Cargando…

Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was the development of a semi-quantitative real-time PCR to detect uropathogens. Two multiplex PCR reactions were designed to detect Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Zee, Anneke, Roorda, Lieuwe, Bosman, Gerda, Ossewaarde, Jacobus M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150755
_version_ 1782420079656304640
author van der Zee, Anneke
Roorda, Lieuwe
Bosman, Gerda
Ossewaarde, Jacobus M.
author_facet van der Zee, Anneke
Roorda, Lieuwe
Bosman, Gerda
Ossewaarde, Jacobus M.
author_sort van der Zee, Anneke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was the development of a semi-quantitative real-time PCR to detect uropathogens. Two multiplex PCR reactions were designed to detect Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 16S based PCR was performed in parallel to detect Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Firstly to identify non-targeted agents of infection in the same urine specimen, and secondly to quantify background flora. The method was evaluated in comparison with standard bacterial culture, and a commercial PCR kit for detection of uropathogens. FINDINGS: Analysis with a known panel of 116 clinical isolates yielded a PCR specificity of 100%. Analysis of urine specimens from 211 patients revealed a high correlation of PCR Cq values with both culture positivity and quantity. Concordance between PCR and culture was 98% when both methods yielded results. PCR was found to be more sensitive than culture. With a cut-off Cq value of 33, the negative predictive value of PCR was 94%. The 16S PCR confirmed most results. One specimen was positive by 16S PCR suggesting another cause of infection not detected by the specific PCR assays. CONCLUSION: We conclude that it is feasible to detect and identify uropathogens by multiplex real-time PCR assay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4783162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47831622016-03-23 Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting van der Zee, Anneke Roorda, Lieuwe Bosman, Gerda Ossewaarde, Jacobus M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was the development of a semi-quantitative real-time PCR to detect uropathogens. Two multiplex PCR reactions were designed to detect Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 16S based PCR was performed in parallel to detect Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Firstly to identify non-targeted agents of infection in the same urine specimen, and secondly to quantify background flora. The method was evaluated in comparison with standard bacterial culture, and a commercial PCR kit for detection of uropathogens. FINDINGS: Analysis with a known panel of 116 clinical isolates yielded a PCR specificity of 100%. Analysis of urine specimens from 211 patients revealed a high correlation of PCR Cq values with both culture positivity and quantity. Concordance between PCR and culture was 98% when both methods yielded results. PCR was found to be more sensitive than culture. With a cut-off Cq value of 33, the negative predictive value of PCR was 94%. The 16S PCR confirmed most results. One specimen was positive by 16S PCR suggesting another cause of infection not detected by the specific PCR assays. CONCLUSION: We conclude that it is feasible to detect and identify uropathogens by multiplex real-time PCR assay. Public Library of Science 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4783162/ /pubmed/26954694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150755 Text en © 2016 van der Zee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Zee, Anneke
Roorda, Lieuwe
Bosman, Gerda
Ossewaarde, Jacobus M.
Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting
title Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting
title_full Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting
title_fullStr Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting
title_short Molecular Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections by Semi-Quantitative Detection of Uropathogens in a Routine Clinical Hospital Setting
title_sort molecular diagnosis of urinary tract infections by semi-quantitative detection of uropathogens in a routine clinical hospital setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150755
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderzeeanneke moleculardiagnosisofurinarytractinfectionsbysemiquantitativedetectionofuropathogensinaroutineclinicalhospitalsetting
AT roordalieuwe moleculardiagnosisofurinarytractinfectionsbysemiquantitativedetectionofuropathogensinaroutineclinicalhospitalsetting
AT bosmangerda moleculardiagnosisofurinarytractinfectionsbysemiquantitativedetectionofuropathogensinaroutineclinicalhospitalsetting
AT ossewaardejacobusm moleculardiagnosisofurinarytractinfectionsbysemiquantitativedetectionofuropathogensinaroutineclinicalhospitalsetting