Cargando…

Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies

BACKGROUND: Several reviews on the accuracy of Tuberculosis (TB) Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) have been performed but the evidence on their impact on patient-important outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. Given the recent increase in research evaluating such outcomes and the gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schumacher, Samuel G., Sohn, Hojoon, Qin, Zhi Zhen, Gore, Genevieve, Davis, J. Lucian, Denkinger, Claudia M., Pai, Madhukar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151073
_version_ 1782420062291886080
author Schumacher, Samuel G.
Sohn, Hojoon
Qin, Zhi Zhen
Gore, Genevieve
Davis, J. Lucian
Denkinger, Claudia M.
Pai, Madhukar
author_facet Schumacher, Samuel G.
Sohn, Hojoon
Qin, Zhi Zhen
Gore, Genevieve
Davis, J. Lucian
Denkinger, Claudia M.
Pai, Madhukar
author_sort Schumacher, Samuel G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several reviews on the accuracy of Tuberculosis (TB) Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) have been performed but the evidence on their impact on patient-important outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. Given the recent increase in research evaluating such outcomes and the growing list of TB NAATs that will reach the market over the coming years, there is a need to bring together the existing evidence on impact, rather than accuracy. We aimed to assess the approaches that have been employed to measure the impact of TB NAATs on patient-important outcomes in adults with possible pulmonary TB and/or drug-resistant TB. METHODS: We first develop a conceptual framework to clarify through which mechanisms the improved technical performance of a novel TB test may lead to improved patient outcomes and outline which designs may be used to measure them. We then systematically review the literature on studies attempting to assess the impact of molecular TB diagnostics on such outcomes and provide a narrative synthesis of designs used, outcomes assessed and risk of bias across different study designs. RESULTS: We found 25 eligible studies that assessed a wide range of outcomes and utilized a variety of experimental and observational study designs. Many potentially strong design options have never been used. We found that much of the available evidence on patient-important outcomes comes from a small number of settings with particular epidemiological and operational context and that confounding, time trends and incomplete outcome data receive insufficient attention. CONCLUSIONS: A broader range of designs should be considered when designing studies to assess the impact of TB diagnostics on patient outcomes and more attention needs to be paid to the analysis as concerns about confounding and selection bias become relevant in addition to those on measurement that are of greatest concern in accuracy studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4783056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47830562016-03-23 Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies Schumacher, Samuel G. Sohn, Hojoon Qin, Zhi Zhen Gore, Genevieve Davis, J. Lucian Denkinger, Claudia M. Pai, Madhukar PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Several reviews on the accuracy of Tuberculosis (TB) Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) have been performed but the evidence on their impact on patient-important outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. Given the recent increase in research evaluating such outcomes and the growing list of TB NAATs that will reach the market over the coming years, there is a need to bring together the existing evidence on impact, rather than accuracy. We aimed to assess the approaches that have been employed to measure the impact of TB NAATs on patient-important outcomes in adults with possible pulmonary TB and/or drug-resistant TB. METHODS: We first develop a conceptual framework to clarify through which mechanisms the improved technical performance of a novel TB test may lead to improved patient outcomes and outline which designs may be used to measure them. We then systematically review the literature on studies attempting to assess the impact of molecular TB diagnostics on such outcomes and provide a narrative synthesis of designs used, outcomes assessed and risk of bias across different study designs. RESULTS: We found 25 eligible studies that assessed a wide range of outcomes and utilized a variety of experimental and observational study designs. Many potentially strong design options have never been used. We found that much of the available evidence on patient-important outcomes comes from a small number of settings with particular epidemiological and operational context and that confounding, time trends and incomplete outcome data receive insufficient attention. CONCLUSIONS: A broader range of designs should be considered when designing studies to assess the impact of TB diagnostics on patient outcomes and more attention needs to be paid to the analysis as concerns about confounding and selection bias become relevant in addition to those on measurement that are of greatest concern in accuracy studies. Public Library of Science 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4783056/ /pubmed/26954678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151073 Text en © 2016 Schumacher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schumacher, Samuel G.
Sohn, Hojoon
Qin, Zhi Zhen
Gore, Genevieve
Davis, J. Lucian
Denkinger, Claudia M.
Pai, Madhukar
Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies
title Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies
title_full Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies
title_fullStr Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies
title_short Impact of Molecular Diagnostics for Tuberculosis on Patient-Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Study Methodologies
title_sort impact of molecular diagnostics for tuberculosis on patient-important outcomes: a systematic review of study methodologies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151073
work_keys_str_mv AT schumachersamuelg impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT sohnhojoon impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT qinzhizhen impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT goregenevieve impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT davisjlucian impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT denkingerclaudiam impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies
AT paimadhukar impactofmoleculardiagnosticsfortuberculosisonpatientimportantoutcomesasystematicreviewofstudymethodologies