Cargando…

Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To determine whether feeding infants with hydrolysed formula reduces their risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis, as part of a series of systematic reviews commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency to inform guidelines on infant feeding. Two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyle, Robert J, Ierodiakonou, Despo, Khan, Tasnia, Chivinge, Jennifer, Robinson, Zoe, Geoghegan, Natalie, Jarrold, Katharine, Afxentiou, Thalia, Reeves, Tim, Cunha, Sergio, Trivella, Marialena, Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa, Leonardi-Bee, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26956579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i974
_version_ 1782420120569643008
author Boyle, Robert J
Ierodiakonou, Despo
Khan, Tasnia
Chivinge, Jennifer
Robinson, Zoe
Geoghegan, Natalie
Jarrold, Katharine
Afxentiou, Thalia
Reeves, Tim
Cunha, Sergio
Trivella, Marialena
Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
author_facet Boyle, Robert J
Ierodiakonou, Despo
Khan, Tasnia
Chivinge, Jennifer
Robinson, Zoe
Geoghegan, Natalie
Jarrold, Katharine
Afxentiou, Thalia
Reeves, Tim
Cunha, Sergio
Trivella, Marialena
Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
author_sort Boyle, Robert J
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine whether feeding infants with hydrolysed formula reduces their risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis, as part of a series of systematic reviews commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency to inform guidelines on infant feeding. Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data sources Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and LILACS searched between January 1946 and April 2015. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective intervention trials of hydrolysed cows’ milk formula compared with another hydrolysed formula, human breast milk, or a standard cows’ milk formula, which reported on allergic or autoimmune disease or allergic sensitisation. Results 37 eligible intervention trials of hydrolysed formula were identified, including over 19 000 participants. There was evidence of conflict of interest and high or unclear risk of bias in most studies of allergic outcomes and evidence of publication bias for studies of eczema and wheeze. Overall there was no consistent evidence that partially or extensively hydrolysed formulas reduce risk of allergic or autoimmune outcomes in infants at high pre-existing risk of these outcomes. Odds ratios for eczema at age 0-4, compared with standard cows’ milk formula, were 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.07; I(2)=30%) for partially hydrolysed formula; 0.55 (0.28 to 1.09; I(2)=74%) for extensively hydrolysed casein based formula; and 1.12 (0.88 to 1.42; I(2)=0%) for extensively hydrolysed whey based formula. There was no evidence to support the health claim approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that a partially hydrolysed formula could reduce the risk of eczema nor the conclusion of the Cochrane review that hydrolysed formula could prevent allergy to cows’ milk. Conclusion These findings do not support current guidelines that recommend the use of hydrolysed formula to prevent allergic disease in high risk infants. Review registration PROSPERO CRD42013004252.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4783517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47835172016-03-10 Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis Boyle, Robert J Ierodiakonou, Despo Khan, Tasnia Chivinge, Jennifer Robinson, Zoe Geoghegan, Natalie Jarrold, Katharine Afxentiou, Thalia Reeves, Tim Cunha, Sergio Trivella, Marialena Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa Leonardi-Bee, Jo BMJ Research Objective To determine whether feeding infants with hydrolysed formula reduces their risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis, as part of a series of systematic reviews commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency to inform guidelines on infant feeding. Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data sources Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and LILACS searched between January 1946 and April 2015. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective intervention trials of hydrolysed cows’ milk formula compared with another hydrolysed formula, human breast milk, or a standard cows’ milk formula, which reported on allergic or autoimmune disease or allergic sensitisation. Results 37 eligible intervention trials of hydrolysed formula were identified, including over 19 000 participants. There was evidence of conflict of interest and high or unclear risk of bias in most studies of allergic outcomes and evidence of publication bias for studies of eczema and wheeze. Overall there was no consistent evidence that partially or extensively hydrolysed formulas reduce risk of allergic or autoimmune outcomes in infants at high pre-existing risk of these outcomes. Odds ratios for eczema at age 0-4, compared with standard cows’ milk formula, were 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.07; I(2)=30%) for partially hydrolysed formula; 0.55 (0.28 to 1.09; I(2)=74%) for extensively hydrolysed casein based formula; and 1.12 (0.88 to 1.42; I(2)=0%) for extensively hydrolysed whey based formula. There was no evidence to support the health claim approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that a partially hydrolysed formula could reduce the risk of eczema nor the conclusion of the Cochrane review that hydrolysed formula could prevent allergy to cows’ milk. Conclusion These findings do not support current guidelines that recommend the use of hydrolysed formula to prevent allergic disease in high risk infants. Review registration PROSPERO CRD42013004252. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4783517/ /pubmed/26956579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i974 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Boyle, Robert J
Ierodiakonou, Despo
Khan, Tasnia
Chivinge, Jennifer
Robinson, Zoe
Geoghegan, Natalie
Jarrold, Katharine
Afxentiou, Thalia
Reeves, Tim
Cunha, Sergio
Trivella, Marialena
Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa
Leonardi-Bee, Jo
Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort hydrolysed formula and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26956579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i974
work_keys_str_mv AT boylerobertj hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ierodiakonoudespo hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khantasnia hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chivingejennifer hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robinsonzoe hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT geoghegannatalie hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jarroldkatharine hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT afxentiouthalia hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reevestim hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cunhasergio hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trivellamarialena hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT garcialarsenvanessa hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leonardibeejo hydrolysedformulaandriskofallergicorautoimmunediseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis