongoaziza policyanalysisfordecidingonamalariavaccinertssintanzania
AT banguzantoinette policyanalysisfordecidingonamalariavaccinertssintanzania
AT mshindahassan policyanalysisfordecidingonamalariavaccinertssintanzania
AT tannermarcel policyanalysisfordecidingonamalariavaccinertssintanzania
AT abdullasalim policyanalysisfordecidingonamalariavaccinertssintanzania