Cargando…

Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of nitro-glycerine (NTG) lingual spray for attenuation of the hemodynamic response associated with intubation is not much investigated. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of NTG lingual pump or pen spray in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumari, Indira, Naithani, Udita, Dadheech, Vinod Kumar, Pradeep, D. S., Meena, Khemraj, Verma, Devendra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006545
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175668
_version_ 1782420229620498432
author Kumari, Indira
Naithani, Udita
Dadheech, Vinod Kumar
Pradeep, D. S.
Meena, Khemraj
Verma, Devendra
author_facet Kumari, Indira
Naithani, Udita
Dadheech, Vinod Kumar
Pradeep, D. S.
Meena, Khemraj
Verma, Devendra
author_sort Kumari, Indira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of nitro-glycerine (NTG) lingual spray for attenuation of the hemodynamic response associated with intubation is not much investigated. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of NTG lingual pump or pen spray in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic responses and to elucidate the optimum dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 90 adult patients of ASA I, II, 18-60 year posted for elective general surgery under general anesthesia with intubation were randomly allocated to three groups as Group C (control) - receiving no NTG spray, Group N1 – receiving 1 NTG spray and Group N2 – receiving 2 NTG spray one minute before intubation. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate were recorded at baseline, just before intubation (i.e., 60 s just after induction and NTG spray), immediately after intubation, at 1, 2, 5 and 10 min after intubation. RESULTS: Incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in Group C (60%, n = 18) as compared to Group N1 and N2 (10%, n = 3 each), P < 0.01. Mean value of SBP, DBP and MAP showed a significant rise as compared to baseline, following intubation in control group (15.31% in SBP, 12.12% in DBP, 17.77% in MAP) that persisted till 5 min, while no significant rise was observed in Group N1 and N2. There was a trend toward fall in blood pressure in Group N2 (4.95% fall in SBP, 4.72% fall in MAP) 1-min following spray, which was clinically insignificant. Mean value of SBP, DBP and MAP was significantly higher in Group C than in Group N1, which was in turn greater than Group N2 (Group C > N1> N2), P < 0.05. However, incidence of tachycardia was comparable in three groups (70% in group C, 63.33% in Group N1 and 67.77% in Group N2, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the NTG lingual spray in dose of 0.4 mg (1 spray) or 0.8 mg (2 sprays) was effective in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic response, in terms of preventing significant rise in SBP, DBP and MAP compared to control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4784218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47842182016-03-22 Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray Kumari, Indira Naithani, Udita Dadheech, Vinod Kumar Pradeep, D. S. Meena, Khemraj Verma, Devendra J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of nitro-glycerine (NTG) lingual spray for attenuation of the hemodynamic response associated with intubation is not much investigated. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of NTG lingual pump or pen spray in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic responses and to elucidate the optimum dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 90 adult patients of ASA I, II, 18-60 year posted for elective general surgery under general anesthesia with intubation were randomly allocated to three groups as Group C (control) - receiving no NTG spray, Group N1 – receiving 1 NTG spray and Group N2 – receiving 2 NTG spray one minute before intubation. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate were recorded at baseline, just before intubation (i.e., 60 s just after induction and NTG spray), immediately after intubation, at 1, 2, 5 and 10 min after intubation. RESULTS: Incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in Group C (60%, n = 18) as compared to Group N1 and N2 (10%, n = 3 each), P < 0.01. Mean value of SBP, DBP and MAP showed a significant rise as compared to baseline, following intubation in control group (15.31% in SBP, 12.12% in DBP, 17.77% in MAP) that persisted till 5 min, while no significant rise was observed in Group N1 and N2. There was a trend toward fall in blood pressure in Group N2 (4.95% fall in SBP, 4.72% fall in MAP) 1-min following spray, which was clinically insignificant. Mean value of SBP, DBP and MAP was significantly higher in Group C than in Group N1, which was in turn greater than Group N2 (Group C > N1> N2), P < 0.05. However, incidence of tachycardia was comparable in three groups (70% in group C, 63.33% in Group N1 and 67.77% in Group N2, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the NTG lingual spray in dose of 0.4 mg (1 spray) or 0.8 mg (2 sprays) was effective in attenuation of intubation induced hemodynamic response, in terms of preventing significant rise in SBP, DBP and MAP compared to control group. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4784218/ /pubmed/27006545 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175668 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumari, Indira
Naithani, Udita
Dadheech, Vinod Kumar
Pradeep, D. S.
Meena, Khemraj
Verma, Devendra
Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray
title Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray
title_full Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray
title_fullStr Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray
title_full_unstemmed Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray
title_short Attenuation of pressor response following intubation: Efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray
title_sort attenuation of pressor response following intubation: efficacy of nitro-glycerine lingual spray
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4784218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006545
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.175668
work_keys_str_mv AT kumariindira attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray
AT naithaniudita attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray
AT dadheechvinodkumar attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray
AT pradeepds attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray
AT meenakhemraj attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray
AT vermadevendra attenuationofpressorresponsefollowingintubationefficacyofnitroglycerinelingualspray