Cargando…

Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations

Reliable and accurate reference intervals (RIs) for laboratory analyses are an integral part of the process of correct interpretation of clinical laboratory test results. RIs given in laboratory reports have an important role in aiding the clinician in interpreting test results in reference to value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ozarda, Yesim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981015
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.001
_version_ 1782420070011502592
author Ozarda, Yesim
author_facet Ozarda, Yesim
author_sort Ozarda, Yesim
collection PubMed
description Reliable and accurate reference intervals (RIs) for laboratory analyses are an integral part of the process of correct interpretation of clinical laboratory test results. RIs given in laboratory reports have an important role in aiding the clinician in interpreting test results in reference to values for healthy populations. Since the 1980s, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) has been proactive in establishing recommendations to clarify the true significance of the term ‘RIs, to select the appropriate reference population and statistically analyse the data. The C28-A3 guideline published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and IFCC is still the most widely-used source of reference in this area. In recent years, protocols additional to the Guideline have been published by the IFCC, Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL), including all details of multicenter studies on RIs to meet the requirements in this area. Multicentric RIs studies are the most important development in the area of RIs. Recently, the C-RIDL has performed many multicentric studies to obtain common RIs. Confusion of RIs and clinical decision limits (CDLs) remains an issue and pediatric and geriatric age groups are a significant problem. For future studies of RIs, the genetic effect would seem to be the most challenging area.
The aim of the review is to present the current theory and practice of RIs, with special emphasis given to multicenter RIs studies, RIs studies for pediatric and geriatric age groups, clinical decision limits and partitioning by genetic effects on RIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4783089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47830892016-03-15 Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations Ozarda, Yesim Biochem Med (Zagreb) Review Article Reliable and accurate reference intervals (RIs) for laboratory analyses are an integral part of the process of correct interpretation of clinical laboratory test results. RIs given in laboratory reports have an important role in aiding the clinician in interpreting test results in reference to values for healthy populations. Since the 1980s, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) has been proactive in establishing recommendations to clarify the true significance of the term ‘RIs, to select the appropriate reference population and statistically analyse the data. The C28-A3 guideline published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and IFCC is still the most widely-used source of reference in this area. In recent years, protocols additional to the Guideline have been published by the IFCC, Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL), including all details of multicenter studies on RIs to meet the requirements in this area. Multicentric RIs studies are the most important development in the area of RIs. Recently, the C-RIDL has performed many multicentric studies to obtain common RIs. Confusion of RIs and clinical decision limits (CDLs) remains an issue and pediatric and geriatric age groups are a significant problem. For future studies of RIs, the genetic effect would seem to be the most challenging area.
The aim of the review is to present the current theory and practice of RIs, with special emphasis given to multicenter RIs studies, RIs studies for pediatric and geriatric age groups, clinical decision limits and partitioning by genetic effects on RIs. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2016-02-15 2016-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4783089/ /pubmed/26981015 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.001 Text en
spellingShingle Review Article
Ozarda, Yesim
Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
title Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
title_full Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
title_fullStr Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
title_full_unstemmed Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
title_short Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
title_sort reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26981015
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.001
work_keys_str_mv AT ozardayesim referenceintervalscurrentstatusrecentdevelopmentsandfutureconsiderations