Cargando…

Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Colorectal cancer (CRC) forms an important public health problem, especially in developed countries. CRC screening tests can be used to identify asymptomatic individuals with CRC precursors and (early) cancer. Removal of these lesions reduces CRC incidence and prevents CRC-related mortality. There a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreuders, Eline H., Grobbee, Esmée J., Spaander, Manon C. W., Kuipers, Ernst J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-016-0076-0
_version_ 1782420109211467776
author Schreuders, Eline H.
Grobbee, Esmée J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
author_facet Schreuders, Eline H.
Grobbee, Esmée J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
author_sort Schreuders, Eline H.
collection PubMed
description Colorectal cancer (CRC) forms an important public health problem, especially in developed countries. CRC screening tests can be used to identify asymptomatic individuals with CRC precursors and (early) cancer. Removal of these lesions reduces CRC incidence and prevents CRC-related mortality. There are a range of screening tests available, each with advantages and disadvantages. Stool screening tests can broadly be divided into fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) and molecular biomarker test, such as DNA/RNA marker tests, protein markers, and fecal microbiome marker tests. Guaiac fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) have been demonstrated in large randomized screening trials to reduce CRC mortality. Fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) have superior adherence, usability, and accuracy as compared to gFOBT. Advantage of the use of quantitative FITs in CRC screening programs is the cut-off level that can be adjusted. Molecular biomarker DNA tests have shown to detect significantly more cancers than FIT. By combining biomarker DNA tests with FIT, sensitivity for advanced adenomas can be increased significantly. However, it has lower specificity thus demands more colonoscopy resources, is more cumbersome, and costly. The adherence has not been assessed in population screening trials. For these reasons, FIT is therefore at present regarded as the preferred method of non-invasive CRC screening. This chapter will review the current status of fecal test-based CRC screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4783443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47834432016-03-22 Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening Schreuders, Eline H. Grobbee, Esmée J. Spaander, Manon C. W. Kuipers, Ernst J. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol Colon (C Kahi, Section Editor) Colorectal cancer (CRC) forms an important public health problem, especially in developed countries. CRC screening tests can be used to identify asymptomatic individuals with CRC precursors and (early) cancer. Removal of these lesions reduces CRC incidence and prevents CRC-related mortality. There are a range of screening tests available, each with advantages and disadvantages. Stool screening tests can broadly be divided into fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) and molecular biomarker test, such as DNA/RNA marker tests, protein markers, and fecal microbiome marker tests. Guaiac fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) have been demonstrated in large randomized screening trials to reduce CRC mortality. Fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) have superior adherence, usability, and accuracy as compared to gFOBT. Advantage of the use of quantitative FITs in CRC screening programs is the cut-off level that can be adjusted. Molecular biomarker DNA tests have shown to detect significantly more cancers than FIT. By combining biomarker DNA tests with FIT, sensitivity for advanced adenomas can be increased significantly. However, it has lower specificity thus demands more colonoscopy resources, is more cumbersome, and costly. The adherence has not been assessed in population screening trials. For these reasons, FIT is therefore at present regarded as the preferred method of non-invasive CRC screening. This chapter will review the current status of fecal test-based CRC screening. Springer US 2016-01-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4783443/ /pubmed/26825703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-016-0076-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Colon (C Kahi, Section Editor)
Schreuders, Eline H.
Grobbee, Esmée J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening
title Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_full Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_fullStr Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_short Advances in Fecal Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_sort advances in fecal tests for colorectal cancer screening
topic Colon (C Kahi, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11938-016-0076-0
work_keys_str_mv AT schreuderselineh advancesinfecaltestsforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT grobbeeesmeej advancesinfecaltestsforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT spaandermanoncw advancesinfecaltestsforcolorectalcancerscreening
AT kuipersernstj advancesinfecaltestsforcolorectalcancerscreening