Cargando…
Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of nitro-glycerine (NTG) lingual spray for attenuation of the hemodynamic response associated with intubation is not much investigated. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of NTG lingual pump or pen spray in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006545 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175668 |
_version_ | 1782420229620498432 |
---|---|
author | Kumari, Indira Naithani, Udita Dadheech, Vinod Kumar Pradeep, D. S. Meena, Khemraj Verma, Devendra |
author_facet | Kumari, Indira Naithani, Udita Dadheech, Vinod Kumar Pradeep, D. S. Meena, Khemraj Verma, Devendra |
author_sort | Kumari, Indira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of nitro-glycerine (NTG) lingual spray for attenuation of the hemodynamic response associated with intubation is not much investigated. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of NTG lingual pump or pen spray in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic responses and to elucidate the optimum dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 90 adult patients of ASA I, II, 18-60 year posted for elective general surgery under general anesthesia with intubation were randomly allocated to three groups as Group C (control) - receiving no NTG spray, Group N1 – receiving 1 NTG spray and Group N2 – receiving 2 NTG spray one minute before intubation. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate were recorded at baseline, just before intubation (i.e., 60 s just after induction and NTG spray), immediately after intubation, at 1, 2, 5 and 10 min after intubation. RESULTS: Incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in Group C (60%, n = 18) as compared to Group N1 and N2 (10%, n = 3 each), P < 0.01. Mean value of SBP, DBP and MAP showed a significant rise as compared to baseline, following intubation in control group (15.31% in SBP, 12.12% in DBP, 17.77% in MAP) that persisted till 5 min, while no significant rise was observed in Group N1 and N2. There was a trend toward fall in blood pressure in Group N2 (4.95% fall in SBP, 4.72% fall in MAP) 1-min following spray, which was clinically insignificant. Mean value of SBP, DBP and MAP was significantly higher in Group C than in Group N1, which was in turn greater than Group N2 (Group C > N1> N2), P < 0.05. However, incidence of tachycardia was comparable in three groups (70% in group C, 63.33% in Group N1 and 67.77% in Group N2, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the NTG lingual spray in dose of 0.4 mg (1 spray) or 0.8 mg (2 sprays) was effective in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic response, in terms of preventing significant rise in SBP, DBP and MAP compared to control group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4784218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47842182016-03-22 Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray Kumari, Indira Naithani, Udita Dadheech, Vinod Kumar Pradeep, D. S. Meena, Khemraj Verma, Devendra J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of nitro-glycerine (NTG) lingual spray for attenuation of the hemodynamic response associated with intubation is not much investigated. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of NTG lingual pump or pen spray in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic responses and to elucidate the optimum dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 90 adult patients of ASA I, II, 18-60 year posted for elective general surgery under general anesthesia with intubation were randomly allocated to three groups as Group C (control) - receiving no NTG spray, Group N1 – receiving 1 NTG spray and Group N2 – receiving 2 NTG spray one minute before intubation. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate were recorded at baseline, just before intubation (i.e., 60 s just after induction and NTG spray), immediately after intubation, at 1, 2, 5 and 10 min after intubation. RESULTS: Incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in Group C (60%, n = 18) as compared to Group N1 and N2 (10%, n = 3 each), P < 0.01. Mean value of SBP, DBP and MAP showed a significant rise as compared to baseline, following intubation in control group (15.31% in SBP, 12.12% in DBP, 17.77% in MAP) that persisted till 5 min, while no significant rise was observed in Group N1 and N2. There was a trend toward fall in blood pressure in Group N2 (4.95% fall in SBP, 4.72% fall in MAP) 1-min following spray, which was clinically insignificant. Mean value of SBP, DBP and MAP was significantly higher in Group C than in Group N1, which was in turn greater than Group N2 (Group C > N1> N2), P < 0.05. However, incidence of tachycardia was comparable in three groups (70% in group C, 63.33% in Group N1 and 67.77% in Group N2, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the NTG lingual spray in dose of 0.4 mg (1 spray) or 0.8 mg (2 sprays) was effective in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic response, in terms of preventing significant rise in SBP, DBP and MAP compared to control group. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4784218/ /pubmed/27006545 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175668 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumari, Indira Naithani, Udita Dadheech, Vinod Kumar Pradeep, D. S. Meena, Khemraj Verma, Devendra Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray |
title | Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray |
title_full | Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray |
title_fullStr | Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray |
title_full_unstemmed | Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray |
title_short | Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray |
title_sort | attenuation of pressor response following intubation: efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006545 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumariindira attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray AT naithaniudita attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray AT dadheechvinodkumar attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray AT pradeepds attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray AT meenakhemraj attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray AT vermadevendra attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray |