Cargando…
Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The technique of securing the epidural catheter has a major bearing on the efficacy of epidural analgesia. Specific fixator devices, for e.g., Lockit epidural catheter clamp, which successfully prevents catheter migration, are available. The possibility of catheter snapping and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175667 |
_version_ | 1782420229398200320 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Ashima Parasa, Sujay Kumar Tejvath, Kiran Ramachandran, Gopinath |
author_facet | Sharma, Ashima Parasa, Sujay Kumar Tejvath, Kiran Ramachandran, Gopinath |
author_sort | Sharma, Ashima |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The technique of securing the epidural catheter has a major bearing on the efficacy of epidural analgesia. Specific fixator devices, for e.g., Lockit epidural catheter clamp, which successfully prevents catheter migration, are available. The possibility of catheter snapping and surgical retrieval has been reported with tunneling of catheters. These techniques have not been compared for safety, efficacy and appropriateness of achieving secure epidural catheter fixation in the postoperative period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients who required postoperative epidural analgesia were included. They were randomized into two groups: Group I (n = 100) in whom epidural catheters were tunneled vertically in the paravertebral subcutaneous tissue and group II (n = 100) wherein a Lockit device was used to fix the catheter. Likert score was used to quantify patient's comfort during procedure. The techniques were compared for migration, catheter dislodgement, local trauma, catheter snapping and catheter obstruction. RESULTS: 12% of tunneled catheters had migrated significantly outward. 22% of patients had erythema and 77% had significant procedural discomfort in group I. In group II, 3% catheters had kinked and 14% had erythema from device adhesive. CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of Lockit device as a safe and comfortable fixation device compared to subcutaneous tunneling of catheters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4784217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47842172016-03-22 Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique Sharma, Ashima Parasa, Sujay Kumar Tejvath, Kiran Ramachandran, Gopinath J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The technique of securing the epidural catheter has a major bearing on the efficacy of epidural analgesia. Specific fixator devices, for e.g., Lockit epidural catheter clamp, which successfully prevents catheter migration, are available. The possibility of catheter snapping and surgical retrieval has been reported with tunneling of catheters. These techniques have not been compared for safety, efficacy and appropriateness of achieving secure epidural catheter fixation in the postoperative period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients who required postoperative epidural analgesia were included. They were randomized into two groups: Group I (n = 100) in whom epidural catheters were tunneled vertically in the paravertebral subcutaneous tissue and group II (n = 100) wherein a Lockit device was used to fix the catheter. Likert score was used to quantify patient's comfort during procedure. The techniques were compared for migration, catheter dislodgement, local trauma, catheter snapping and catheter obstruction. RESULTS: 12% of tunneled catheters had migrated significantly outward. 22% of patients had erythema and 77% had significant procedural discomfort in group I. In group II, 3% catheters had kinked and 14% had erythema from device adhesive. CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of Lockit device as a safe and comfortable fixation device compared to subcutaneous tunneling of catheters. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4784217/ /pubmed/27006544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175667 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Ashima Parasa, Sujay Kumar Tejvath, Kiran Ramachandran, Gopinath Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique |
title | Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique |
title_full | Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique |
title_fullStr | Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique |
title_short | Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique |
title_sort | epidural catheter fixation. a comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaashima epiduralcatheterfixationacomparisonofsubcutaneoustunnelingversusdevicefixationtechnique AT parasasujaykumar epiduralcatheterfixationacomparisonofsubcutaneoustunnelingversusdevicefixationtechnique AT tejvathkiran epiduralcatheterfixationacomparisonofsubcutaneoustunnelingversusdevicefixationtechnique AT ramachandrangopinath epiduralcatheterfixationacomparisonofsubcutaneoustunnelingversusdevicefixationtechnique |