Cargando…

Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors

Concepts with implicit spatial meaning (e.g., "hat", "boots") can bias visual attention in space. This result is typically found in experiments with a single visual target per trial, which can appear at one of two locations (e.g., above vs. below). Furthermore, the interaction is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gozli, Davood G., Pratt, Jay, Martin, K. Zoë, Chasteen, Alison L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26953570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150928
_version_ 1782420050940002304
author Gozli, Davood G.
Pratt, Jay
Martin, K. Zoë
Chasteen, Alison L.
author_facet Gozli, Davood G.
Pratt, Jay
Martin, K. Zoë
Chasteen, Alison L.
author_sort Gozli, Davood G.
collection PubMed
description Concepts with implicit spatial meaning (e.g., "hat", "boots") can bias visual attention in space. This result is typically found in experiments with a single visual target per trial, which can appear at one of two locations (e.g., above vs. below). Furthermore, the interaction is typically found in the form of speeded responses to targets appearing at the compatible location (e.g., faster responses to a target above fixation, after reading "hat"). It has been argued that these concept-space interactions could also result from experimentally-induced associations between the binary set of locations and the conceptual categories with upward and downward meaning. Thus, rather than reflecting a conceptually driven spatial bias, the effect could reflect a benefit for compatible cue-target sequences that occurs only after target onset. We addressed these concerns by going beyond a binary set of locations and employing a search display consisting of four items (above, below, left, and right). Within each search trial, before performing a visual search task, participants performed a conceptual task involving concepts with implicit upward or downward meaning. The search display, in addition to including a target, could also include a salient distractor. Assuming a conceptually driven visual bias, we expected to observe, first, a benefit for target processing at the compatible location and, second, an increase in the cost of the salient distractor. The findings confirmed both predictions, suggesting that concepts do indeed generate a spatial bias. Finally, results from a control experiment, without the conceptual task, suggest the presence of an axis-specific effect, in addition to the location-specific effect, suggesting that concepts might cause both location-specific and axis-specific spatial bias. Taken together, our findings provide additional support for the involvement of spatial processing in conceptual understanding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4783007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47830072016-03-23 Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors Gozli, Davood G. Pratt, Jay Martin, K. Zoë Chasteen, Alison L. PLoS One Research Article Concepts with implicit spatial meaning (e.g., "hat", "boots") can bias visual attention in space. This result is typically found in experiments with a single visual target per trial, which can appear at one of two locations (e.g., above vs. below). Furthermore, the interaction is typically found in the form of speeded responses to targets appearing at the compatible location (e.g., faster responses to a target above fixation, after reading "hat"). It has been argued that these concept-space interactions could also result from experimentally-induced associations between the binary set of locations and the conceptual categories with upward and downward meaning. Thus, rather than reflecting a conceptually driven spatial bias, the effect could reflect a benefit for compatible cue-target sequences that occurs only after target onset. We addressed these concerns by going beyond a binary set of locations and employing a search display consisting of four items (above, below, left, and right). Within each search trial, before performing a visual search task, participants performed a conceptual task involving concepts with implicit upward or downward meaning. The search display, in addition to including a target, could also include a salient distractor. Assuming a conceptually driven visual bias, we expected to observe, first, a benefit for target processing at the compatible location and, second, an increase in the cost of the salient distractor. The findings confirmed both predictions, suggesting that concepts do indeed generate a spatial bias. Finally, results from a control experiment, without the conceptual task, suggest the presence of an axis-specific effect, in addition to the location-specific effect, suggesting that concepts might cause both location-specific and axis-specific spatial bias. Taken together, our findings provide additional support for the involvement of spatial processing in conceptual understanding. Public Library of Science 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4783007/ /pubmed/26953570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150928 Text en © 2016 Gozli et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gozli, Davood G.
Pratt, Jay
Martin, K. Zoë
Chasteen, Alison L.
Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors
title Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors
title_full Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors
title_fullStr Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors
title_full_unstemmed Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors
title_short Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors
title_sort implied spatial meaning and visuospatial bias: conceptual processing influences processing of visual targets and distractors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26953570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150928
work_keys_str_mv AT gozlidavoodg impliedspatialmeaningandvisuospatialbiasconceptualprocessinginfluencesprocessingofvisualtargetsanddistractors
AT prattjay impliedspatialmeaningandvisuospatialbiasconceptualprocessinginfluencesprocessingofvisualtargetsanddistractors
AT martinkzoe impliedspatialmeaningandvisuospatialbiasconceptualprocessinginfluencesprocessingofvisualtargetsanddistractors
AT chasteenalisonl impliedspatialmeaningandvisuospatialbiasconceptualprocessinginfluencesprocessingofvisualtargetsanddistractors