Cargando…

Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI

BACKGROUND: Few studies have been conducted that have compared electrical source localization (ESL) results obtained by analyzing ictal patterns in scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) with the brain areas that are found to be responsible for seizures using other brain imaging techniques. Additionally,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Akdeniz, Gülsüm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27011626
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.168632
_version_ 1782419982999617536
author Akdeniz, Gülsüm
author_facet Akdeniz, Gülsüm
author_sort Akdeniz, Gülsüm
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have been conducted that have compared electrical source localization (ESL) results obtained by analyzing ictal patterns in scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) with the brain areas that are found to be responsible for seizures using other brain imaging techniques. Additionally, adequate studies have not been performed to confirm the accuracy of ESL methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, ESL was conducted using LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography) in 9 patients with lesions apparent on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and in 6 patients who did not exhibit lesions on their MRIs. EEGs of patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy and had follow-ups for at least 1 year after operations were analyzed for ictal spike, rhythmic, paroxysmal fast, and obscured EEG activities. Epileptogenic zones identified in postoperative MRIs were then compared with localizations obtained by LORETA model we employed. RESULTS: We found that brain areas determined via ESL were in concordance with resected brain areas for 13 of the 15 patients evaluated, and those 13 patients were post-operatively determined as being seizure-free. CONCLUSION: ESL, which is a noninvasive technique, may contribute to the correct delineation of epileptogenic zones in patients who will eventually undergo surgery to treat epilepsy, (regardless of neuroimaging status). Moreover, ESL may aid in deciding on the number and localization of intracranial electrodes to be used in patients who are candidates for invasive recording.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4782550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47825502016-03-23 Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI Akdeniz, Gülsüm Ann Indian Acad Neurol Original Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have been conducted that have compared electrical source localization (ESL) results obtained by analyzing ictal patterns in scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) with the brain areas that are found to be responsible for seizures using other brain imaging techniques. Additionally, adequate studies have not been performed to confirm the accuracy of ESL methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, ESL was conducted using LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography) in 9 patients with lesions apparent on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and in 6 patients who did not exhibit lesions on their MRIs. EEGs of patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy and had follow-ups for at least 1 year after operations were analyzed for ictal spike, rhythmic, paroxysmal fast, and obscured EEG activities. Epileptogenic zones identified in postoperative MRIs were then compared with localizations obtained by LORETA model we employed. RESULTS: We found that brain areas determined via ESL were in concordance with resected brain areas for 13 of the 15 patients evaluated, and those 13 patients were post-operatively determined as being seizure-free. CONCLUSION: ESL, which is a noninvasive technique, may contribute to the correct delineation of epileptogenic zones in patients who will eventually undergo surgery to treat epilepsy, (regardless of neuroimaging status). Moreover, ESL may aid in deciding on the number and localization of intracranial electrodes to be used in patients who are candidates for invasive recording. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4782550/ /pubmed/27011626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.168632 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Akdeniz, Gülsüm
Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_full Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_fullStr Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_full_unstemmed Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_short Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI
title_sort electrical source localization by loreta in patients with epilepsy: confirmation by postoperative mri
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27011626
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.168632
work_keys_str_mv AT akdenizgulsum electricalsourcelocalizationbyloretainpatientswithepilepsyconfirmationbypostoperativemri