Cargando…

Comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Myoclonus is a major side-effect following etomidate injection requiring use of medical intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 50 consecutive patients, randomly received sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg or midazolam 0.015 mg/kg, 90 s before induction of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alipour, Mohammad, Tabari, Masoumeh, Azad, Azadeh Mokhtari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006537
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.173382
_version_ 1782420227619815424
author Alipour, Mohammad
Tabari, Masoumeh
Azad, Azadeh Mokhtari
author_facet Alipour, Mohammad
Tabari, Masoumeh
Azad, Azadeh Mokhtari
author_sort Alipour, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Myoclonus is a major side-effect following etomidate injection requiring use of medical intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 50 consecutive patients, randomly received sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg or midazolam 0.015 mg/kg, 90 s before induction of anesthesia with etomidate (0.3 mg/kg). Then, the patients were monitored for any myoclonic movements during anesthesia. RESULTS: The incidence of myoclonus was 28% in the sufentanil group and 84% in the midazolam group. The frequency and intensity of myoclonus were significantly higher in the midazolam group, compared to the sufentanil group (P < 0.001). Myoclonus duration in the sufentanil and midazolam groups were 5.8 ± 13.2 and 69 ± 47.8 s, respectively (P < 0.0010). CONCLUSION: The frequency, intensity and duration of myoclonus in the midazolam group, were significantly more prevalent than the sufentanil group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4784209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47842092016-03-22 Comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate Alipour, Mohammad Tabari, Masoumeh Azad, Azadeh Mokhtari J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Myoclonus is a major side-effect following etomidate injection requiring use of medical intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 50 consecutive patients, randomly received sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg or midazolam 0.015 mg/kg, 90 s before induction of anesthesia with etomidate (0.3 mg/kg). Then, the patients were monitored for any myoclonic movements during anesthesia. RESULTS: The incidence of myoclonus was 28% in the sufentanil group and 84% in the midazolam group. The frequency and intensity of myoclonus were significantly higher in the midazolam group, compared to the sufentanil group (P < 0.001). Myoclonus duration in the sufentanil and midazolam groups were 5.8 ± 13.2 and 69 ± 47.8 s, respectively (P < 0.0010). CONCLUSION: The frequency, intensity and duration of myoclonus in the midazolam group, were significantly more prevalent than the sufentanil group. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4784209/ /pubmed/27006537 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.173382 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alipour, Mohammad
Tabari, Masoumeh
Azad, Azadeh Mokhtari
Comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate
title Comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate
title_full Comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate
title_fullStr Comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate
title_short Comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate
title_sort comparative study evaluating efficacy of sufentanil versus midazolam in preventing myoclonic movements following etomidate
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006537
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.173382
work_keys_str_mv AT alipourmohammad comparativestudyevaluatingefficacyofsufentanilversusmidazolaminpreventingmyoclonicmovementsfollowingetomidate
AT tabarimasoumeh comparativestudyevaluatingefficacyofsufentanilversusmidazolaminpreventingmyoclonicmovementsfollowingetomidate
AT azadazadehmokhtari comparativestudyevaluatingefficacyofsufentanilversusmidazolaminpreventingmyoclonicmovementsfollowingetomidate