Cargando…

Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The technique of securing the epidural catheter has a major bearing on the efficacy of epidural analgesia. Specific fixator devices, for e.g., Lockit epidural catheter clamp, which successfully prevents catheter migration, are available. The possibility of catheter snapping and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Ashima, Parasa, Sujay Kumar, Tejvath, Kiran, Ramachandran, Gopinath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006544
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175667
_version_ 1782420229398200320
author Sharma, Ashima
Parasa, Sujay Kumar
Tejvath, Kiran
Ramachandran, Gopinath
author_facet Sharma, Ashima
Parasa, Sujay Kumar
Tejvath, Kiran
Ramachandran, Gopinath
author_sort Sharma, Ashima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The technique of securing the epidural catheter has a major bearing on the efficacy of epidural analgesia. Specific fixator devices, for e.g., Lockit epidural catheter clamp, which successfully prevents catheter migration, are available. The possibility of catheter snapping and surgical retrieval has been reported with tunneling of catheters. These techniques have not been compared for safety, efficacy and appropriateness of achieving secure epidural catheter fixation in the postoperative period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients who required postoperative epidural analgesia were included. They were randomized into two groups: Group I (n = 100) in whom epidural catheters were tunneled vertically in the paravertebral subcutaneous tissue and group II (n = 100) wherein a Lockit device was used to fix the catheter. Likert score was used to quantify patient's comfort during procedure. The techniques were compared for migration, catheter dislodgement, local trauma, catheter snapping and catheter obstruction. RESULTS: 12% of tunneled catheters had migrated significantly outward. 22% of patients had erythema and 77% had significant procedural discomfort in group I. In group II, 3% catheters had kinked and 14% had erythema from device adhesive. CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of Lockit device as a safe and comfortable fixation device compared to subcutaneous tunneling of catheters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4784217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47842172016-03-22 Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique Sharma, Ashima Parasa, Sujay Kumar Tejvath, Kiran Ramachandran, Gopinath J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The technique of securing the epidural catheter has a major bearing on the efficacy of epidural analgesia. Specific fixator devices, for e.g., Lockit epidural catheter clamp, which successfully prevents catheter migration, are available. The possibility of catheter snapping and surgical retrieval has been reported with tunneling of catheters. These techniques have not been compared for safety, efficacy and appropriateness of achieving secure epidural catheter fixation in the postoperative period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients who required postoperative epidural analgesia were included. They were randomized into two groups: Group I (n = 100) in whom epidural catheters were tunneled vertically in the paravertebral subcutaneous tissue and group II (n = 100) wherein a Lockit device was used to fix the catheter. Likert score was used to quantify patient's comfort during procedure. The techniques were compared for migration, catheter dislodgement, local trauma, catheter snapping and catheter obstruction. RESULTS: 12% of tunneled catheters had migrated significantly outward. 22% of patients had erythema and 77% had significant procedural discomfort in group I. In group II, 3% catheters had kinked and 14% had erythema from device adhesive. CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of Lockit device as a safe and comfortable fixation device compared to subcutaneous tunneling of catheters. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4784217/ /pubmed/27006544 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175667 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Ashima
Parasa, Sujay Kumar
Tejvath, Kiran
Ramachandran, Gopinath
Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique
title Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique
title_full Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique
title_fullStr Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique
title_full_unstemmed Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique
title_short Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique
title_sort epidural catheter fixation. a comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006544
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175667
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaashima epiduralcatheterfixationacomparisonofsubcutaneoustunnelingversusdevicefixationtechnique
AT parasasujaykumar epiduralcatheterfixationacomparisonofsubcutaneoustunnelingversusdevicefixationtechnique
AT tejvathkiran epiduralcatheterfixationacomparisonofsubcutaneoustunnelingversusdevicefixationtechnique
AT ramachandrangopinath epiduralcatheterfixationacomparisonofsubcutaneoustunnelingversusdevicefixationtechnique