Cargando…

The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells

BACKGROUND: We have previously found that CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) can adoptively transfer tolerance after its induction with costimulatory blockade in a mouse model of murine cardiac allograft transplantation. In these experiments, we tested an hypothesis with three components: (1)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Toshiro, Yamada, Akira, Batal, Ibrahim, Yeung, Melissa Y., McGrath, Martina M., Sayegh, Mohamed H., Chandraker, Anil, Ueno, Takuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014262
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00082
_version_ 1782420101642846208
author Ito, Toshiro
Yamada, Akira
Batal, Ibrahim
Yeung, Melissa Y.
McGrath, Martina M.
Sayegh, Mohamed H.
Chandraker, Anil
Ueno, Takuya
author_facet Ito, Toshiro
Yamada, Akira
Batal, Ibrahim
Yeung, Melissa Y.
McGrath, Martina M.
Sayegh, Mohamed H.
Chandraker, Anil
Ueno, Takuya
author_sort Ito, Toshiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We have previously found that CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) can adoptively transfer tolerance after its induction with costimulatory blockade in a mouse model of murine cardiac allograft transplantation. In these experiments, we tested an hypothesis with three components: (1) the Tregs that transfer tolerance have the capacity for linked suppression, (2) the determinants that stimulate the Tregs are expressed by the indirect pathway, and (3) the donor peptides contributing to these indirect determinants are derived from donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens (Ags). METHODS: First heart transplants were performed from the indicated donor strain to B10.D2 recipients along with costimulatory blockade treatment (250 μg i.p. injection of MR1 on day 0 and 250 μg i.p. injection of CTLA-4 Ig on day 2). At least 8 weeks later, a second heart transplant was performed to a new B10.D2 recipient who had been irradiated with 450 cGy. This recipient was given 40 × 106 naive B10.D2 spleen cells + 40 × 106 B10.D2 spleen cells from the first (tolerant) recipient. We performed three different types of heart transplants using various donors. RESULTS: (1) Tregs suppress the graft rejection in an Ag-specific manner. (2) Tregs generated in the face of MHC disparities suppress the rejection of grafts expressing third party MHC along with tolerant MHC. CONCLUSION: The limits of linkage appear to be quantitative and not universally determined by either the indirect pathway or by peptides of donor MHC Ags.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4783400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47834002016-03-24 The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells Ito, Toshiro Yamada, Akira Batal, Ibrahim Yeung, Melissa Y. McGrath, Martina M. Sayegh, Mohamed H. Chandraker, Anil Ueno, Takuya Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: We have previously found that CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) can adoptively transfer tolerance after its induction with costimulatory blockade in a mouse model of murine cardiac allograft transplantation. In these experiments, we tested an hypothesis with three components: (1) the Tregs that transfer tolerance have the capacity for linked suppression, (2) the determinants that stimulate the Tregs are expressed by the indirect pathway, and (3) the donor peptides contributing to these indirect determinants are derived from donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens (Ags). METHODS: First heart transplants were performed from the indicated donor strain to B10.D2 recipients along with costimulatory blockade treatment (250 μg i.p. injection of MR1 on day 0 and 250 μg i.p. injection of CTLA-4 Ig on day 2). At least 8 weeks later, a second heart transplant was performed to a new B10.D2 recipient who had been irradiated with 450 cGy. This recipient was given 40 × 106 naive B10.D2 spleen cells + 40 × 106 B10.D2 spleen cells from the first (tolerant) recipient. We performed three different types of heart transplants using various donors. RESULTS: (1) Tregs suppress the graft rejection in an Ag-specific manner. (2) Tregs generated in the face of MHC disparities suppress the rejection of grafts expressing third party MHC along with tolerant MHC. CONCLUSION: The limits of linkage appear to be quantitative and not universally determined by either the indirect pathway or by peptides of donor MHC Ags. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4783400/ /pubmed/27014262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00082 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ito, Yamada, Batal, Yeung, McGrath, Sayegh, Chandraker and Ueno. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Ito, Toshiro
Yamada, Akira
Batal, Ibrahim
Yeung, Melissa Y.
McGrath, Martina M.
Sayegh, Mohamed H.
Chandraker, Anil
Ueno, Takuya
The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells
title The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells
title_full The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells
title_fullStr The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells
title_full_unstemmed The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells
title_short The Limits of Linked Suppression for Regulatory T Cells
title_sort limits of linked suppression for regulatory t cells
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27014262
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00082
work_keys_str_mv AT itotoshiro thelimitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT yamadaakira thelimitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT batalibrahim thelimitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT yeungmelissay thelimitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT mcgrathmartinam thelimitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT sayeghmohamedh thelimitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT chandrakeranil thelimitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT uenotakuya thelimitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT itotoshiro limitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT yamadaakira limitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT batalibrahim limitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT yeungmelissay limitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT mcgrathmartinam limitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT sayeghmohamedh limitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT chandrakeranil limitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells
AT uenotakuya limitsoflinkedsuppressionforregulatorytcells